<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor Has It: Apple Says &#8220;No&#8221; to Mobile Intel Core i5 and i7 Chips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YWAMcloud&#39;s Sandbox &#124; Home &#124; The Apple Experience</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YWAMcloud&#39;s Sandbox &#124; Home &#124; The Apple Experience]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Intel’s better-than-previously-integrated-but-not-quite-as-good-as-a-standalone graphics chipset. Rumor has it that Apple isn’t a fan of this implementation (as right it shouldn’t be, desiring a dedicated professional graphics card [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel’s better-than-previously-integrated-but-not-quite-as-good-as-a-standalone graphics chipset. Rumor has it that Apple isn’t a fan of this implementation (as right it shouldn’t be, desiring a dedicated professional graphics card [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Promo Material Points to Core i5 MacBook Pros &#124; Latest electronics</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intel Promo Material Points to Core i5 MacBook Pros &#124; Latest electronics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] powerful notebook line. If Apple does decide to go with the Core i5 chips, contrary to earlier rumblings, future MacBook Pro owners can expect a nice little increase in performance over the Core 2 Duo [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] powerful notebook line. If Apple does decide to go with the Core i5 chips, contrary to earlier rumblings, future MacBook Pro owners can expect a nice little increase in performance over the Core 2 Duo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Promo Material Points to Core i5 MacBook Pros</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intel Promo Material Points to Core i5 MacBook Pros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] powerful notebook line. If Apple does decide to go with the Core i5 chips, contrary to earlier rumblings, future MacBook Pro owners can expect a nice little increase in performance over the Core 2 Duo [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] powerful notebook line. If Apple does decide to go with the Core i5 chips, contrary to earlier rumblings, future MacBook Pro owners can expect a nice little increase in performance over the Core 2 Duo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree.. If you need a 15/17 inch MBP wait. The next upgrades will have a 1920 x 1080 screen (MBP 15&quot;). Great for HD. I imagine Apple will offer BlueRay R/W to as well as an HDMI port.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.. If you need a 15/17 inch MBP wait. The next upgrades will have a 1920 x 1080 screen (MBP 15&#8243;). Great for HD. I imagine Apple will offer BlueRay R/W to as well as an HDMI port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Intel Core i5 and i7 for Mac? &#124; Notebooks.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No Intel Core i5 and i7 for Mac? &#124; Notebooks.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the great rumor mill that is all things Apple this item, compliments of the team at TheAppleBlog, caught my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the great rumor mill that is all things Apple this item, compliments of the team at TheAppleBlog, caught my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theAppleBlog.com przwiduje przyszłość</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theAppleBlog.com przwiduje przyszłość]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] iMakach (i5 w wersji mobilnej ma mieć tylko dwa rdzenie). Co prawda słyszy się o tym, że Apple nie podoba się zintegrowana z procesorami karta graficzna, co nie zmienia faktu, że i tak MacBooki zostaną prędzej, czy później wyposażone w procesory [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iMakach (i5 w wersji mobilnej ma mieć tylko dwa rdzenie). Co prawda słyszy się o tym, że Apple nie podoba się zintegrowana z procesorami karta graficzna, co nie zmienia faktu, że i tak MacBooki zostaną prędzej, czy później wyposażone w procesory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Industry News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Predicting 2010: Mac Lineup</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech Industry News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Predicting 2010: Mac Lineup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Intel’s better-than-previously-integrated-but-not-quite-as-good-as-a-standalone graphics chipset. Rumor has it that Apple isn’t a fan of this implementation (as right it shouldn&#8217;t be, desiring a dedicated professional graphics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel’s better-than-previously-integrated-but-not-quite-as-good-as-a-standalone graphics chipset. Rumor has it that Apple isn’t a fan of this implementation (as right it shouldn&#8217;t be, desiring a dedicated professional graphics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Predicting 2010: Mac Lineup</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Predicting 2010: Mac Lineup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Intel’s better-than-previously-integrated-but-not-quite-as-good-as-a-standalone graphics chipset. Rumor has it that Apple isn’t a fan of this implementation (as right it shouldn&#8217;t be, desiring a dedicated professional graphics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel’s better-than-previously-integrated-but-not-quite-as-good-as-a-standalone graphics chipset. Rumor has it that Apple isn’t a fan of this implementation (as right it shouldn&#8217;t be, desiring a dedicated professional graphics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Champs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/07/rumor-has-it-apple-says-no-to-mobile-intel-core-i5-and-i7-chips/#comment-375788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Champs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=37143#comment-375788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As ever, the computer you buy today will be obsolete next month, but the i5/i7 upgrade is not one to be on the wrong side of.  

The smart buyers will hold out on buying a new MacBook &lt;em&gt;Pro&lt;/em&gt;, anyway, as long as this stalemate goes on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ever, the computer you buy today will be obsolete next month, but the i5/i7 upgrade is not one to be on the wrong side of.  </p>
<p>The smart buyers will hold out on buying a new MacBook <em>Pro</em>, anyway, as long as this stalemate goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
