<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Approves Another VoIP App, Rebtel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rebtel doesn&#039;t offer VoIP over 3G on iPhone. That&#039;s a simple fact.
The application initiates 2 calling legs. One is setup directly to a fixedline number via a normal GSM call, the other one is setup by calling the other party over PSTN.

The are exactly the same as Jahjah. Only the way how it&#039;s presented is different.

So in other words to be clear: There is no VoIP traffic going from the iPhone over 3G data pipeline and connects to a server to terminate the VoIP call to a PSTN / normal phone number.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebtel doesn&#8217;t offer VoIP over 3G on iPhone. That&#8217;s a simple fact.<br />
The application initiates 2 calling legs. One is setup directly to a fixedline number via a normal GSM call, the other one is setup by calling the other party over PSTN.</p>
<p>The are exactly the same as Jahjah. Only the way how it&#8217;s presented is different.</p>
<p>So in other words to be clear: There is no VoIP traffic going from the iPhone over 3G data pipeline and connects to a server to terminate the VoIP call to a PSTN / normal phone number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vechog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vechog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly ! I think AT&amp;T hasn&#039;t really opened 3G for VOIP. Both Vonage and Rebtel seem to be using voice call to their local access number which then forwards the call to the number you desire.  3G is only used for call setup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly ! I think AT&amp;T hasn&#8217;t really opened 3G for VOIP. Both Vonage and Rebtel seem to be using voice call to their local access number which then forwards the call to the number you desire.  3G is only used for call setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Drewniak</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Drewniak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Craik Pyke Yes, that&#039;s correct.

@user, GigaOM We describe it as being a VoIP App as we do still route the international leg of the call over VoIP. However, I do agree with you that there is no VoIP involved per se from the users point of view.

Also, let me reiterate that what Apple considers as being VoIP and what an end users actually is exposed to are, as you know, two different things. Our 6-7 months waiting time for approval surely is a testament to that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Craik Pyke Yes, that&#8217;s correct.</p>
<p>@user, GigaOM We describe it as being a VoIP App as we do still route the international leg of the call over VoIP. However, I do agree with you that there is no VoIP involved per se from the users point of view.</p>
<p>Also, let me reiterate that what Apple considers as being VoIP and what an end users actually is exposed to are, as you know, two different things. Our 6-7 months waiting time for approval surely is a testament to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: user</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[user]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is everyone (not just this site - dozens of them) reporting it as a voip app? From the description of the app, they give you a local number to call and you use that to call your intended destination. Does this mean the address book is a voip app? It helps you make phone calls too. Of course the address book is not voip app.

There is no voip involved (from the user point of view). I can’t believe so many sites repost this inaccurate stuff without checking the details.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone (not just this site &#8211; dozens of them) reporting it as a voip app? From the description of the app, they give you a local number to call and you use that to call your intended destination. Does this mean the address book is a voip app? It helps you make phone calls too. Of course the address book is not voip app.</p>
<p>There is no voip involved (from the user point of view). I can’t believe so many sites repost this inaccurate stuff without checking the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Approves Another VoIP App, Rebtel &#171; Chicago Mac/PC Support</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Approves Another VoIP App, Rebtel &#171; Chicago Mac/PC Support]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 19, 2009 by chimac    Its a VoIP party at the Apple Store.  Click here to learn more about this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 19, 2009 by chimac    Its a VoIP party at the Apple Store.  Click here to learn more about this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veggiedude</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[veggiedude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Voice does not do VoIP. Its competitor, RingCentral, is available in the app store, but even RingCentral does not offer  VoIP, even though VoIP is one of their core services. RingCentral has another app, known as &#039;AT&amp;T Virtual Receptionist&#039; under the ATT brand, and it does what Google Voice does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Voice does not do VoIP. Its competitor, RingCentral, is available in the app store, but even RingCentral does not offer  VoIP, even though VoIP is one of their core services. RingCentral has another app, known as &#8216;AT&amp;T Virtual Receptionist&#8217; under the ATT brand, and it does what Google Voice does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craik Pyke</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craik Pyke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the bottom line, inferring from your post, is Rebtel creates a circuit side connection between the mobile and your local &quot;service node&quot;, and you then route the bulk of the session over a packet infrastructure - correct?

In other words, you&#039;re not creating a packet side connection to the mobile, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the bottom line, inferring from your post, is Rebtel creates a circuit side connection between the mobile and your local &#8220;service node&#8221;, and you then route the bulk of the session over a packet infrastructure &#8211; correct?</p>
<p>In other words, you&#8217;re not creating a packet side connection to the mobile, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Drewniak</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Drewniak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tony Yes, in it&#039;s current iteration our App works by setting up the call and routing it over VoIP.

@Manor We identified a bug late last week relating to OTA contact sync. Unfortunately is causes the App to crash but an update is on it&#039;s way.
I would highly appreciate if I could get in touch with you to get the details of the crash. Want to make sure this actually does relate to that specific bug we identified and not something else. I&#039;m alexander [dot] drewniak [at] rebtel [dot] com

Thanks in advance!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony Yes, in it&#8217;s current iteration our App works by setting up the call and routing it over VoIP.</p>
<p>@Manor We identified a bug late last week relating to OTA contact sync. Unfortunately is causes the App to crash but an update is on it&#8217;s way.<br />
I would highly appreciate if I could get in touch with you to get the details of the crash. Want to make sure this actually does relate to that specific bug we identified and not something else. I&#8217;m alexander [dot] drewniak [at] rebtel [dot] com</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Todd

We have been looking for some actual proof of that including photos and Google is being pretty tight lipped about it. If it is anything like the Android experience, I am not surprised Apple is pushing them down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd</p>
<p>We have been looking for some actual proof of that including photos and Google is being pretty tight lipped about it. If it is anything like the Android experience, I am not surprised Apple is pushing them down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/19/rebtel-iphone/#comment-227292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=75417#comment-227292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
