<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype For Linux Going (Almost) Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/skype-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/skype-open-source/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OStatic Buffer Overflow&#8230; &#124; google android os blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/skype-open-source/#comment-229204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OStatic Buffer Overflow&#8230; &#124; google android os blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78091#comment-229204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for Linux going (almost) open source. The UI will be open, but not the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Linux going (almost) open source. The UI will be open, but not the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Goebel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/skype-open-source/#comment-229203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markus Goebel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78091#comment-229203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did Fonolo&#039;s Shai Berger say? Developers want to &quot;see Skype naked&quot;! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did Fonolo&#8217;s Shai Berger say? Developers want to &#8220;see Skype naked&#8221;! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/skype-open-source/#comment-229202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=78091#comment-229202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt; &quot;An open source version of the client could lead to Skype being embedded in non-PC devices.&quot;

Unless skype releases versions of its core closed-source library for the combination of CPU architectures/embedded OS (which is similar to what they&#039;re running away from by open sourcing the Linux client&#039;s UI), this is a pipe dream. Skype does have already an ARM-port but who knows whether they would make that available ...
Distributing binary libraries in the fragmented embedded Linux ecosystem is a difficult venture ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; &#8220;An open source version of the client could lead to Skype being embedded in non-PC devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unless skype releases versions of its core closed-source library for the combination of CPU architectures/embedded OS (which is similar to what they&#8217;re running away from by open sourcing the Linux client&#8217;s UI), this is a pipe dream. Skype does have already an ARM-port but who knows whether they would make that available &#8230;<br />
Distributing binary libraries in the fragmented embedded Linux ecosystem is a difficult venture &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

