5 Comments

Summary:

It’s the last day of Embedda-Scare-A-Thon! Happy Halloween, y’all! If you’re a fan of British television, you’re likely familiar with the theory that every actor working in Britain today has either been in an episode of Doctor Who or Eastenders. Such a theory definitely applies to […]

It’s the last day of Embedda-Scare-A-Thon! Happy Halloween, y’all!

If you’re a fan of British television, you’re likely familiar with the theory that every actor working in Britain today has either been in an episode of Doctor Who or Eastenders. Such a theory definitely applies to the cast of the web thriller Girl Number 9, which launches today not just in the UK, but worldwide: Joe Absolom played Matthew in 157 episodes of Eastenders, Gareth David-Lloyd starred in the Doctor Who spin-off Torchwood and appeared in two episodes of its parent series, and Tracy-Ann Oberman is a two-fer with both Eastenders and Doctor Who credits under her belt.

Of course, Girl Number 9 doesn’t have much to do with time travel or East London; instead, creators James Moran (whose Doctor Who writing credits probably had something to do with casting) and Dan Turner have taken on the thriller genre. The set-up is simple: Two detectives are interrogating a psycho accused of murdering seven little girls, hoping to get a confession out of him. Instead, what they discover is that an eighth girl’s fate is not only on the line, but online via webcam.

It’s a plot twist that’s more than a little familiar — the serial killer’s last victim remains out there, and the detectives can see her via the Internet — but that appears to be the first twist, not the final one, of this series. And the entire series takes place in real time, adding an extra element of tension to the show’s 30-minute countdown, à la 24 — and also making the title’s meaning that much more intriguing, given how little time is left for us to learn about the last remaining girl.

Production values are pro, with appropriately moody and dramatic cinematography, and the dialogue is quick and witty — though punctuated almost excessively by profanity, as if the writer is glorying in the freedom allowed by self-distribution.

The series has also incorporated Twitter into its storytelling, with the lead-up to the show’s premiere occupied by back-and-forth conversations between its main characters. It’s not a groundbreaking use of microblogging at this point, and those tweeting could be interacting a little more with their followers. But notably, the conversations go back weeks, setting up an elaborate backstory for the characters before the series launch.

I’ll be honest and say that if this series had originated in Los Angeles or New York, with a cast and crew gathered from the American equivalents of those series, I would find it equally as intriguing, but otherwise not terribly exciting. However, its British origins mean that it might be the nation’s first high-caliber independent web drama — perhaps not a UK Dr. Horrible, but definitely a step forward for original web content. And for fans of British television denied iPlayer access, it’s definitely a win.

Scare-o-meter: 3 — Creepy in spurts, but no more creepy than your average episode of CSI.

  1. that movie must have good kind of plot . . . :-)

    Share
  2. I’ve been following the development of this series on twitter, and it’s a brilliant idea. The characters do interact with their followers and provide character development and backstory, but the webcast is supposed to be equally accessible to someone who didn’t follow on twitter. The profanity is pretty much what I would expect in any squad room with overworked, stressed detectives looking for a killer at large. I thought the first episode was excellent and look forward not only to the rest of the series, but more from James Moran, Dan Turner, Gareth David-LLoyd and Tracy-Ann Oberman. Well done!

    Share
  3. gosh I love the sci-fi channel’s version of doctor who – I finally found a place where I can catch every episode http://www.justdoctorwho.com … the best thing about it is not having alot of cash I can watch the episodes for free so it’s perfect for me.

    Share
  4. @LizM – how do you think this compares to KateModern?

    Share
    1. An excellent question! The difference is that this is a much more traditionally-executed narrative with no vlogging and a known cast, whereas “KateModern” was a pretty clear transplanting of the previously-established LG15 format. Also, most of those involved with “Girl Number 9″ already have established backgrounds in British TV, making this the equivalent of a web series starring, say, actors from “CSI” and “Lost” and written by a “Lost” writer. Which wouldn’t be too groundbreaking for America, but is new ground for the UK television industry.

      Share

Comments have been disabled for this post