<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With Video Conferencing Deals, Polycom in Sharp Focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/11/polycom-vs-cisco-video-conferencing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/11/polycom-vs-cisco-video-conferencing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jebb Dykstra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/11/polycom-vs-cisco-video-conferencing/#comment-230199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jebb Dykstra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=79410#comment-230199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polycom has always been the #1 brand in the conference rooms w/ its &quot;polycom&quot; right in the middle. Now with Tandberg in the Cisco bearhug and Lifesize acq&#039;d by Logitech, Polycom is the sole independent. But given their mkt cap compared to Tandberg, the big boys (i.e. IBM, MSFT, HP) will be circling.

With Video Conferencing at an all-time high and with unified communication and collaboration at a fever pitch, this is a very good time for a marriage. HP is most likely buyer and has been most aggressive (and also to make life difficult for CSCO and IBM). But don&#039;t count out IBM or MSFT. Put your money on HP!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polycom has always been the #1 brand in the conference rooms w/ its &#8220;polycom&#8221; right in the middle. Now with Tandberg in the Cisco bearhug and Lifesize acq&#8217;d by Logitech, Polycom is the sole independent. But given their mkt cap compared to Tandberg, the big boys (i.e. IBM, MSFT, HP) will be circling.</p>
<p>With Video Conferencing at an all-time high and with unified communication and collaboration at a fever pitch, this is a very good time for a marriage. HP is most likely buyer and has been most aggressive (and also to make life difficult for CSCO and IBM). But don&#8217;t count out IBM or MSFT. Put your money on HP!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Thursday, 12-Nov-09 06:07:57 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/11/polycom-vs-cisco-video-conferencing/#comment-230198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Thursday, 12-Nov-09 06:07:57 UTC - Identi.ca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=79410#comment-230198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  http://gigaom.com/2009/11/11/polycom-vs-cisco-video-conferencing/        a few seconds ago  from api [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/11/polycom-vs-cisco-video-conferencing/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2009/11/11/polycom-vs-cisco-video-conferencing/</a>        a few seconds ago  from api [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

