<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T to Allow VoIP Calls Over 3G Network; Skype Fans Rejoice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Brings 3G VoIP to the iPhone &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Brings 3G VoIP to the iPhone &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] in October, AT&amp;T said it would allow VoIP over its 3G network. While some doubt that VoIP on the iPhone will be a great experience, some just want to see it [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in October, AT&amp;T said it would allow VoIP over its 3G network. While some doubt that VoIP on the iPhone will be a great experience, some just want to see it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone &#38; The Lack of Voice over 3G: Alternative Theory &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone &#38; The Lack of Voice over 3G: Alternative Theory &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] iPhone &amp; The Lack of Voice over 3G: Alternative&#160;Theory   By Om Malik Jan. 19, 2010, 2:45pm No Comments   0 0 0 0   Apple and AT&amp;T have come under continued criticism for not allowing VoIP over today&#8217;s 3G mobile broadband connections when using the iPhone. So much so that the matter got the attention of the FCC back in August, leading to explanations  from Apple and the Ma Bell. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPhone &amp; The Lack of Voice over 3G: Alternative&nbsp;Theory   By Om Malik Jan. 19, 2010, 2:45pm No Comments   0 0 0 0   Apple and AT&amp;T have come under continued criticism for not allowing VoIP over today&#8217;s 3G mobile broadband connections when using the iPhone. So much so that the matter got the attention of the FCC back in August, leading to explanations  from Apple and the Ma Bell. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t either. So what&#039;s up. I have the latest os&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t either. So what&#8217;s up. I have the latest os</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t make calls using Skype over the 3G network. What do I have to do to enable it?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t make calls using Skype over the 3G network. What do I have to do to enable it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Observations: Openness - November 18, 2009</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Observations: Openness - November 18, 2009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] AT&amp;T to Allow VoIP Calls Over 3G Network [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AT&#038;T to Allow VoIP Calls Over 3G Network [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On iPhone, Apple Still Not Allowing VoIP Calls over 3G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[On iPhone, Apple Still Not Allowing VoIP Calls over 3G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to find out why Nimbuzz didn&#8217;t work over the 3G connection? After all, it was a few weeks ago AT&amp;T had announced support for VoIP over 3G with much fanfare, a move that was widely applauded including kudos from FCC [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to find out why Nimbuzz didn&#8217;t work over the 3G connection? After all, it was a few weeks ago AT&amp;T had announced support for VoIP over 3G with much fanfare, a move that was widely applauded including kudos from FCC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Approves Another VoIP App, Rebtel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Approves Another VoIP App, Rebtel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in my experience, WiFi-based calling is always better. AT&amp;T announced earlier this year that it was going to permit VoIP calls over its 3G data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in my experience, WiFi-based calling is always better. AT&amp;T announced earlier this year that it was going to permit VoIP calls over its 3G data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Kerton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Kerton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allowing VoIP, and general &quot;openness&quot; was going to be a big competitive advantage of all Android phones, so Android loses some advantage vs.iPhones.

Though I agree with you. I think that Google will be happy. Their disruptive introduction of Android is opening up the whole market, so their apps will have more freedom on iPhones, as well as Android phones. That just means more advertising revenues for them.

Apple forced carriers to be more open than they had been. Now Android is forcing Apple to be more open then they had been. The ratchet effect of competition is working in the right direction.

Consumers: a big win for competition. I love to watch ATT/Apple square off against all comers. Both sides must keep getting better, or lose ground. These are awesome times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allowing VoIP, and general &#8220;openness&#8221; was going to be a big competitive advantage of all Android phones, so Android loses some advantage vs.iPhones.</p>
<p>Though I agree with you. I think that Google will be happy. Their disruptive introduction of Android is opening up the whole market, so their apps will have more freedom on iPhones, as well as Android phones. That just means more advertising revenues for them.</p>
<p>Apple forced carriers to be more open than they had been. Now Android is forcing Apple to be more open then they had been. The ratchet effect of competition is working in the right direction.</p>
<p>Consumers: a big win for competition. I love to watch ATT/Apple square off against all comers. Both sides must keep getting better, or lose ground. These are awesome times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voice Is Dead or Long Live Voice?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Voice Is Dead or Long Live Voice?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GigaOM Pro, Sub required: AT&amp;T, Verizon grudgingly move towards openness.) 2. AT&amp;T said it will allow Internet voice services such as Skype to run over its 3G networks, even though it will significantly impact its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GigaOM Pro, Sub required: AT&amp;T, Verizon grudgingly move towards openness.) 2. AT&amp;T said it will allow Internet voice services such as Skype to run over its 3G networks, even though it will significantly impact its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New eBay: Bland, But Thriving</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The New eBay: Bland, But Thriving]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]     The past week was one of the best eBay has seen in a long time. AT&amp;T said it will soon allow VoIP calls over its 3G network, a move that will boost Skype’s allure as eBay moves to sell it. And a federal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]     The past week was one of the best eBay has seen in a long time. AT&amp;T said it will soon allow VoIP calls over its 3G network, a move that will boost Skype’s allure as eBay moves to sell it. And a federal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libran Lover</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Libran Lover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NO! This is just proof that the mere threat of net neutrality regulation can produce SOME result. Imagine how much more might happen if neutrality rules were actually on the books &amp; there was real competition!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO! This is just proof that the mere threat of net neutrality regulation can produce SOME result. Imagine how much more might happen if neutrality rules were actually on the books &amp; there was real competition!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuvamani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuvamani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend tried a skype 3g call on a old htc winmo phone (the tilt) on ATT 3g (funny how WinMo is more open) . Anyway the quality sucked big time. And from the looks of it the processor matters quite a bit for a low bandwidth connection like 3G.

