A criminal investigation has been launched against senior executives of YouTube and parent company Google in Hamburg, Germany, over allegations of copyright infringement, according to media reports from that country. The case started after a complaint by German music rights holders; Hamburg’s prosecutor has formally requested […]

A criminal investigation has been launched against senior executives of YouTube and parent company Google in Hamburg, Germany, over allegations of copyright infringement, according to media reports from that country. The case started after a complaint by German music rights holders; Hamburg’s prosecutor has formally requested assistance from U.S. colleagues to compel YouTube to produce log files identifying who uploaded as well as who viewed 500 specific videos.

It’s unclear if the investigation will ever result in an actual court case. German prosecutors routinely throw out criminal investigations against copyright infringement, leaving it up to the parties involved to pursue civil lawsuits or settle out of court. The case does, however, once again demonstrate that Viacom’s massive one billion-dollar lawsuit isn’t the only copyright dispute Google has to tackle. There are regularly lawsuits all around the globe accusing YouTube and Google as running a worldwide video platform. Indeed, at a time when fragmented rights and universal access continue to collide, not irking rights holders seems impossible.

The current investigation started as the result of a formal complaint by Hamburg-based lawyer Jens Schippmann, who represents 25 German musicians, producers and music publishers. Schippmann sued Google in civil court earlier this year, alleging that videos of his clients have been viewed more that 125 million times without any compensation. Schippmann now alleges that Google didn’t respond to requests to take down more that 8,000 videos and that his clients were denied access to the company’s Content ID Program. He also claimed that users would utilize YouTube as a kind of “covert file-sharing platform,” tagging his clients videos with keywords like “album quality” to encourage downloading.

Google strongly objected to these claims, according to a report by German IT news site Netzwelt.de. German Google spokesperson Henning Dorstewitz rejected the idea that executives or other employees of Google or YouTube were committing criminal acts of infringement. “We cooperate with thousands of rights holders across the globe,” Dorstewitz told Netzwelt.

He was undoubtedly referring to Google’s Content ID system, which is able to identity songs used in videos based on audio fingerprinting technologies, among other things. Google recently told us that more than a thousand rights holders have utilized Content ID to date, with the total number of reference files used to identify rights holders’ works now being north of a million. Content ID makes it possible to flag certain videos or songs used in videos for takedown, but rights holders can also elect to keep these videos up and instead monetize them through advertising. These decisions can be country-specific, making it possible, for example, to monetize content in the U.S. and take it down in other countries.

Content ID hasn’t stopped rights holders around the globe from crossing swords with Google. Part of the problem is that music rights are extraordinarily complicated, with many different parties owning rights to the same song based on the type of use as well as the territory. One example: Licensing talks between the German music rights group GEMA and YouTube broke down this spring. German YouTube users have not only had to go without countless videos featuring songs licensed by GEMA ever since, but they won’t be able to watch U2’s YouTube concert that will be streamed live by the site this Sunday, either.

However, the current criminal investigation wouldn’t go away even if Google and GEMA made up tomorrow. The rights holders represented by Schippmann only signed over certain rights to GEMA and instead decided to go after Google by themselves.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. The world wide web being so huge, it will be almost impossible to curtail such infringement rights.Or a new world law will need to be implemented.

    1. That is true, there is no controlling this, once a site gets shut down, another one will pop up.

  2. silner (silner) ‘s status on Saturday, 24-Oct-09 17:05:26 UTC – Identi.ca Saturday, October 24, 2009
  3. Good luck with that…

    Google and Youtube are about as big as IBM these days. If need be, they could darken the skies of Germany with lawyers.

    Together, Google and Youtube have a system in place to assist rights holders. The fact that the rights holders were not able to gain access to this system, tells me that they TOO STUPID to use a computer. ;)


  4. Law is law, youtube must paid german artist!

  5. Criminal case? Just one more reason for the 125 million viewers to never visit Germany, since they’d likely never know if there were an outstanding arrest warrant.

  6. The videos were viewed 125 million times and no compensation received? How about exposing your music to potentially 125 million new fans that might actually go out and spend money to purchase your entire album based on a 30-second, low-quality clip on YouTube? How about getting your name and reputation out to 125 million people who will then tell their friends about you and your band? That’s some of the best compensation an artist could ever hope for! Are they actually afraid that a crappy streaming video is really going to become a viable substitute for the actual album, be it an actual CD or tracks purchased from iTunes?

  7. Web News and Practical websites » German musicians sue YouTube, their own fans Monday, October 26, 2009

    [...] group of 25 publishers, producers and musicians are asking that YouTube hand over server logs showing who uploaded, as well as watched, their [...]

  8. YouTube a braços com a justiça alemã | Remixtures Monday, October 26, 2009

    [...] Contudo, na altura Schippmann aproveitou ainda para avisar que tinha sido contactado por outros profissionais da indústria musical alemã que estavam preocupados com o facto das suas obras estarem a ser usadas pela YouTube. Dito e feito, no final da semana passada ficámos a saber que não só Schipmann apresentou uma série de queixas-crime adicionais contra a YouTube e a Google como também que o procurador de Hamburgo decidiu iniciar uma investigação criminal. [...]

  9. RE: Jason W. I agree Jason 100%. There is a great force within YouTube and its in the form of 100% free and undivided advertising. And like you said. 125 million people. Maybe even more than that which is a low number if you consider how many video syndicates there are. And when a video goes viral, its all over with. YouTube is so popular how could they ever begin to police their site to delete every single video that had a split second of music or video within it that was owned by a network or a music publisher. I think any publicity is good publicity and it all ultimately equals extra exposure. Period.

  10. fnords afm08 « /dev/blog Wednesday, October 28, 2009

    [...] Németországban azért perlik a Youtube-ot, hogy adja ki néhány letöltő személyazonosságát. A szomorú az, hogy a Google bejelentésre eltávolít jogtalan anyagot. Ebben az esetben a jogtulajdonos ezt elmulasztotta, így állítva csapdát a fogyasztóknak. [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post