<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ribbit Mobile&#039;s Launch Shows BT&#039;s Strategy Isn&#039;t Just All Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ribbit Mobile Enters Beta; Invitations Available for WWD Readers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/#comment-229265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ribbit Mobile Enters Beta; Invitations Available for WWD Readers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78204#comment-229265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mobile has more features than Google Voice, and reminds me a bit of VoxOx, which I wrote about a few days ago. This service looks very [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mobile has more features than Google Voice, and reminds me a bit of VoxOx, which I wrote about a few days ago. This service looks very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/#comment-229264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78204#comment-229264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kristie,

i see what you are getting at. to me one problem with  ribbit mobile as a service for people who &#039;can not afford to miss a call&#039; is that it appears to be using many workarounds/hacks. for example the links to skype and MSN i assume are not part of a special deal with those corporations but actually some instances running on a server someplace as a &#039;hack&#039; connection. for the &#039;must be reachable crowd&#039; the only real option is direct calls to landlines and cell phones.

i do see ribbit mobile as very interesting. but that is as a geek/hacker and an early adopter who has a strong interest in everything VOIP. most people like me(who i see as your biggest audience considering the features offered) are not going to spend $30.00 a month and would not find the free version feature rich enough to be interesting.

what would be very interesting is a sort of hosted PBX/VOIPswitch that includes your call routing to the VoIM networks and skype and perhaps the possibility of using voicemail and transcriptions at a flat rate annual fee. i would probably be willing to pay around a $100/year but not much more. but i would not need any PSTN termination or DID&#039;s as long as the platform allowed flexibility it terms of SIP access for inbound and third party termination providers.

at least i would like to think that the free accounts after beta could use services like outbound PSTN calling on a per minute basis.

by the way is it possible to place SIP calls to a ribbit mobile account?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristie,</p>
<p>i see what you are getting at. to me one problem with  ribbit mobile as a service for people who &#8216;can not afford to miss a call&#8217; is that it appears to be using many workarounds/hacks. for example the links to skype and MSN i assume are not part of a special deal with those corporations but actually some instances running on a server someplace as a &#8216;hack&#8217; connection. for the &#8216;must be reachable crowd&#8217; the only real option is direct calls to landlines and cell phones.</p>
<p>i do see ribbit mobile as very interesting. but that is as a geek/hacker and an early adopter who has a strong interest in everything VOIP. most people like me(who i see as your biggest audience considering the features offered) are not going to spend $30.00 a month and would not find the free version feature rich enough to be interesting.</p>
<p>what would be very interesting is a sort of hosted PBX/VOIPswitch that includes your call routing to the VoIM networks and skype and perhaps the possibility of using voicemail and transcriptions at a flat rate annual fee. i would probably be willing to pay around a $100/year but not much more. but i would not need any PSTN termination or DID&#8217;s as long as the platform allowed flexibility it terms of SIP access for inbound and third party termination providers.</p>
<p>at least i would like to think that the free accounts after beta could use services like outbound PSTN calling on a per minute basis.</p>
<p>by the way is it possible to place SIP calls to a ribbit mobile account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristie Wells</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/#comment-229263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristie Wells]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78204#comment-229263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey &#039;anon&#039;: Ribbit Mobile will have a free/basic plan for users, so you can choose to role into that once we GA. The &#039;Pro&#039; package is geared toward individuals who feel being unavailable is unacceptable. Folks like me who cannot afford to miss a call (consultants, doctors, service people, etc.). Will we/they be willing to pay $30/month for it? Only time will tell. The key is to offer options so you can create the right plan for yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8216;anon&#8217;: Ribbit Mobile will have a free/basic plan for users, so you can choose to role into that once we GA. The &#8216;Pro&#8217; package is geared toward individuals who feel being unavailable is unacceptable. Folks like me who cannot afford to miss a call (consultants, doctors, service people, etc.). Will we/they be willing to pay $30/month for it? Only time will tell. The key is to offer options so you can create the right plan for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/#comment-229262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78204#comment-229262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the free trial looks great. you can use a SIP device and can get a free number in US. plus you have all sort of fancy call routing functions. but to get the full service after beta will be $30.00/month. they may find they have a very hard time converting beta users to paying users. especially since GV is free and offers much of the functionality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the free trial looks great. you can use a SIP device and can get a free number in US. plus you have all sort of fancy call routing functions. but to get the full service after beta will be $30.00/month. they may find they have a very hard time converting beta users to paying users. especially since GV is free and offers much of the functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/#comment-229261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Gibbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78204#comment-229261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, Lee. BT operates an MVNO on Vodafone&#039;s network in Italy and the UK but it is primarily known as a fixed-line operator. My mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Lee. BT operates an MVNO on Vodafone&#8217;s network in Italy and the UK but it is primarily known as a fixed-line operator. My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee S Dryburgh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/ribbit-mobiles-launch-shows-bts-strategy-isnt-just-all-talk/#comment-229260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee S Dryburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78204#comment-229260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get the basics right at least - BT is not a cellular operator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get the basics right at least &#8211; BT is not a cellular operator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