The iPhone 3GS has a nice processor, so we may have better luck now, but then the quality of data on the At&amp;T network has only degraded so we may not be so lucky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend tried a skype 3g call on a old htc winmo phone (the tilt) on ATT 3g (funny how WinMo is more open) . Anyway the quality sucked big time. And from the looks of it the processor matters quite a bit for a low bandwidth connection like 3G.</p>
<p>The iPhone 3GS has a nice processor, so we may have better luck now, but then the quality of data on the At&amp;T network has only degraded so we may not be so lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard Byrne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerard Byrne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a couple of concerns regarding the proliferation of Skype.

Firstly (and most importantly) CallerID. I simply won&#039;t accept a call where the CallerID is not presented. As a number of friends start to use Skype more and more, the number of calls presenting with a CLI of  is increasing. Not a good thing. This could be remedied by &#039;spoofing&#039; the CallerID by Skype (subject to knowing and validating originator&#039;s number) or assigning a Skype VOIP number to each user which is routed with the call (especially when it finally emerges from VOIP land to POTS world).

Secondly, I would prefer, where a call is initiating on Skype&#039;s network that it would be answered by a Skype client on the iPhone (kinda gets around the above issue). That way I could identify callers by their Skype username and include their details in my contacts/address book. Ability to background Skype.app anyone?

Finally - a unified Contacts Manager is what is really the next step. And I suspect that Apple&#039;s sweetheart deal with the operators is going to potentially blindside them to the impact of this. I love the SMS (Messages) app on the iPhone. But why doesn&#039;t a contact view have a page to review ALL forms of contact in order (irrespective of type). By this I mean a log of Calls (In/Out), SMS/MMS (sent/received), Emails (sent/received), IMs (in the same fashion as SMS). All with a common &#039;contact&#039; API that allows any iPhone app to register a Contact Record and link to a contact. For that matter why can&#039;t I link a task to a contact? Or a Note? Or even a set of photos?

I&#039;ve been more than tempted to write a Mac OS app which scans the (simple) sqlite db&#039;s in the iPhone backup bundles and appends call logs, sms logs and email snippets to the bottom of the contact&#039;s notes fields.

Why can&#039;t I bring up a contact and see when I last phoned/emailed them? Or them me..

Enough of that. I love my iPhone. But it could be so much more.

Gerard Byrne]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple of concerns regarding the proliferation of Skype.</p>
<p>Firstly (and most importantly) CallerID. I simply won&#8217;t accept a call where the CallerID is not presented. As a number of friends start to use Skype more and more, the number of calls presenting with a CLI of  is increasing. Not a good thing. This could be remedied by &#8216;spoofing&#8217; the CallerID by Skype (subject to knowing and validating originator&#8217;s number) or assigning a Skype VOIP number to each user which is routed with the call (especially when it finally emerges from VOIP land to POTS world).</p>
<p>Secondly, I would prefer, where a call is initiating on Skype&#8217;s network that it would be answered by a Skype client on the iPhone (kinda gets around the above issue). That way I could identify callers by their Skype username and include their details in my contacts/address book. Ability to background Skype.app anyone?</p>
<p>Finally &#8211; a unified Contacts Manager is what is really the next step. And I suspect that Apple&#8217;s sweetheart deal with the operators is going to potentially blindside them to the impact of this. I love the SMS (Messages) app on the iPhone. But why doesn&#8217;t a contact view have a page to review ALL forms of contact in order (irrespective of type). By this I mean a log of Calls (In/Out), SMS/MMS (sent/received), Emails (sent/received), IMs (in the same fashion as SMS). All with a common &#8216;contact&#8217; API that allows any iPhone app to register a Contact Record and link to a contact. For that matter why can&#8217;t I link a task to a contact? Or a Note? Or even a set of photos?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been more than tempted to write a Mac OS app which scans the (simple) sqlite db&#8217;s in the iPhone backup bundles and appends call logs, sms logs and email snippets to the bottom of the contact&#8217;s notes fields.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t I bring up a contact and see when I last phoned/emailed them? Or them me..</p>
<p>Enough of that. I love my iPhone. But it could be so much more.</p>
<p>Gerard Byrne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, from my point of view, AT&amp;T just accepted the reality that &quot;voice&quot; is just another app...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from my point of view, AT&amp;T just accepted the reality that &#8220;voice&#8221; is just another app&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype interview in sauna: AT&#38;T to open up 3G network for Voip calls</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype interview in sauna: AT&#38;T to open up 3G network for Voip calls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more info on the AT&amp;T news, check the article at GigaOM.     Tags: 3G network, AT&amp;T, iphone, skype&#160;      Patrick de Laive Internet entrepreneur   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more info on the AT&amp;T news, check the article at GigaOM.     Tags: 3G network, AT&amp;T, iphone, skype&nbsp;      Patrick de Laive Internet entrepreneur   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiderstar09</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spiderstar09]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/att-to-allow-voip-calls-on-3g/#comment-226011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great!!!! Congrates for all the iPhone consumers.I think it would be better to use the VoIP telephony facility using apple&#039;s iPhone. Now it would be tought to compete for the PSTN VoIP providers with this.
Thanks to AT &amp; T.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!!!! Congrates for all the iPhone consumers.I think it would be better to use the VoIP telephony facility using apple&#8217;s iPhone. Now it would be tought to compete for the PSTN VoIP providers with this.<br />
Thanks to AT &amp; T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

