<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TweetDeck Just Keeps Getting Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khuram Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khuram Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say, though i&#039;ve always liked Tweetdeck from day one, i wasnt overly impressed with the iteration cycle. They seem to be asleep for quite a while. So i dont know if its competition from Seesmic, or Tweetie thats made the take it up a gear or what, but they seem to be very much on the ball and are certainly giving the users what they want, which i always like to see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, though i&#8217;ve always liked Tweetdeck from day one, i wasnt overly impressed with the iteration cycle. They seem to be asleep for quite a while. So i dont know if its competition from Seesmic, or Tweetie thats made the take it up a gear or what, but they seem to be very much on the ball and are certainly giving the users what they want, which i always like to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Martinez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll have to try this out. I only have one Twitter account and TweetDeck does the trick. Does anyone else have this problem and think Seesmic is better?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to try this out. I only have one Twitter account and TweetDeck does the trick. Does anyone else have this problem and think Seesmic is better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, they totally ripped Digsby&#039;s twitter popups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, they totally ripped Digsby&#8217;s twitter popups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maidenfine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maidenfine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still waiting for them to add the ability to schedule tweets. As it is, I have to use a seperate program for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for them to add the ability to schedule tweets. As it is, I have to use a seperate program for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moshe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When are we going to be able to increase the font size?! That is a feature I really need!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are we going to be able to increase the font size?! That is a feature I really need!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While these improvements sound intriguing, my biggest problem with Tweetdeck is that you have to have a separate column open for regular updates, mentions, and DMs. If you only have 1 or 2 accounts, that&#039;s not a big deal. But if you have more than that, you&#039;re looking at more than 9 columns to shuffle through.

I still like Seesmic Desktop better. It has one column per account, in which you can switch between updates, mentions, and DMs. Much less confusing, and much easier to navigate around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While these improvements sound intriguing, my biggest problem with Tweetdeck is that you have to have a separate column open for regular updates, mentions, and DMs. If you only have 1 or 2 accounts, that&#8217;s not a big deal. But if you have more than that, you&#8217;re looking at more than 9 columns to shuffle through.</p>
<p>I still like Seesmic Desktop better. It has one column per account, in which you can switch between updates, mentions, and DMs. Much less confusing, and much easier to navigate around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Falken</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Falken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t like the idea of AIR but I&#039;ve had no problems with using it. If it enables useful applications, I&#039;m not going to worry too much about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t like the idea of AIR but I&#8217;ve had no problems with using it. If it enables useful applications, I&#8217;m not going to worry too much about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Wickert</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miguel Wickert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when I thought it couldn&#039;t get any better. I&#039;d loved to see TweetDeck on Android. Thanks for sharing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I thought it couldn&#8217;t get any better. I&#8217;d loved to see TweetDeck on Android. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usually Named</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/15/tweetdeck-just-keeps-getting-better/#comment-226944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Usually Named]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=74852#comment-226944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But still based on Adobe AIR? FAIL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But still based on Adobe AIR? FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
