<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-Blog: Mark Cuban on Participatory Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/30/re-blog-mark-cuban-on-participatory-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/30/re-blog-mark-cuban-on-participatory-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaFriends Blog &#171; Participatory media, engagement, and Social TV</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/30/re-blog-mark-cuban-on-participatory-media/#comment-477258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MediaFriends Blog &#171; Participatory media, engagement, and Social TV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=33897#comment-477258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] not to say the social potential for this medium is nothing.  NewTeeVee points out that &#8220;The participation may drop off as you move away from live [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not to say the social potential for this medium is nothing.  NewTeeVee points out that &#8220;The participation may drop off as you move away from live [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deverwarner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/30/re-blog-mark-cuban-on-participatory-media/#comment-477257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deverwarner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=33897#comment-477257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think he&#039;s right on. “Old” media has a lot to learn about driving participation and first-showing viewing of programming other than sports and reality competitions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://seedchange.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/shelf-life-participation-value-and-television/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If it were me, I’d be evaluating new programming options based on their potential in this regard, and I’d be approaching advertisers with ideas on how to get involved.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s easier said than done, but there’s no doubt in my mind that the right choices could lead to higher first-showing audiences, greater engagement, more effective advertisements, and higher rates.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he&#8217;s right on. “Old” media has a lot to learn about driving participation and first-showing viewing of programming other than sports and reality competitions.</p>
<p><a href="http://seedchange.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/shelf-life-participation-value-and-television/" rel="nofollow">http://seedchange.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/shelf-life-participation-value-and-television/</a></p>
<p>If it were me, I’d be evaluating new programming options based on their potential in this regard, and I’d be approaching advertisers with ideas on how to get involved.</p>
<p>It’s easier said than done, but there’s no doubt in my mind that the right choices could lead to higher first-showing audiences, greater engagement, more effective advertisements, and higher rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
