<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As Phones Get Smarter, Browsing Booms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/29/as-phones-get-smarter-browsing-booms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/29/as-phones-get-smarter-browsing-booms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaitlin Beckman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/29/as-phones-get-smarter-browsing-booms/#comment-228627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaitlin Beckman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=77476#comment-228627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheer up. It WILL get better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheer up. It WILL get better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justa Notherguy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/29/as-phones-get-smarter-browsing-booms/#comment-228626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justa Notherguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=77476#comment-228626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tim:

No kidding. Android&#039;s share of browsing strikes me as remarkable, especially given both its limited time-in-market and relatively puny marketing expenditures. Not to forget that the only Android handset for most of the past year (the Dream/G1) looks offers little to those without a technical bent.

Tho few care to admit it, lots of folks buy a mobile based mainly on its appearance and perceived popularity...the &#039;cool factor&#039; vector, if you will. And, on that basis, iPhone makes the G1 look pretty sad. All the more astonishing that such a homely little spud - speaking as both a G1 owner and fan - is now the #3 smart phone, by share of on-line activity. Wow.

Meanwhile, am I the only one surprised by the huge chunk of HTC&#039;s activity (==90%?) represented by Android handsets? I mean, with HTC selling a few millions of WinMo units where are all of those users? From looking at AdMob&#039;s data, it would seem they spend even less time on-line than do Blackberry users. More evidence for this article&#039;s thesis, I s&#039;pose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim:</p>
<p>No kidding. Android&#8217;s share of browsing strikes me as remarkable, especially given both its limited time-in-market and relatively puny marketing expenditures. Not to forget that the only Android handset for most of the past year (the Dream/G1) looks offers little to those without a technical bent.</p>
<p>Tho few care to admit it, lots of folks buy a mobile based mainly on its appearance and perceived popularity&#8230;the &#8216;cool factor&#8217; vector, if you will. And, on that basis, iPhone makes the G1 look pretty sad. All the more astonishing that such a homely little spud &#8211; speaking as both a G1 owner and fan &#8211; is now the #3 smart phone, by share of on-line activity. Wow.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, am I the only one surprised by the huge chunk of HTC&#8217;s activity (==90%?) represented by Android handsets? I mean, with HTC selling a few millions of WinMo units where are all of those users? From looking at AdMob&#8217;s data, it would seem they spend even less time on-line than do Blackberry users. More evidence for this article&#8217;s thesis, I s&#8217;pose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/29/as-phones-get-smarter-browsing-booms/#comment-228625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=77476#comment-228625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(but it&#039;s not all smartphones on those charts) wow, quite a significant share for Android- it hasn&#039;t even been heavily marketed yet. Smartphones for everyone are finally here, the age of the featuresphone is passing away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(but it&#8217;s not all smartphones on those charts) wow, quite a significant share for Android- it hasn&#8217;t even been heavily marketed yet. Smartphones for everyone are finally here, the age of the featuresphone is passing away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shyamster</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/29/as-phones-get-smarter-browsing-booms/#comment-228624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shyamster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=77476#comment-228624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting to note RIM&#039;s position in this list.  Clearly folks that use a Blackberry do very little beyond email.  Blackberry&#039;s are still email phones and not smartphones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note RIM&#8217;s position in this list.  Clearly folks that use a Blackberry do very little beyond email.  Blackberry&#8217;s are still email phones and not smartphones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
