<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sweden: A Model for the Broadband Future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/12/03/sweden-a-model-for-the-broadband-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/03/sweden-a-model-for-the-broadband-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweden Predicts the Future of Broadband and It May Scare You</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/03/sweden-a-model-for-the-broadband-future/#comment-232092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sweden Predicts the Future of Broadband and It May Scare You]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=83890#comment-232092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] 29, 2010, 1:11pm PDT No Comments   &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;4   Last December I covered a Swedish telecom regulator&#8217;s report on the effect open networks have on competition and broadband innovation. At the time I could only [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 29, 2010, 1:11pm PDT No Comments   &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;4   Last December I covered a Swedish telecom regulator&#8217;s report on the effect open networks have on competition and broadband innovation. At the time I could only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweden Rocks and The U.S. Drops in Tech Productivity Study &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/03/sweden-a-model-for-the-broadband-future/#comment-232091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sweden Rocks and The U.S. Drops in Tech Productivity Study &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=83890#comment-232091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] property and laws that promote competition in information and communication technology. It also has a robust physical communications network.    : Data, Sweden, U.S., World Economic Forum  &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] property and laws that promote competition in information and communication technology. It also has a robust physical communications network.    : Data, Sweden, U.S., World Economic Forum  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Comstedt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/03/sweden-a-model-for-the-broadband-future/#comment-232090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anders Comstedt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=83890#comment-232090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Mr Bennet makes a few interesting observations, but unfortunately the conclusions are based upon a mix of false logic. True, population density is THE main factor, more important than purchasing power etc. We can also agree upon that Telia was one of the earliset to transform from the traditional PTT style (ATT/Ma Bell style for US readers) to what they are today.
Where Mr Bennet totally misses the mark are the rest of his reasoning and conclusions. The easy thing, and likely the main reason for the FCC to seriuosly considering looking deeper and more at Sweden than any other country in the OECD is related to, yes, population density. With an average population of 20 per sq km, vs  200 for EU in average, his remark re &quot;so many Swedes have chosen to live in high-rise buildings in Stockholm&quot; is not only misleading but blatantly wrong. The critical element is instead that muni driven fiber deployment has taken place in +190 of the 292 local administrations, enabling competition.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the reasons why Telia is more apt than several of its siblings, FT, DT et al, I can only refer to competitive pressure. This is a much more complex reasoning than could be expanded upon in a short comment, but it is still a fact that not even the laggards in the PTS can neglect this anymore. They are now playing catch up, not leading the way. Myths around infrastructure competition are crumbling, a common open fiber infrastructure is unavoidable. It is just a matter of how. Telia knows this too and are playing a careful, controlled retrenching game maximising its position as far as possible under the slow policy changes they like to see and lobby for in Brussels. Most likely, Telia&#039;s infrastructure arm, Skanova, will soon be at arms length and consolidating lots of local fiber builds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I trust your big telco sponsored stay in Brussels was to your liking and fitted you view of the world. Most welcome to see more of the realities behind the EU, and not least Swedish, transformation of the telecom market.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Bennet makes a few interesting observations, but unfortunately the conclusions are based upon a mix of false logic. True, population density is THE main factor, more important than purchasing power etc. We can also agree upon that Telia was one of the earliset to transform from the traditional PTT style (ATT/Ma Bell style for US readers) to what they are today.<br />
Where Mr Bennet totally misses the mark are the rest of his reasoning and conclusions. The easy thing, and likely the main reason for the FCC to seriuosly considering looking deeper and more at Sweden than any other country in the OECD is related to, yes, population density. With an average population of 20 per sq km, vs  200 for EU in average, his remark re &#8220;so many Swedes have chosen to live in high-rise buildings in Stockholm&#8221; is not only misleading but blatantly wrong. The critical element is instead that muni driven fiber deployment has taken place in +190 of the 292 local administrations, enabling competition.</p>
<p>As for the reasons why Telia is more apt than several of its siblings, FT, DT et al, I can only refer to competitive pressure. This is a much more complex reasoning than could be expanded upon in a short comment, but it is still a fact that not even the laggards in the PTS can neglect this anymore. They are now playing catch up, not leading the way. Myths around infrastructure competition are crumbling, a common open fiber infrastructure is unavoidable. It is just a matter of how. Telia knows this too and are playing a careful, controlled retrenching game maximising its position as far as possible under the slow policy changes they like to see and lobby for in Brussels. Most likely, Telia&#8217;s infrastructure arm, Skanova, will soon be at arms length and consolidating lots of local fiber builds.</p>
<p>I trust your big telco sponsored stay in Brussels was to your liking and fitted you view of the world. Most welcome to see more of the realities behind the EU, and not least Swedish, transformation of the telecom market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/03/sweden-a-model-for-the-broadband-future/#comment-232089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=83890#comment-232089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week, I had the privilege of participating at an &quot;Openess&quot; discussion in Brussels at the behest of the Swedish telecoms operator, Telia-Sonera. One advantage that Sweden has over most other countries is an innovative operator who happens to be committed to enhancing the opportunities for innovation and widespread deployment of next-generation network services, is looking beyond the telecom era, and fully embracing the all-IP future in which telephony is software.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s also quite nice for high-speed broadband that so many Swedes have chosen to live in high-rise buildings in Stockholm, thereby ensuring that the costs of optical interconnection are among the lowest in the world. Koreans have been similarly prudent.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, I had the privilege of participating at an &#8220;Openess&#8221; discussion in Brussels at the behest of the Swedish telecoms operator, Telia-Sonera. One advantage that Sweden has over most other countries is an innovative operator who happens to be committed to enhancing the opportunities for innovation and widespread deployment of next-generation network services, is looking beyond the telecom era, and fully embracing the all-IP future in which telephony is software.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also quite nice for high-speed broadband that so many Swedes have chosen to live in high-rise buildings in Stockholm, thereby ensuring that the costs of optical interconnection are among the lowest in the world. Koreans have been similarly prudent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
