<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype CEO Outlines Platform Ambitions, Hiring Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Facebook Buy Skype?: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-287473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should Facebook Buy Skype?: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-287473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] we&#8217;ve outlined before, Skype is trying to embed itself in every conceivable connected device. Whether it&#8217;s an LG television or an iPhone, the new team wants Skype’s IM, voice and SMS [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve outlined before, Skype is trying to embed itself in every conceivable connected device. Whether it&#8217;s an LG television or an iPhone, the new team wants Skype’s IM, voice and SMS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Evolution of Skype</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Evolution of Skype]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] 2009:  Om Malik of GigaOm interviews Skype CEO Josh Silverman about the company&#8217;s platform plans. Silverman confirms: “We want [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2009:  Om Malik of GigaOm interviews Skype CEO Josh Silverman about the company&#8217;s platform plans. Silverman confirms: “We want [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco&#8217;s Competitors Team Up, Form Unified Communication Interoperability Alliance</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco&#8217;s Competitors Team Up, Form Unified Communication Interoperability Alliance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] think that if UCIF wants to be successful over the long term, it needs to work with Skype, which in my view is becoming the de facto leader in low-latency, low-cost and easy-to-use collaboration tools. Small and new web companies in [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think that if UCIF wants to be successful over the long term, it needs to work with Skype, which in my view is becoming the de facto leader in low-latency, low-cost and easy-to-use collaboration tools. Small and new web companies in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype Wants to Make Your TV More Social</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype Wants to Make Your TV More Social]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] move isn&#8217;t totally unexpected. Skype CEO Josh Silverman told Om last November that he saw &#8220;a future where Skype would be embedded in connected game consoles, televisions [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] move isn&#8217;t totally unexpected. Skype CEO Josh Silverman told Om last November that he saw &#8220;a future where Skype would be embedded in connected game consoles, televisions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New @ Symbian &#171; Symbian Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New @ Symbian &#171; Symbian Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] a move which could be a step toward Skype becoming the ubiquitous real-time communications platform CEO Josh Silverman envisions for the company. The release supports 17 different models and includes basic features such as free Skype-to-Skype [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a move which could be a step toward Skype becoming the ubiquitous real-time communications platform CEO Josh Silverman envisions for the company. The release supports 17 different models and includes basic features such as free Skype-to-Skype [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype beta calls on S60 &#171; Mobility Buzz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype beta calls on S60 &#171; Mobility Buzz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] move which could be a step toward Skype becoming the ubiquitous real-time communications platform CEO Josh Silverman envisions for the company. The release supports 17 different models and includes basic features such as free Skype-to-Skype [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] move which could be a step toward Skype becoming the ubiquitous real-time communications platform CEO Josh Silverman envisions for the company. The release supports 17 different models and includes basic features such as free Skype-to-Skype [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype Beta Calls on Symbian Phones &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype Beta Calls on Symbian Phones &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] a move which could be a step toward Skype becoming the ubiquitous real-time communications platform CEO Josh Silverman envisions for the company. The release supports 17 different models and includes basic features such as free Skype-to-Skype [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a move which could be a step toward Skype becoming the ubiquitous real-time communications platform CEO Josh Silverman envisions for the company. The release supports 17 different models and includes basic features such as free Skype-to-Skype [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype as a Next Generation Telephone platform</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype as a Next Generation Telephone platform]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the legal issue put to rest, I can see a rejuvenated Skype hunting for more success. According to  OM , Skype CEO Josh has outlined platform as one of the key product idea for the future. Iam not [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the legal issue put to rest, I can see a rejuvenated Skype hunting for more success. According to  OM , Skype CEO Josh has outlined platform as one of the key product idea for the future. Iam not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babyis60</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[babyis60]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skype for Asterisk is an example of the way they should be heading.
We&#039;ve used it to enable useful skype-in-a-browser functionality
(within googlewave no less ).
The royalty-free licensing of SILK is another step in the right direction.

