<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Writer: Writing Advice from Your Past You Should Ignore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LynCat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LynCat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh please, please, please, write with a Brit accent! I&#039;ve craved those expressions for decades...one&#039;s such as &quot;on your bike&quot;, &quot;put a sock in it&quot;, &quot;how about a leg over, luv?&quot;. They bring back memories from the &#039;70s when I worked as an entertainer on a British cruise ship (the Spirit of London, later to become TV&#039;s Love Boat - for the full story of this particular train wreck (ship wreck?) see http://pimpmycruise.com/mod/customindex/ourstory.php). - LC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please, please, please, write with a Brit accent! I&#8217;ve craved those expressions for decades&#8230;one&#8217;s such as &#8220;on your bike&#8221;, &#8220;put a sock in it&#8221;, &#8220;how about a leg over, luv?&#8221;. They bring back memories from the &#8217;70s when I worked as an entertainer on a British cruise ship (the Spirit of London, later to become TV&#8217;s Love Boat &#8211; for the full story of this particular train wreck (ship wreck?) see <a href="http://pimpmycruise.com/mod/customindex/ourstory.php" rel="nofollow">http://pimpmycruise.com/mod/customindex/ourstory.php</a>). &#8211; LC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just this weekend I gave a talk about communicating effectively online. One of my main points was &quot;Don&#039;t let perfect grammar get in the way of an effective message and a consistent voice.&quot; Nobody adheres to strict rules of grammar when they speak, and the web is (usually) an informal and conversational medium for communications.

And I also agree with the spirit behind point #1. I write for a large variety of different clients, and there is often a huge learning curve when it comes to writing content in a new subject area. As a professional, it&#039;s my job to do the work of learning what I need to know. So I agree--Know what you write!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just this weekend I gave a talk about communicating effectively online. One of my main points was &#8220;Don&#8217;t let perfect grammar get in the way of an effective message and a consistent voice.&#8221; Nobody adheres to strict rules of grammar when they speak, and the web is (usually) an informal and conversational medium for communications.</p>
<p>And I also agree with the spirit behind point #1. I write for a large variety of different clients, and there is often a huge learning curve when it comes to writing content in a new subject area. As a professional, it&#8217;s my job to do the work of learning what I need to know. So I agree&#8211;Know what you write!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kaye</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Kaye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Dennis, I disagree with where you went on point 1. But it does seem to describe journalism. Great stories here. Facts and understanding? Not so much.

Speaking of journalism... You wrote a good op-ed zinger to create controversy and feedback! (You win! Here are the replies!) You advertised it nicely by juxtaposing &quot;Honestly&quot; and &quot;to fool&quot; in the same sentence.

You don&#039;t have to be an expert to write about a subject; you have to be a writer. You can research quickly and efficiently to gain a comfortable grasp of your subject. Then write about it. If you are not sure of your facts and assertions, get your piece checked by an expert before publishing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Dennis, I disagree with where you went on point 1. But it does seem to describe journalism. Great stories here. Facts and understanding? Not so much.</p>
<p>Speaking of journalism&#8230; You wrote a good op-ed zinger to create controversy and feedback! (You win! Here are the replies!) You advertised it nicely by juxtaposing &#8220;Honestly&#8221; and &#8220;to fool&#8221; in the same sentence.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to be an expert to write about a subject; you have to be a writer. You can research quickly and efficiently to gain a comfortable grasp of your subject. Then write about it. If you are not sure of your facts and assertions, get your piece checked by an expert before publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreelanceWise</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FreelanceWise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi

I&#039;m very loose when it comes to following grammar rules. Sometimes doing it the &quot;proper&quot; way simply doesn&#039;t seem to give the correct feeling to a sentence.

