<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Cash-rich Chip Cos. Go Shopping?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sajal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/#comment-225736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sajal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=72637#comment-225736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Om and Stacey, Qualcomm has ~17.7 billion in cash. Here&#039;s the 10k:
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=6871903-802-544341&amp;type=sect&amp;dcn=0000950123-09-057827&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reason online sites report a lower number is because a chunk of it is outside US. I just think Qualcomm&#039;s cash hoard is under appreciated vis a vis Apple/Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om and Stacey, Qualcomm has ~17.7 billion in cash. Here&#8217;s the 10k:<br />
<a href="http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=6871903-802-544341&#038;type=sect&#038;dcn=0000950123-09-057827" rel="nofollow">http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=6871903-802-544341&#038;type=sect&#038;dcn=0000950123-09-057827</a></p>
<p>The reason online sites report a lower number is because a chunk of it is outside US. I just think Qualcomm&#8217;s cash hoard is under appreciated vis a vis Apple/Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash Rich Semiconductor Cos. Ready to Spend &#171; Spencer Trask &#38; Company</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/#comment-225735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash Rich Semiconductor Cos. Ready to Spend &#171; Spencer Trask &#38; Company]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=72637#comment-225735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a related post, Om Malik &amp; Stacey Higginbotham speculated that Intel is likely to focus more on acquisition [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a related post, Om Malik &amp; Stacey Higginbotham speculated that Intel is likely to focus more on acquisition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vol</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/#comment-225734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=72637#comment-225734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om,

I have not had a chance to study this but maybe your group can whip up this data fast.
My suspicion is that the recent M&amp;A spurt is due to the companies taking advantage of the new equity/excess liquidity bubble.

There are a few data points that can shed light.
1) Of all the recent M&amp;A&#039;s most of which are post-March/April (when the fed started QE, aka printing money), how much of each deal involves payment in cash vs. payment in equity?
2) Data from #1 can be misleading when a company issues new equity or sells bonds and subsequently makes an acquisition with an all-cash deal.

I was hoping you can tie all those data points together.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>
<p>I have not had a chance to study this but maybe your group can whip up this data fast.<br />
My suspicion is that the recent M&amp;A spurt is due to the companies taking advantage of the new equity/excess liquidity bubble.</p>
<p>There are a few data points that can shed light.<br />
1) Of all the recent M&amp;A&#8217;s most of which are post-March/April (when the fed started QE, aka printing money), how much of each deal involves payment in cash vs. payment in equity?<br />
2) Data from #1 can be misleading when a company issues new equity or sells bonds and subsequently makes an acquisition with an all-cash deal.</p>
<p>I was hoping you can tie all those data points together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Friday, 02-Oct-09 17:59:00 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/#comment-225733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Friday, 02-Oct-09 17:59:00 UTC - Identi.ca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=72637#comment-225733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/        a few seconds ago  from api [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2009/10/02/will-cash-rich-chip-cos-go-shopping/</a>        a few seconds ago  from api [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