The question is if they can get folks on-board and an API out the door within your 18 month timeframe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype for Asterisk is an example of the way they should be heading.<br />
We&#8217;ve used it to enable useful skype-in-a-browser functionality<br />
(within googlewave no less ).<br />
The royalty-free licensing of SILK is another step in the right direction.</p>
<p>The question is if they can get folks on-board and an API out the door within your 18 month timeframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Lisser</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Lisser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironically, I&#039;m beginning to think that it will take Skype delivering a multi-chat video/screen-share service to create the long awaited SMB demand for this type of service from other providers. There are reasonably good options out there today for multi-chat video, yet not many with really significant traction yet in the SMB space. So, in the same way that Skype p-p video made one-on-one voice calls seem low impact or &#039;lite&#039;, it may be them who does the same for the 3 person voice conference call. The question will be whether they charge for it (I&#039;d pay something) and if they will crush or create a market while they&#039;re at it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, I&#8217;m beginning to think that it will take Skype delivering a multi-chat video/screen-share service to create the long awaited SMB demand for this type of service from other providers. There are reasonably good options out there today for multi-chat video, yet not many with really significant traction yet in the SMB space. So, in the same way that Skype p-p video made one-on-one voice calls seem low impact or &#8216;lite&#8217;, it may be them who does the same for the 3 person voice conference call. The question will be whether they charge for it (I&#8217;d pay something) and if they will crush or create a market while they&#8217;re at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed... I think they realize that and are working on putting together a plan that might actually work and attract more attention from the VoIP community. My view on this is is - they have 18 months before Google Voice and at least one other small player gets a bigger following with the web developer community.

On the technical aspects, Josh was clear about the missing pieces and recognizes that offering a lame platform can actually be more damaging than not having open APIs. Well let&#039;s see if they can deliver something developers love.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed&#8230; I think they realize that and are working on putting together a plan that might actually work and attract more attention from the VoIP community. My view on this is is &#8211; they have 18 months before Google Voice and at least one other small player gets a bigger following with the web developer community.</p>
<p>On the technical aspects, Josh was clear about the missing pieces and recognizes that offering a lame platform can actually be more damaging than not having open APIs. Well let&#8217;s see if they can deliver something developers love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh he was pretty clear on making video a big focus for the service going forward and we should expect some new features soon. I would be happy with a multi-person chat for starters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh he was pretty clear on making video a big focus for the service going forward and we should expect some new features soon. I would be happy with a multi-person chat for starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am sure there is an answer but to be honest i didn&#039;t have enough time to get all my questions in. next time i am on the phone with him, i probably will chat with him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am sure there is an answer but to be honest i didn&#8217;t have enough time to get all my questions in. next time i am on the phone with him, i probably will chat with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shyam Subramanyan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam Subramanyan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voice is fairly well served now, but video calls are not, especially in hand held and purpose-built devices.  Video conferencing in the enterprise also ties you down to a location.  All of these could be a big opportunity for Skype.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voice is fairly well served now, but video calls are not, especially in hand held and purpose-built devices.  Video conferencing in the enterprise also ties you down to a location.  All of these could be a big opportunity for Skype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hahnfeld</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hahnfeld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just spent a few months working closely with some ex-Skype guys on a start-up which revolves around an embedded Skype client. Reality is, Skype seems to be a long way from the openness &amp; ubiquity they&#039;re discussing here. There are numerous pieces missing both technically and commercially, plus  they seem unable to keep to a schedule.

They need to get their act together or the developers will just move to another platform. Google uses open standards &amp; have everything ready-to-go. People won&#039;t wait forever, and in-the-end Skype&#039;s just a another network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spent a few months working closely with some ex-Skype guys on a start-up which revolves around an embedded Skype client. Reality is, Skype seems to be a long way from the openness &amp; ubiquity they&#8217;re discussing here. There are numerous pieces missing both technically and commercially, plus  they seem unable to keep to a schedule.</p>
<p>They need to get their act together or the developers will just move to another platform. Google uses open standards &amp; have everything ready-to-go. People won&#8217;t wait forever, and in-the-end Skype&#8217;s just a another network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/21/skype-platform-ambitions/#comment-230948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pwb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=82095#comment-230948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe a question about Google Voice?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a question about Google Voice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

