<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL Reveals Lame New Look &amp; Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunshinegal2001</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-580238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunshinegal2001]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-580238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL has more problems than a camel with fleas!!! It is the most unsatisfactory server I have ever used!! What&#039;s the deal? They can&#039;t fix problems and now you can&#039;t contact them, try it on line!! Try calling!! Impossible, I&#039;m dumping them ASAP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL has more problems than a camel with fleas!!! It is the most unsatisfactory server I have ever used!! What&#8217;s the deal? They can&#8217;t fix problems and now you can&#8217;t contact them, try it on line!! Try calling!! Impossible, I&#8217;m dumping them ASAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarifvergleich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-574244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarifvergleich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-574244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is going on with Wolff Olins? First the London 2012 Olympics logo, and now this? On one hand, the agency seems to have hit upon a trend in recommending these confusing permutable solutions. And then clients are lapping this stuff up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is going on with Wolff Olins? First the London 2012 Olympics logo, and now this? On one hand, the agency seems to have hit upon a trend in recommending these confusing permutable solutions. And then clients are lapping this stuff up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue 1138</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-574186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue 1138]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-574186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL is a company best known for making its users&#039; lives a living hell whenever anyone wanted to cancel their service.  If they wanted to rebrand themselves, you&#039;d think they would&#039;ve gone with &quot;Yeah, we f*ed up and learned our lesson.&quot;  

But this is just weird.  The lower-case font and period look sad and forlorn, as if AOL is making a frowny-face and wanting us to feel sorry for it, in an endearing and cutesy sort of way.  

This is just so full of fail I don&#039;t know where to begin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL is a company best known for making its users&#8217; lives a living hell whenever anyone wanted to cancel their service.  If they wanted to rebrand themselves, you&#8217;d think they would&#8217;ve gone with &#8220;Yeah, we f*ed up and learned our lesson.&#8221;  </p>
<p>But this is just weird.  The lower-case font and period look sad and forlorn, as if AOL is making a frowny-face and wanting us to feel sorry for it, in an endearing and cutesy sort of way.  </p>
<p>This is just so full of fail I don&#8217;t know where to begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-497404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-497404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top-middle. Not rock. Not Satan. Not heavy metal or even hard blues. Not a charm against the evil-eye. And not the Texas Longhorns.

It represents Moloch, a Canaan deity most often represented by a bull (at &quot;the Grove&quot; it is an owl, but that is for another reason).

If you&#039;ve ever wondered why our world leaders are so fond of making this hand gesture, consider beginning your search for answers with &quot;Moloch.&quot;

And sorry for the bump. A year later, I was wondering when they were going to roll this out... perhaps the bull horns caused a problem?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top-middle. Not rock. Not Satan. Not heavy metal or even hard blues. Not a charm against the evil-eye. And not the Texas Longhorns.</p>
<p>It represents Moloch, a Canaan deity most often represented by a bull (at &#8220;the Grove&#8221; it is an owl, but that is for another reason).</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve ever wondered why our world leaders are so fond of making this hand gesture, consider beginning your search for answers with &#8220;Moloch.&#8221;</p>
<p>And sorry for the bump. A year later, I was wondering when they were going to roll this out&#8230; perhaps the bull horns caused a problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FußbodenCaro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FußbodenCaro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;hey david, i really can´t reconstructyour opinion, cause i think the new colors bring &quot;fresh air&quot; to AOL. I really like their new designs!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey david, i really can´t reconstructyour opinion, cause i think the new colors bring &#8220;fresh air&#8221; to AOL. I really like their new designs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yes! I do too!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I do too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hodo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Hodo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I hate your new look, please give me back my old Aol&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate your new look, please give me back my old Aol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Love it or Loathe It? AOL Reveals New Branding (POLL) &#124; Nab-Excerpt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Love it or Loathe It? AOL Reveals New Branding (POLL) &#124; Nab-Excerpt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the updated logos are a little off-putting to some. Noted technology blogger Om Malik of GigaOM posted his gut reaction Sunday night, calling them out as &#8220;lame,&#8221; &#8220;ambiguous at best,&#8221; and [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the updated logos are a little off-putting to some. Noted technology blogger Om Malik of GigaOM posted his gut reaction Sunday night, calling them out as &#8220;lame,&#8221; &#8220;ambiguous at best,&#8221; and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betty</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[betty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;as far as Im concerned my aol 9.1 was the easiest to find my way around to where ever I wanted to go&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as far as Im concerned my aol 9.1 was the easiest to find my way around to where ever I wanted to go</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betty</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[betty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I cant stand your new look besides that I cant find any thing at all why the change i think about closing my accuont with aol&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant stand your new look besides that I cant find any thing at all why the change i think about closing my accuont with aol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Dandurand</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Dandurand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I am beginning to understand why AOL makes it almost impossible to reach them. Every so often, AOL makes a change. It may be as insignificant as the AOL Logo (which only shows their attempt to be modern) and of course the intelligencia of anyone that really likes it, or it may be the complete WELCOME screen, which whether you want it or not, WILL be changed. I have a few more months of membership due to my 2 year agreement, but when it is over, I shall show AOL what my logo is.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am beginning to understand why AOL makes it almost impossible to reach them. Every so often, AOL makes a change. It may be as insignificant as the AOL Logo (which only shows their attempt to be modern) and of course the intelligencia of anyone that really likes it, or it may be the complete WELCOME screen, which whether you want it or not, WILL be changed. I have a few more months of membership due to my 2 year agreement, but when it is over, I shall show AOL what my logo is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL Can&#8217;t Get Anything Right - datenschwanz.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AOL Can&#8217;t Get Anything Right - datenschwanz.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] initially worried about what kind of atrocity they would subject us to when my wife told me that AOL renamed themselves again. Relief soon settled in. Learning that they had lived up their reputation, I found out that their [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] initially worried about what kind of atrocity they would subject us to when my wife told me that AOL renamed themselves again. Relief soon settled in. Learning that they had lived up their reputation, I found out that their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony dyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anthony dyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;unbelivable! i hate the logo so much. it looks like a 6 year old made that. what does the period mean. I WANT THE OLD LOGO BACK!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unbelivable! i hate the logo so much. it looks like a 6 year old made that. what does the period mean. I WANT THE OLD LOGO BACK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Simmonds</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Simmonds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;hadn&#039;t previously come across this famous telegram highlighting the value of punctuation until recently: “Not getting any better. Come at once” ........which somehow came out the other end as, “Not getting any. Better come at once.” Made me laugh!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hadn&#8217;t previously come across this famous telegram highlighting the value of punctuation until recently: “Not getting any better. Come at once” &#8230;&#8230;..which somehow came out the other end as, “Not getting any. Better come at once.” Made me laugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'Vin G.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA['Vin G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;wtf srsly? does the manager said, uhmm ok I need a logo within 30 seconds using stock photos.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wtf srsly? does the manager said, uhmm ok I need a logo within 30 seconds using stock photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chancey M.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chancey M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/aol-reveals-lame-new-look-logo/#comment-231192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s brilliant. AOL doesn&#039;t need a logo--there&#039;s nothing they could come up with that&#039;s more recognizable than the letters themselves. All they&#039;ve done is given themselves permission to embrace that, which I hope they do despite all the criticism.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s brilliant. AOL doesn&#8217;t need a logo&#8211;there&#8217;s nothing they could come up with that&#8217;s more recognizable than the letters themselves. All they&#8217;ve done is given themselves permission to embrace that, which I hope they do despite all the criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

