<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#039;s Captastic! Cable One Embraces Congestion Pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Predictions 2011: If Pay-Per-Use Comes to Broadband, Then What?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-548289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Predictions 2011: If Pay-Per-Use Comes to Broadband, Then What?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 02:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-548289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A number of cities have instituted dynamic congestion-based pricing for tolls and roads, and it has been proposed to do the same for the Internet. Simplified congestion pricing might mean free nights and weekends. They knew to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A number of cities have instituted dynamic congestion-based pricing for tolls and roads, and it has been proposed to do the same for the Internet. Simplified congestion pricing might mean free nights and weekends. They knew to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Predictions 2011: If Pay-Per-Use Comes to Broadband, Then What? : Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-548172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Predictions 2011: If Pay-Per-Use Comes to Broadband, Then What? : Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-548172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A number of cities have instituted dynamic congestion-based pricing for tolls and roads, and it has been proposed to do the same for the Internet. Simplified congestion pricing might mean free nights and weekends. They knew to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A number of cities have instituted dynamic congestion-based pricing for tolls and roads, and it has been proposed to do the same for the Internet. Simplified congestion pricing might mean free nights and weekends. They knew to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Exec: Stop Streaming, Dammit! &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT&#38;T Exec: Stop Streaming, Dammit! &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Carriers are increasingly turning to technologies like Wi-Fi and femtocells to help offload the increasing traffic, but operators will likely also abandon their flat-rate pricing models in favor of congestion pricing. A consumer who uses mobile data primarily for email on the phone, for instance, could opt for 200kbps service while a netbook-toting road warrior could be asked to shell out for a 1.5Mbps connection. And connectivity could vary not just by user but also by use case, giving consumers the flexibility to pay more when they need a lot of data quickly or during peak hours. Cable operators and a handful of European ISPs are already toying with such models. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carriers are increasingly turning to technologies like Wi-Fi and femtocells to help offload the increasing traffic, but operators will likely also abandon their flat-rate pricing models in favor of congestion pricing. A consumer who uses mobile data primarily for email on the phone, for instance, could opt for 200kbps service while a netbook-toting road warrior could be asked to shell out for a 1.5Mbps connection. And connectivity could vary not just by user but also by use case, giving consumers the flexibility to pay more when they need a lot of data quickly or during peak hours. Cable operators and a handful of European ISPs are already toying with such models. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNC-2009-10-08 #518 Back in Honolulu Next Show!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GNC-2009-10-08 #518 Back in Honolulu Next Show!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Battery! Urban Radio at 87.7! Vue Video! Do you like iHop? Archos5 available on Amazon! Dow Solar! Cable One will slow network speeds during peak hours? Why New Media works! Lawmakers want probe of Google Voice! 128 Bit Windows. Worldwide arrest in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Battery! Urban Radio at 87.7! Vue Video! Do you like iHop? Archos5 available on Amazon! Dow Solar! Cable One will slow network speeds during peak hours? Why New Media works! Lawmakers want probe of Google Voice! 128 Bit Windows. Worldwide arrest in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spanky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spanky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m on Cableone. i&#039;ve read their terms quite a few times and its my understanding that the daily cap is 3GB/day (total of both up and down) for the 5mb/500kb speed and 5GB/day for the 10mb/1mb speed.

plus, you have data limits of 2.2GB down and 225MB up(in the 5mb plan) for the noon to midnight time frame. if you exceed this, then your speed is cut in half from 4PM to midnight.

for 10mb plan, its 4.5GB/ 450MB during the noon to midnight time frame.

so its two caps, two caps, two caps in one!!

a daily cap and a noon to midnight cap.

isn&#039;t Freedom great!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m on Cableone. i&#8217;ve read their terms quite a few times and its my understanding that the daily cap is 3GB/day (total of both up and down) for the 5mb/500kb speed and 5GB/day for the 10mb/1mb speed.</p>
<p>plus, you have data limits of 2.2GB down and 225MB up(in the 5mb plan) for the noon to midnight time frame. if you exceed this, then your speed is cut in half from 4PM to midnight.</p>
<p>for 10mb plan, its 4.5GB/ 450MB during the noon to midnight time frame.</p>
<p>so its two caps, two caps, two caps in one!!</p>
<p>a daily cap and a noon to midnight cap.</p>
<p>isn&#8217;t Freedom great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Net Neutrality would eliminate the ISPs ability to play the &quot;we are not a utility, but we are a utility&quot; game.

