15 Comments

Summary:

As Facebook updates its privacy settings today, the site won’t be any more private. Unless users have ever changed their settings or do so now, most everything for those 18 and up is now set to be visible by everyone on the Internet.

Only 15-20 percent of Facebook’s 350 million users have ever modified their privacy settings, the company said. As the site today revises its privacy settings to pop up every single time a user posts an item, that portion will surely go up. But Facebook won’t be any more private. In fact, unless a user has ever changed a setting or does so now, most everything for those ages 18 and up is now set to be visible by everyone. That doesn’t mean everyone on Facebook — rather everyone on the Internet.


For instance, user status updates — Facebook’s equivalent of Twitter — used to by default only be shown to users’ friends and networks. Now they will by default be visible to everyone. Same goes for each person’s photos, videos, notes and links.

Facebook said, as always, it hopes the changes will inspire more sharing — though some people may use the settings to share with smaller groups. Users can now choose to share any one item with their friends, friends of friends, everyone, or a custom setting (eliminating the previous option of regional networks). The site recommends people limit access to personal information, such as their birthday and phone number, and makes updates by those who are under 18 automatically unavailable to the public.

Still, the reason so few users participated in privacy settings in the past was not just because they were hidden on a settings page. Thinking about privacy in an outward way is just awkward. It’s a necessary part of living our lives on the web, but that doesn’t make it feel natural. I think we can safely say that the majority of Facebook users will continue to use the default, meaning they will be sharing more publicly, not less.

Meanwhile, people’s Facebook identities, privacy settings and all, are increasingly becoming the way they participate on the web. The company also said today that 60 million of its users utilize Facebook Connect each month on more than 80,000 web sites, one year after launch. One of the key features of Facebook Connect is that it publishes users’ activity on outside sites as an update to their Facebook streams. Taken together with the new privacy settings, that’s a ton of information becoming public every day — and growing.

Please see the disclosure regarding Facebook on my bio page.

  1. Ive deactivated my account because of this!

    Share
  2. I had a FaceBook account for 2 months. I visited it almost never. The last time I got into it, I changed all the security settings so that almost nobody could interact with it. (This was in October.) Then a couple of weeks ago I saw something on a Google search that I wanted to know about, had to sign in to FaceBook in order to see it — and found my account disabled for supposedly improper actions of mine that I could get no details on. When I appealed to them for help about it, they said they could only prove the account was mine if I scanned in a government issue photo id and sent it to them! This seemed like phishing to me, but as near as I can tell, they were who they said they were, and were in earnest. Eventually, after much email arm-waving on my part, they cancelled the account at my request — even though I had not been proved to own the account. It’s a relief to be rid of it!

    Share
  3. It appears that my profile picture is ALWAYS available to anyone on the internet who searches? Is that true? That’s not the way it was before, though, right?
    And it sounds like there’s no way to change it back to private?
    Thanks for following this!

    Share
  4. [...] are and who we know should become an amazing indicator of what we want. Though it’s not the searchable public information Facebook and everyone else wants to make money from these days, this activity is even more [...]

    Share
  5. [...] It might be a little dodgy to make users’ activities more public after the fact (hello, Facebook), but Nigam says he’s protecting against that by allowing users to make alerts private, and [...]

    Share
  6. [...] theories may actually be better circulated than legitimate changes, like Facebook’s recent privacy settings change that made much of its users’ content public by default. Still, when we live so much of our [...]

    Share
  7. [...] information we share online, especially in light of all of the recent discussions about the changes to Facebook’s privacy policy. I actually believe that online privacy is more of an illusion than it is reality, but maintaining [...]

    Share
  8. [...] information we share online, especially in light of all of the recent discussions about the changes to Facebook’s privacy policy. I actually believe that online privacy is more of an illusion than it is reality, but maintaining [...]

    Share
  9. [...] to Facebook’s privacy controls and thought that some of your settings had been changed to expose more of your content to the outside world than ever before, you’re not alone. At least one Facebook user has filed [...]

    Share
  10. [...] criticized Google for its rollout of Buzz and Facebook for its privacy setting changes that pushed users to make their online participation more public by taking advantage of the fact [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post