<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Want to Boost LTE Signals? AlcaLu Says More Power to You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/want-to-boost-lte-signals-alcalu-says-more-power-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/want-to-boost-lte-signals-alcalu-says-more-power-to-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kelley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/want-to-boost-lte-signals-alcalu-says-more-power-to-you/#comment-226943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74851#comment-226943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they are combining the uplink signal somewhere upstream in the network? That&#039;s how CDMA has always worked in the uplink while in &quot;softhandoff&quot;, except the packets are not combined, but &quot;selected&quot; (using a selector bank subsystem).  that will effectively double the backhaul requirements since the same unique datastream will need to be transmitted/received from multiple non-co-located base stations.  maybe they save 3 dB -5 dB of transmit power?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they are combining the uplink signal somewhere upstream in the network? That&#8217;s how CDMA has always worked in the uplink while in &#8220;softhandoff&#8221;, except the packets are not combined, but &#8220;selected&#8221; (using a selector bank subsystem).  that will effectively double the backhaul requirements since the same unique datastream will need to be transmitted/received from multiple non-co-located base stations.  maybe they save 3 dB -5 dB of transmit power?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