Example: Your local electric company is prohibited from singling out certain people who use a lot of electricity and charging them a higher rate - beyond illegal. Electric companies must answer to QoS, but there are no caps and no tiered pricing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Net Neutrality would eliminate the ISPs ability to play the &#8220;we are not a utility, but we are a utility&#8221; game.</p>
<p>Example: Your local electric company is prohibited from singling out certain people who use a lot of electricity and charging them a higher rate &#8211; beyond illegal. Electric companies must answer to QoS, but there are no caps and no tiered pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Todd, you got it wrong.  Passing Net Neutrality will cause *more* of the above pricing schemes.  If providers can&#039;t apply QoS to their network, their only choice will be to implement caps and tiered data plans.  Be careful what you wish for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Todd, you got it wrong.  Passing Net Neutrality will cause *more* of the above pricing schemes.  If providers can&#8217;t apply QoS to their network, their only choice will be to implement caps and tiered data plans.  Be careful what you wish for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any of you guys know what Cable One is charging for their broadband service.  I was trying to see how they compare to others and if their rates for &quot;extended &amp; standard&quot; was any better/worse than &quot;normal&quot; High Speed Internet pricing.

thx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any of you guys know what Cable One is charging for their broadband service.  I was trying to see how they compare to others and if their rates for &#8220;extended &amp; standard&#8221; was any better/worse than &#8220;normal&#8221; High Speed Internet pricing.</p>
<p>thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Dampier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip Dampier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, Net Neutrality will not prohibit Internet Overcharging schemes like this.  We need to pass Rep. Eric Massa&#039;s Broadband Internet Fairness Act (HR 2902).  You can read more about this legislation here: http://stopthecap.com/take-action-2/

We&#039;ve also written up Cable ONE on Stop the Cap!, which is dedicated to stopping Internet Overcharging schemes wherever they show up.

We -do- need Net Neutrality protection passed as well.  Interestingly, the Washington Post, which has been slamming Net Neutrality in repeated articles for at least the last two weeks, just happens to OWN Cable ONE.  Funny how they forgot to mention their conflict of interest in their editorials on Net Neutrality.

We&#039;re still in the fight and watching.  The BS Brigade of groups fighting against consumer interests are assembling, including the atrocious Broadband for America (Corporate Interests).  We just completed a major expose on all 100+ members, which are infested from floor to ceiling with telecommunications executives, board members, and the equipment manufacturers that supply them.

Check this out: http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/02/special-report-astroturf-overload-broadband-for-america-one-giant-industry-front-group/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Net Neutrality will not prohibit Internet Overcharging schemes like this.  We need to pass Rep. Eric Massa&#8217;s Broadband Internet Fairness Act (HR 2902).  You can read more about this legislation here: <a href="http://stopthecap.com/take-action-2/" rel="nofollow">http://stopthecap.com/take-action-2/</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve also written up Cable ONE on Stop the Cap!, which is dedicated to stopping Internet Overcharging schemes wherever they show up.</p>
<p>We -do- need Net Neutrality protection passed as well.  Interestingly, the Washington Post, which has been slamming Net Neutrality in repeated articles for at least the last two weeks, just happens to OWN Cable ONE.  Funny how they forgot to mention their conflict of interest in their editorials on Net Neutrality.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re still in the fight and watching.  The BS Brigade of groups fighting against consumer interests are assembling, including the atrocious Broadband for America (Corporate Interests).  We just completed a major expose on all 100+ members, which are infested from floor to ceiling with telecommunications executives, board members, and the equipment manufacturers that supply them.</p>
<p>Check this out: <a href="http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/02/special-report-astroturf-overload-broadband-for-america-one-giant-industry-front-group/" rel="nofollow">http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/02/special-report-astroturf-overload-broadband-for-america-one-giant-industry-front-group/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/08/its-captastic-cable-one-embraces-congestion-pricing/#comment-226144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=73599#comment-226144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proof the &quot;what if&quot; scenarios of not passing Net Neutrality, wrongly dismissed as FUD, are all true.

It&#039;s not too late, cite the above atrocity and e-mail/call your congressional representatives immediately

https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=345]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proof the &#8220;what if&#8221; scenarios of not passing Net Neutrality, wrongly dismissed as FUD, are all true.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not too late, cite the above atrocity and e-mail/call your congressional representatives immediately</p>
<p><a href="https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&#038;page=UserAction&#038;id=345" rel="nofollow">https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&#038;page=UserAction&#038;id=345</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
