<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Networking Gear the Last Stand Against Commoditization in the Data Center?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Comes After the Storage M&#38;A Gold Rush : Cloud &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-559423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What Comes After the Storage M&#38;A Gold Rush : Cloud &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-559423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rely on a complex array of networking gear to manage the traffic flow. This equipment may be the last stand against commoditization in the data center, and companies such as Arista, Nicira, and Embrane are pushing both the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rely on a complex array of networking gear to manage the traffic flow. This equipment may be the last stand against commoditization in the data center, and companies such as Arista, Nicira, and Embrane are pushing both the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell Plays the Networking Field With Juniper Deal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-225892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dell Plays the Networking Field With Juniper Deal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-225892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to resell gear from Juniper Networks as the Round Rock, Texas, computer maker attempts to fill the networking hole in its product line. It signed a similar agreement with Brocade in August in the face of an onslaught of competition [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to resell gear from Juniper Networks as the Round Rock, Texas, computer maker attempts to fill the networking hole in its product line. It signed a similar agreement with Brocade in August in the face of an onslaught of competition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Es la red el siguiente nivel para la commodization del Enterprise datacenter &#124; El Blog de Javier Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-225891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Es la red el siguiente nivel para la commodization del Enterprise datacenter &#124; El Blog de Javier Rodriguez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-225891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post esta inspirado en &#8220;Is Networking Gear the Last Stand Against Commoditization in the Data Center?&#8221;, de [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post esta inspirado en &#8220;Is Networking Gear the Last Stand Against Commoditization in the Data Center?&#8221;, de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egrep-cloud-cambrian-watch-2009-10-06 &#171; すでにそこにある雲</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-225890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[egrep-cloud-cambrian-watch-2009-10-06 &#171; すでにそこにある雲]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-225890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is Networking Gear the Last Stand Against Commoditization in the Data Center? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Networking Gear the Last Stand Against Commoditization in the Data Center? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Weiner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-225889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Weiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-225889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post.  This commoditized computing trend is clearly starting to happen in the enterprise, at long last.

But the network will actually have to get *smarter*, not more commoditized, to support these next-gen architectures.  Especially for public cloud usage, lots of policies, tagging, services, etc. will have to be maintained/mapped between different computing locations.  Quite the opposite of the &quot;fat, dumb pipes&quot; of 10-15 years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.  This commoditized computing trend is clearly starting to happen in the enterprise, at long last.</p>
<p>But the network will actually have to get *smarter*, not more commoditized, to support these next-gen architectures.  Especially for public cloud usage, lots of policies, tagging, services, etc. will have to be maintained/mapped between different computing locations.  Quite the opposite of the &#8220;fat, dumb pipes&#8221; of 10-15 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Weiner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-225888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Weiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-225888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jared -- interesting point.  What &quot;services&quot; or advanced features on the network would you cut out to achieve lower network infrastructure cost?  While still getting the biggest pipes available?

Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared &#8212; interesting point.  What &#8220;services&#8221; or advanced features on the network would you cut out to achieve lower network infrastructure cost?  While still getting the biggest pipes available?</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Robins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-225887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Robins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-225887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the end the network speed will be the defining factor. Servers get cheaper and faster, but moving huge  block of data remains the challenge!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end the network speed will be the defining factor. Servers get cheaper and faster, but moving huge  block of data remains the challenge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/05/is-networking-gear-the-last-stand-against-commoditization-in-the-data-center/#comment-225886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=72947#comment-225886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Hamilton from Amazon Web Services blogged on a very similar topic yesterday, along with a research paper on how to get away from name-brand networking gear:

http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2009/10/05/VL2AScalableAndFlexibleDataCenterNetwork.aspx

From his post:

&quot;The reason why most data centers run highly over-subscribed networks is the expense of high-scale networking gear...  Essentially they are networking equivalent of scale-up servers. And, just as with servers, scaling up networking gear drives costs exponentially.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Hamilton from Amazon Web Services blogged on a very similar topic yesterday, along with a research paper on how to get away from name-brand networking gear:</p>
<p><a href="http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2009/10/05/VL2AScalableAndFlexibleDataCenterNetwork.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2009/10/05/VL2AScalableAndFlexibleDataCenterNetwork.aspx</a></p>
<p>From his post:</p>
<p>&#8220;The reason why most data centers run highly over-subscribed networks is the expense of high-scale networking gear&#8230;  Essentially they are networking equivalent of scale-up servers. And, just as with servers, scaling up networking gear drives costs exponentially.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

