8 Comments

Summary:

The iPhone has not only changed the way people consume data on their mobile phones — thanks to its touchscreen, and the myriad of apps that make grabbing such info from the web on a small device easy — it’s changed assumptions as to which devices […]

The iPhone has not only changed the way people consume data on their mobile phones — thanks to its touchscreen, and the myriad of apps that make grabbing such info from the web on a small device easy — it’s changed assumptions as to which devices consume the most data on mobile networks. Bytemobile, a company that provides equipment for carriers to help deliver video and data to mobile devices using less bandwidth, issued a report today that shows the difference in data consumption by device among carriers that have the iPhone and carriers that don’t. It’s pretty significant.

Laptops are still consuming most of the data on carrier networks that don’t have iPhones on them, but once folks get a touch-based smartphone such as the iPhone (and right now it’s the most popular touch-based smartphone out there), the volume of data used by those devices far exceeds that of laptop usage. In other words, when it comes to the network and data consumption, the device does matter. The report also offers some self-serving data about video consumption on mobile devices that may help carriers save on bandwidth consumption. (GigaOM Pro, subscription required).

Cisco expects mobile data traffic to increase 63-fold over the next five years, driven in part by video. But while it’s clear that laptops and touch-based smartphones make video consumption easier, the rise may not be as steep as Cisco predicts. The report found that while the average video online is about 5 minutes in length, about half of the people only watch 60 seconds of a video, which means that sending the entire file to a user would be a waste of bytes and bandwidth. Only 31 percent of people watched all of a video, and 30 percent watched less than 10 percent. The rest of the viewers stopped watching somewhere in the middle. In addition to bandwidth consumption, such findings also could help determine where best to place ads. Although I for one hate getting pre-roll ads on my phone because that data consumed counts against my mobile bandwidth cap. But maybe I’m just super cheap.

Regardless, the problem with the iPhone is that it’s both a gateway drug for consumers, who’ve now tasted the mobile web and want more of it, as well as a canary in the coal mine, as it shows carriers what’s likely to happen as other touch-based smartphones become more popular on their own networks. Curtailing video, as suggested by the report, will solve some issues, but once you give folks a taste of broadband, they’re going to want more.

  1. Video downloading depends on where you download it. Our objective in designing a CMS based build system for iPhones was to insert content which would be sent of WiFi as opposed to wireless. This would be for products such as magazines rather than YouTube like social sharing. Apple has already anticipated this as well with adaptive streaming, which divides the file up into segments. All of which are not downloaded.

    Personally, I find ad insertion within content to be absolutely annoying. It is ignored.

    Share
  2. I think the problem is that the infrastructure carriers are on is so antiquated that such bandwidths are a burden. Maybe they should have invested in better technology advances rather than those stupid commercials ragging on each other.

    Share
  3. And this comes as a surprise to AT&T? Ten years after getting my first cell phone, and AT&T’s regular cell reception is just as bad today as it was back then. As for surfing the web on AT&T’s EDGE network, I go to a URL and come back in 5 minutes to view the loaded page. It’s all about expectations.

    Share
  4. [...] are accounting for more and more of carrier networks' data volume.Close Forward this [...]

    Share
  5. Its interesting that while some are talking of a problem of plenty.

    Lets talk about a very basic problem.

    iPhone in India: Pay in advance, wait for a day or two before you get it: http://tinyurl.com/y8b5kal

    Share
  6. iphone is hacked… all can root per ssh and Mail is not secure

    Share
  7. I think you overlooked a very simple fact. iPhone apps tend to pull and push data like they were on steroids (including a very prominent Youtube app right up front), which is often not the standard behaviour for other phones that rely significantly less on 3rd party apps but rather on pre-built suites. That single fact alone should reasonably answer the differences in data usage patterns, as partially driven by the machine, and not solely the user.

    Share
  8. [...] also didn’t realize how much of a data disparity the iPhone caused during the last three months of 2009. Cellular carriers with an iPhone  on the network see 52 percent of their data traffic coming from [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post