<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple Mobile Devices = Increased Spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/multiple-mobile-devices-increased-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/multiple-mobile-devices-increased-spending/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raffy F.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/multiple-mobile-devices-increased-spending/#comment-226156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raffy F.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73640#comment-226156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;When it comes to cutting the cost, I am suggesting one particular phone for the elderly that is very helpful to this. It’s the Just5 phone. Just5 phone is a very plain phone but it is loaded with valuable features. Its features are actually more of a need than a luxury, especially to the older adults.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, I am saying that this phone can effectively help its users to cut-off their spending on a wireless device such as this is simply because this is offered at a very reasonable cost. In addition to that, this is phone does not come with a contract so its users have nothing to worry at all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh by the way! I believe that a lot of individuals out there are interested to secure a phone that is of high quality yet inexpensive. So, let me clarify that Just5 phone is perfect for almost anyone particularly to the technophobe or disabled individuals. Its attractiveness can certainly further boosts the pride of the youngsters who are going to use this phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.just5.com&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to cutting the cost, I am suggesting one particular phone for the elderly that is very helpful to this. It’s the Just5 phone. Just5 phone is a very plain phone but it is loaded with valuable features. Its features are actually more of a need than a luxury, especially to the older adults.</p>
<p>Now, I am saying that this phone can effectively help its users to cut-off their spending on a wireless device such as this is simply because this is offered at a very reasonable cost. In addition to that, this is phone does not come with a contract so its users have nothing to worry at all.</p>
<p>Oh by the way! I believe that a lot of individuals out there are interested to secure a phone that is of high quality yet inexpensive. So, let me clarify that Just5 phone is perfect for almost anyone particularly to the technophobe or disabled individuals. Its attractiveness can certainly further boosts the pride of the youngsters who are going to use this phone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.just5.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.just5.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Carriers Be Big Players in the Internet of Things?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/multiple-mobile-devices-increased-spending/#comment-226155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Carriers Be Big Players in the Internet of Things?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73640#comment-226155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] smartphones, but increasingly, people are buying other types of devices with wireless capabilities; the average U.S. or Canadian consumer has 1.3 cellular connections, for example. Smartphones are the obvious leader of the pack in terms of sheer numbers &#8212; [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] smartphones, but increasingly, people are buying other types of devices with wireless capabilities; the average U.S. or Canadian consumer has 1.3 cellular connections, for example. Smartphones are the obvious leader of the pack in terms of sheer numbers &#8212; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multiple Handset Ownership Among US and Canada Users @ Tech Crunchies &#8211; Internet Statistics and Numbers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/multiple-mobile-devices-increased-spending/#comment-226154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Multiple Handset Ownership Among US and Canada Users @ Tech Crunchies &#8211; Internet Statistics and Numbers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73640#comment-226154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] than one device for communication. The Average North American had 1.3 cellular device with them. Here&#8217;s how the numbers are inside the two [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than one device for communication. The Average North American had 1.3 cellular device with them. Here&#8217;s how the numbers are inside the two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Bone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/multiple-mobile-devices-increased-spending/#comment-226153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73640#comment-226153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And for every one of these economic illiterates who is letting their income, their capital, their retirements be sucked away through subscription serfdom, how many of us have none of these devices precisely because we have chose not to?

The market may not be as unsaturated as you think. Not every American is an unthinking consumerist bovine. Anything leased instead of purchased, any service bought on a subscription basis rather than self-provided is money lost forever to someone else, usually someone far richer than you.

No wonder this country is going broke. To be a capitalist nation you have to capital -- and that means money in savings instruments instead of subscription-based gadgets in pockets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for every one of these economic illiterates who is letting their income, their capital, their retirements be sucked away through subscription serfdom, how many of us have none of these devices precisely because we have chose not to?</p>
<p>The market may not be as unsaturated as you think. Not every American is an unthinking consumerist bovine. Anything leased instead of purchased, any service bought on a subscription basis rather than self-provided is money lost forever to someone else, usually someone far richer than you.</p>
<p>No wonder this country is going broke. To be a capitalist nation you have to capital &#8212; and that means money in savings instruments instead of subscription-based gadgets in pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