Juliet]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very loose when it comes to following grammar rules. Sometimes doing it the &#8220;proper&#8221; way simply doesn&#8217;t seem to give the correct feeling to a sentence.</p>
<p>Juliet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyCurtis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TonyCurtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, forgot one other thing:

When I was more active on Twitter, I sure learned how to speak as efficiently as possible. Abbreviating words for that is one thing, but writing a succint and direct sentence that grabs attention is another. Try to spend a day replying to any work emails like it&#039;s a twitter feed, and you&#039;ll get a lot of action items done!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, forgot one other thing:</p>
<p>When I was more active on Twitter, I sure learned how to speak as efficiently as possible. Abbreviating words for that is one thing, but writing a succint and direct sentence that grabs attention is another. Try to spend a day replying to any work emails like it&#8217;s a twitter feed, and you&#8217;ll get a lot of action items done!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyCurtis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TonyCurtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am very much against the current downward spiral in online writing skills. I&#039;m (see what I did there?) by no means an English major, but there are some very simple and terrible mistakes I see over and over in online writing, and sometimes the conversational tone can be so casual that it makes for an overly wordy and confusing article. In some cases, a story is casual to the point that I can&#039;t take the validity of the argument seriously.

As the world gets &quot;closer&quot; because of the internet, we also have an olbigation to make things easier to digest if we are trying to do international business or working with people who do not have strong English or technical language skills.

Rule of thumb: I always write tech like I&#039;m writing to explain it to my grandmother. Conversation, but to the point, and avoiding too many inside references/slang.

Nice article, though. I enjoy Webworkerdaily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very much against the current downward spiral in online writing skills. I&#8217;m (see what I did there?) by no means an English major, but there are some very simple and terrible mistakes I see over and over in online writing, and sometimes the conversational tone can be so casual that it makes for an overly wordy and confusing article. In some cases, a story is casual to the point that I can&#8217;t take the validity of the argument seriously.</p>
<p>As the world gets &#8220;closer&#8221; because of the internet, we also have an olbigation to make things easier to digest if we are trying to do international business or working with people who do not have strong English or technical language skills.</p>
<p>Rule of thumb: I always write tech like I&#8217;m writing to explain it to my grandmother. Conversation, but to the point, and avoiding too many inside references/slang.</p>
<p>Nice article, though. I enjoy Webworkerdaily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ileaneb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ileaneb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a post the other day about over usage of the word &quot;that&quot;. Perhaps it&#039;s true that I use it too much, but there are so many instances that I can&#039;t do without it. lol

Love, love, love, using contractions. Mostly because of the 140 character thingy that I resort to several times a day (better known as Twitter).

Thanks for the post!
@Ileane]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a post the other day about over usage of the word &#8220;that&#8221;. Perhaps it&#8217;s true that I use it too much, but there are so many instances that I can&#8217;t do without it. lol</p>
<p>Love, love, love, using contractions. Mostly because of the 140 character thingy that I resort to several times a day (better known as Twitter).</p>
<p>Thanks for the post!<br />
@Ileane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Cafe Solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New Writer: Writing Advice from Your Past You Should Ignore</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Cafe Solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New Writer: Writing Advice from Your Past You Should Ignore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more here:  The New Writer: Writing Advice from Your Past You Should Ignore  This entry was posted on Saturday, November 14th, 2009 at 8:00 am and is filed under Writing. You [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here:  The New Writer: Writing Advice from Your Past You Should Ignore  This entry was posted on Saturday, November 14th, 2009 at 8:00 am and is filed under Writing. You [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who writes several articles a day online the main rule I break is spelling as I live in the UK but write for a U.S. audience. Organize not organise, color not colour, and a few quirky ones such as not using &quot;straight away&quot; in a sentence.

I agree that writing regularly does help a lot and you get to a point where you can switch your style/s on and off depending on the subject matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who writes several articles a day online the main rule I break is spelling as I live in the UK but write for a U.S. audience. Organize not organise, color not colour, and a few quirky ones such as not using &#8220;straight away&#8221; in a sentence.</p>
<p>I agree that writing regularly does help a lot and you get to a point where you can switch your style/s on and off depending on the subject matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/14/the-new-writer-writing-advice-from-your-past-you-should-ignore/#comment-89347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Mackie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=22751#comment-89347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the editor, that&#039;s my fault, not Darrell&#039;s -- I should have spotted those. Now fixed, thanks, Alan.

However, I don&#039;t think a couple of minor typos invalidate Darrell&#039;s point, which is that getting your material out there is often better than sitting on it, endlessly revising.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the editor, that&#8217;s my fault, not Darrell&#8217;s &#8212; I should have spotted those. Now fixed, thanks, Alan.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think a couple of minor typos invalidate Darrell&#8217;s point, which is that getting your material out there is often better than sitting on it, endlessly revising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
