<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Pokes XMPP. MSN, Yahoo &amp; AIM Better Watch Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:42:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aki</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-287670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-287670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ali and Lewis Collard,

Text based protocols may seem easy but often leads to unnecessary complexities. For the sake of human readability, protocols that start out simple at first eventually gets bloated and overly complex. Just look at the WS-* protocol stack if you want an example. And not to mention characters being garbled because the creator of some homepages didn&#039;t bother to define the charset.

While we have problems like endianness in binary communications, text encoding is no simpler and can also be ambiguous which causes hidden headaches and sometimes nasty security holes too. I guess you must prefer something which seems easy at first but is hard to validate until runtime. Script kiddie mentality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ali and Lewis Collard,</p>
<p>Text based protocols may seem easy but often leads to unnecessary complexities. For the sake of human readability, protocols that start out simple at first eventually gets bloated and overly complex. Just look at the WS-* protocol stack if you want an example. And not to mention characters being garbled because the creator of some homepages didn&#8217;t bother to define the charset.</p>
<p>While we have problems like endianness in binary communications, text encoding is no simpler and can also be ambiguous which causes hidden headaches and sometimes nasty security holes too. I guess you must prefer something which seems easy at first but is hard to validate until runtime. Script kiddie mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#124; Technology Blog By ShaileshPatel.Net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#124; Technology Blog By ShaileshPatel.Net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One social web &#171; cubicgarden.com&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[One social web &#171; cubicgarden.com&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to do is impressive and is much more interesting that whats happening with Google Buzz or even Facebook&#8217;s XMPP [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to do is impressive and is much more interesting that whats happening with Google Buzz or even Facebook&#8217;s XMPP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;From my experience, XMPP is good but not the best design. If we have chance to design an alternative IM protocol, i will choose Google protocol buffer instead of XML.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reality is that XMPP is already there, it is not bad and better than other existing ones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have deep experience about XMPP and Google Protocol Buffer.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience, XMPP is good but not the best design. If we have chance to design an alternative IM protocol, i will choose Google protocol buffer instead of XML.</p>
<p>The reality is that XMPP is already there, it is not bad and better than other existing ones.</p>
<p>I have deep experience about XMPP and Google Protocol Buffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I completely agree, Jason.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree, Jason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#171; Internet Marketing Tools</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#171; Internet Marketing Tools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#171; Techknology&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#171; Techknology&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#8211; 10th Edition &#124; Crispy List</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#8211; 10th Edition &#124; Crispy List]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#124; Digital Digg Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Chat Launches XMPP Support &#124; Digital Digg Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook first announced that it was working on implementing Jabber/XMPP support way back in May 2008, and rumors that XMPP support was on its way began anew in November. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook and XMPP: Old News is Old at Ameliorations 1.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/facebook-xmpp-adium-chat/#comment-229558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook and XMPP: Old News is Old at Ameliorations 1.0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78617#comment-229558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] and here) that are over a year old, posted 14 May 2008 and 17 January 2008 respectively. The only recent piece about this is relatively low on details by [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and here) that are over a year old, posted 14 May 2008 and 17 January 2008 respectively. The only recent piece about this is relatively low on details by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
