<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Conferencing CEO Asks FCC to Keep on Google Voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The FCC Sees the Future &#8212; and It&#8217;s VoIP &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The FCC Sees the Future &#8212; and It&#8217;s VoIP &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] look at what BT is attempting to do or services like Google Voice. This is where FCC efforts in traffic pumping and net neutrality come so strongly into play. In the circuit-switched network, telecommunications [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] look at what BT is attempting to do or services like Google Voice. This is where FCC efforts in traffic pumping and net neutrality come so strongly into play. In the circuit-switched network, telecommunications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Erickson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Erickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They already do]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They already do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Erickson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Erickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jerry, Google just needs to change from one wholesaler to another and get rates that are 10 to 20 times lower.

No need to punish the consumer with charging them 50 times more.

The problem is that you only know what google pays and you don&#039;t know what the tariffs are or the commercial agreement rates.

Which makes your solution crazy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, Google just needs to change from one wholesaler to another and get rates that are 10 to 20 times lower.</p>
<p>No need to punish the consumer with charging them 50 times more.</p>
<p>The problem is that you only know what google pays and you don&#8217;t know what the tariffs are or the commercial agreement rates.</p>
<p>Which makes your solution crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Erickson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Erickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric you need to do some research and stop drinking the punch. I know what numbers Google blocks and I know the rates to the less than 100 numbers they are blocking. 2 to 3 cents they might pay 25 but they don&#039;t have to. Why they don&#039;t pay the lower amount is not anyones fault but google.

No building next door. No loophole. No need to pay 25 cents.

So why do they say they have to pay 25 cents... So they have a reason to block?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric you need to do some research and stop drinking the punch. I know what numbers Google blocks and I know the rates to the less than 100 numbers they are blocking. 2 to 3 cents they might pay 25 but they don&#8217;t have to. Why they don&#8217;t pay the lower amount is not anyones fault but google.</p>
<p>No building next door. No loophole. No need to pay 25 cents.</p>
<p>So why do they say they have to pay 25 cents&#8230; So they have a reason to block?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godong</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another solutions might be for Google to start offering free conferencing, especially for users that already using their service, if it is good perhaps people will start switching from using those other free conferencing. I know I&#039;ll use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another solutions might be for Google to start offering free conferencing, especially for users that already using their service, if it is good perhaps people will start switching from using those other free conferencing. I know I&#8217;ll use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Vandesic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Vandesic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s fine.   If the call isn&#039;t completed, Google doesn&#039;t have to pay the connect fee.  Everyone is happy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fine.   If the call isn&#8217;t completed, Google doesn&#8217;t have to pay the connect fee.  Everyone is happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Voice が見えてくる &#171; maclalala:link</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Voice が見えてくる &#171; maclalala:link]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Free Conferencing CEO Asks FCC to Keep on Google Voice &#124; GigaOM [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Free Conferencing CEO Asks FCC to Keep on Google Voice | GigaOM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this way they have your credit card number along with all the other data they&#039;re collecting on you.  no thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this way they have your credit card number along with all the other data they&#8217;re collecting on you.  no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because a call to one building is $0.005 - $0.03 while these companies next door use a legal loophole to charge $0.25. Thus Google does not have the same low cost option to them that it does to their neighbor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because a call to one building is $0.005 &#8211; $0.03 while these companies next door use a legal loophole to charge $0.25. Thus Google does not have the same low cost option to them that it does to their neighbor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Erickson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/06/free-conferencing-ceo-asks-fcc-to-keep-on-google-voice/#comment-229663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Erickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78726#comment-229663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google says in the NY Tmes that instead of costs of one-half a cent to 3 cents to the areas they are blocking that google has to pay 12, 14 and even 25 cents so they are blocking the calls to free conferencing services.

 Rates between 2 and 3 cents to the locations Google is blocking are available. so why block?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google says in the NY Tmes that instead of costs of one-half a cent to 3 cents to the areas they are blocking that google has to pay 12, 14 and even 25 cents so they are blocking the calls to free conferencing services.</p>
<p> Rates between 2 and 3 cents to the locations Google is blocking are available. so why block?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
