<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Small Cable Co. Squeeze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/the-small-cable-co-squeeze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/the-small-cable-co-squeeze/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:56:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Smaller Cable Networks At Risk Of Being Squeezed Out?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/the-small-cable-co-squeeze/#comment-269015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Are Smaller Cable Networks At Risk Of Being Squeezed Out?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85359#comment-269015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GigaOM reported earlier this year that some smaller cable companies, like Broadstripe, were already evaluating their content mix more closely due to the cost of content. But the fact that AT&amp;T may drop Hallmark shows that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOM reported earlier this year that some smaller cable companies, like Broadstripe, were already evaluating their content mix more closely due to the cost of content. But the fact that AT&amp;T may drop Hallmark shows that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
