<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dissension Festering in the Net Neutrality Ranks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/dissension-festering-in-the-net-neutrality-ranks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/dissension-festering-in-the-net-neutrality-ranks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype to FCC: Keep Internet Open &#38; Neutral &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/dissension-festering-in-the-net-neutrality-ranks/#comment-229212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype to FCC: Keep Internet Open &#38; Neutral &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78078#comment-229212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] up with a framework pertaining to broadband and wireless networks and issues of network neutrality. FCC&#8217;s has been seeking responses on the sensitive and divisive issues such as reasonable network [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up with a framework pertaining to broadband and wireless networks and issues of network neutrality. FCC&#8217;s has been seeking responses on the sensitive and divisive issues such as reasonable network [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ H</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/dissension-festering-in-the-net-neutrality-ranks/#comment-229211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RJ H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78078#comment-229211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So then the FCC should already be stepping up? There isn&#039;t a competitive market when you only get to choose from two players doing the exact same thing over different technologies. The fact is that the telecoms have divvied up the US and refuse to compete in each other&#039;s markets. Perhaps 4G rollouts *might* make a dent in company practices, but it&#039;s doubtful, considering the same telcos that want to fight net neutrality are also running our cell networks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then the FCC should already be stepping up? There isn&#8217;t a competitive market when you only get to choose from two players doing the exact same thing over different technologies. The fact is that the telecoms have divvied up the US and refuse to compete in each other&#8217;s markets. Perhaps 4G rollouts *might* make a dent in company practices, but it&#8217;s doubtful, considering the same telcos that want to fight net neutrality are also running our cell networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/dissension-festering-in-the-net-neutrality-ranks/#comment-229210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78078#comment-229210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are existing antitrust laws at both the state and federal levels for addressing anticompetitive behavior; we shouldn&#039;t require any new laws to make unlawful that which is already unlawful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are existing antitrust laws at both the state and federal levels for addressing anticompetitive behavior; we shouldn&#8217;t require any new laws to make unlawful that which is already unlawful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/dissension-festering-in-the-net-neutrality-ranks/#comment-229209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Glass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78078#comment-229209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only practices that the FCC should prohibit are anticompetitive ones. So long as there is a competitive market, customers will vote with their wallets and their feet and will keep companies honest. Government should not intervene except in the case of monopoly leverage (which ISPs do not have, but Google, for example, does).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only practices that the FCC should prohibit are anticompetitive ones. So long as there is a competitive market, customers will vote with their wallets and their feet and will keep companies honest. Government should not intervene except in the case of monopoly leverage (which ISPs do not have, but Google, for example, does).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian M</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/11/02/dissension-festering-in-the-net-neutrality-ranks/#comment-229208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=78078#comment-229208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an important piece of analysis because it acknowledges the value of having some sort of reasonable network management practice while elevating the challenge of making sure it isn&#039;t too big a loophole or too big a burden.

It makes one ask: is this an issue that is best dealt with by periodically smacking down an ISP or by trying to thread the needle on regulations like this? Given the FCC&#039;s lack of expertise in this area I think there is a lot of risk in letting the FCC regulate. It is a tough nut to crack.

Good post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an important piece of analysis because it acknowledges the value of having some sort of reasonable network management practice while elevating the challenge of making sure it isn&#8217;t too big a loophole or too big a burden.</p>
<p>It makes one ask: is this an issue that is best dealt with by periodically smacking down an ISP or by trying to thread the needle on regulations like this? Given the FCC&#8217;s lack of expertise in this area I think there is a lot of risk in letting the FCC regulate. It is a tough nut to crack.</p>
<p>Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
