<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quintura Says Google Infringes Search Interface Patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff r</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The visual representation shouldn&#039;t be patentable, the underlying algorithms/heuristics/AI that determine the relation between topics maybe. Agree this looks a lot like mind mapping visually.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The visual representation shouldn&#8217;t be patentable, the underlying algorithms/heuristics/AI that determine the relation between topics maybe. Agree this looks a lot like mind mapping visually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Are you guys talking about ThinkMap / Visual Thesaurus? If so I&#039;m with you. If you look at the patent it is kind of amazing that it was awarded.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If not, what is &quot;Mind Mapping&quot; as regards search?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you guys talking about ThinkMap / Visual Thesaurus? If so I&#8217;m with you. If you look at the patent it is kind of amazing that it was awarded.</p>
<p>If not, what is &#8220;Mind Mapping&#8221; as regards search?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quintura dice que Google infringe su patente de interfaz. &#124; rhypee 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quintura dice que Google infringe su patente de interfaz. &#124; rhypee 2.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] en Gigaom   Si te gusto, comparteme These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en Gigaom   Si te gusto, comparteme These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bastian Nutzinger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bastian Nutzinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;yeah. If anybody has a right to this patent its the guy who invented the mindmap.
Besides the represantation quintura choose to display the relation of theese words more closely resembles a tag cloud then a mindmap so they aren´t even visually comparable.
So what exactly is the patent they are claiming? Do they own the right to showing the relationship between a set of data independent of the visual represantation?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah. If anybody has a right to this patent its the guy who invented the mindmap.<br />
Besides the represantation quintura choose to display the relation of theese words more closely resembles a tag cloud then a mindmap so they aren´t even visually comparable.<br />
So what exactly is the patent they are claiming? Do they own the right to showing the relationship between a set of data independent of the visual represantation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cintra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cintra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think both of these could face trouble with the original Mind Mapping people from many years ago..&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think both of these could face trouble with the original Mind Mapping people from many years ago..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Journalism -- and a scoop no less. Nice work.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalism &#8212; and a scoop no less. Nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;We talked to the company and did the reporting. I know how old fashioned :-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We talked to the company and did the reporting. I know how old fashioned :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/10/quintura-says-google-infringes-search-interface-patent/#comment-232974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=85589#comment-232974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Not seeing this covered anywhere else, can you mention a source?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not seeing this covered anywhere else, can you mention a source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
