1 Comment

Summary:

[qi:_foundread] Startups may have a high failure rate, but they also are a leading driver of job creation in the U.S., according to a report put out by The Kauffman Foundation this morning. As part of a deeper look at what small business means for the […]

[qi:_foundread] Startups may have a high failure rate, but they also are a leading driver of job creation in the U.S., according to a report put out by The Kauffman Foundation this morning. As part of a deeper look at what small business means for the U.S. economy, the study found that 1- to 5-year-old companies create the highest average number of jobs, at roughly four jobs per year. From the report:

The dynamics of firm age, moreover, point us away from a discussion on the existing distribution of employment and toward a focus on the annual changes in jobs. Let’s ask not where people work, but where each additional increment in net job creation occurs. This approach immediately forces one to recognize that companies in a given size class are not necessarily homogenous: a company with fifteen employees that is twenty-five years old will behave differently than one that is only two years old (differences that will multiply if we classify firms according to economic sector).

First the report points out that, while companies with more than 500 people make up about half of the nation’s employment and payroll, a business’s size is not a good indicator of where new jobs come from. Dane Stangler and Robert E. Litan, who wrote the report, offer up this graph to show that without startups overall job creation in the U.S. would have been negative in most of the years since 1977.

jobcreation

There’s also discussion, but no data, about how M&A at large companies — through which they typically acquire smaller, younger firms — accounts for the job growth at larger companies. The report offers a ton of data about economic sectors, and acknowledges that relying on startups for job creation is both messy and hard to track. It’s all very well to say at a macro level that young companies create jobs even though they have a high likelihood of failure, but at the individual level, relying on an uncertain startup for employment can create enormous personal risk.

The report recommends that to foster job creation, young companies need help. The authors think credit should be made more accessible to businesses as well as banks, and note efforts happening in these area today. They also suggest a payroll tax holiday for new and young businesses, while noting that such a move could add to the deficit.

I would suggest rather, that the government consider some level of universal health care that would reduce costs for a young company, as well as offset the difficulties faced by employees who have to navigate the turbulent nature of working at a startup. Overall, it’s an interesting report, although I’m not sure big business should be written off so easily. They may not be engines of job growth, but in many cases they are engines for startup growth as they buy services, equipment or even ads from them.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

By Stacey Higginbotham

You're subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

Related stories

  1. Hiring Picks Up at Venture-Backed Startups Wednesday, April 21, 2010

    [...] Meanwhile, a report released recently by the Silicon Valley Leadership Group said that tech-sector hiring is definitely picking up. Over half of companies surveyed said they expect to see job growth in their sector, compared with just 17 percent the previous year. Although the demand for talented technology employees could make it harder for startups to compete for those hires with larger firms like Google and Intel, the NVCA report seems to show that venture-backed startups are managing to grow regardless. And that growth is important for the overall economy: A report published last year by the Kauffman Foundation found that startups are a key driver in job creation. [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post