<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What to Expect From the New Net Neutrality Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Common Sense Approach to Net Neutrality &#171; THE CABLE PIPELINE</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Common Sense Approach to Net Neutrality &#171; THE CABLE PIPELINE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] What to Expect From the New Net Neutrality Rules (gigaom.com) [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What to Expect From the New Net Neutrality Rules (gigaom.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadband Isn&#8217;t Just the Web &#8212; It&#8217;s Our Future &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broadband Isn&#8217;t Just the Web &#8212; It&#8217;s Our Future &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] how far do we take access to those services, rather than the access to the pipe itself?  Lawmakers are investigating Google because its Google [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how far do we take access to those services, rather than the access to the pipe itself?  Lawmakers are investigating Google because its Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Attacks Google Voice Again &#8212; This Time With Nuns &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT&#38;T Attacks Google Voice Again &#8212; This Time With Nuns &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] service,&#8221; it would still be under the FCC&#8217;s jurisdiction and subject to any potential net neutrality rules that forbid discriminating against any type of traffic. From AT&amp;T&#8217;s letter: But [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] service,&#8221; it would still be under the FCC&#8217;s jurisdiction and subject to any potential net neutrality rules that forbid discriminating against any type of traffic. From AT&amp;T&#8217;s letter: But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GigaOM Guide to the Net Neutrality Debate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The GigaOM Guide to the Net Neutrality Debate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] P2P files and imagine a startup having to fight through a probe that lasted that long. So as the FCC makes its decisions around network neutrality we need to see clearly defined plans on how to detect and censure violators of network neutrality [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P2P files and imagine a startup having to fight through a probe that lasted that long. So as the FCC makes its decisions around network neutrality we need to see clearly defined plans on how to detect and censure violators of network neutrality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laptops</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laptops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article...Attempting to come with rules to prevent anti competitive behaviour misses the point: this is really only possible because consumers don’t have much choice in broadband providers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article&#8230;Attempting to come with rules to prevent anti competitive behaviour misses the point: this is really only possible because consumers don’t have much choice in broadband providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Glass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Network neutrality&quot; regulation would destroy small, competitive, and rural ISPs, harm consumer choice, raise the price of broadband, and deprive existing users of service. It would be QUITE devastating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Network neutrality&#8221; regulation would destroy small, competitive, and rural ISPs, harm consumer choice, raise the price of broadband, and deprive existing users of service. It would be QUITE devastating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What this really show is that FCC has no &quot;teeth&quot; after all as far as protecting broadband users and consumer from unfair practice.  Basically, Genachowski and the FCC were backing down and running for cover after the ISP lobbyists and the special interest groups hit them with full forces.  For us broadband users with all that voices and concerns? We&#039;re just really ending/going back to square one... maybe 1.5??  The announcement is really just a joke for consumers or net neutrality advocates.  That why the ISP leaders and special interests congratulate the FCC decision.  The FCC announcement at best is still allowing the ISPs all that controls and tools to use against the consumers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this really show is that FCC has no &#8220;teeth&#8221; after all as far as protecting broadband users and consumer from unfair practice.  Basically, Genachowski and the FCC were backing down and running for cover after the ISP lobbyists and the special interest groups hit them with full forces.  For us broadband users with all that voices and concerns? We&#8217;re just really ending/going back to square one&#8230; maybe 1.5??  The announcement is really just a joke for consumers or net neutrality advocates.  That why the ISP leaders and special interests congratulate the FCC decision.  The FCC announcement at best is still allowing the ISPs all that controls and tools to use against the consumers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regulating Network Neutrality is attacking a symptom rather than the disease.  Attempting to come with rules to prevent anti competitive behaviour misses the  point:   this is really only possible because consumers don&#039;t have much choice in broadband providers.  They aught to be looking at how to increase competition.   Of course this is a much more difficult problem to solve so they go for the lower hanging fruit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regulating Network Neutrality is attacking a symptom rather than the disease.  Attempting to come with rules to prevent anti competitive behaviour misses the  point:   this is really only possible because consumers don&#8217;t have much choice in broadband providers.  They aught to be looking at how to increase competition.   Of course this is a much more difficult problem to solve so they go for the lower hanging fruit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Neutrality and CTIA Straw Men</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Net Neutrality and CTIA Straw Men]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What to Expect From the New Net Neutrality Rules (gigaom.com)    Bookmark with: del.icio.us Digg it Furl iFeedReaders ma.gnolia Maple.nu RawSugar reddit Simpy StumbleUpon  Tags:  ctia, FCC, mobile network operators, mobile operators Fnord [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What to Expect From the New Net Neutrality Rules (gigaom.com)    Bookmark with: del.icio.us Digg it Furl iFeedReaders ma.gnolia Maple.nu RawSugar reddit Simpy StumbleUpon  Tags:  ctia, FCC, mobile network operators, mobile operators Fnord [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Fleishman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see any discussion of caps. Genachowski said in his speech that providers, during periods of congestion, would be able to take some kind of action (throttling all uses, one might imagine). But that doesn&#039;t address capping monthly usage, disclosure of said caps, or policies around cancellation when exceeding caps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any discussion of caps. Genachowski said in his speech that providers, during periods of congestion, would be able to take some kind of action (throttling all uses, one might imagine). But that doesn&#8217;t address capping monthly usage, disclosure of said caps, or policies around cancellation when exceeding caps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/21/what-to-expect-from-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-224667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=70497#comment-224667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us not forget Verizon&#039;s &quot;Thou shalt have no other app store before mine!&quot;:

&quot;Verizon Partner Management VP Ryan Hughes said in an interview Friday that non Verizon app stores like BlackBerry App World or Windows Mobile Marketplace won&#039;t be bundled with the smartphones Verizon sells...&quot;

http://gigaom.com/2009/07/13/verizon-to-mobile-developers-can-you-hear-me-now/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not forget Verizon&#8217;s &#8220;Thou shalt have no other app store before mine!&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;Verizon Partner Management VP Ryan Hughes said in an interview Friday that non Verizon app stores like BlackBerry App World or Windows Mobile Marketplace won&#8217;t be bundled with the smartphones Verizon sells&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/13/verizon-to-mobile-developers-can-you-hear-me-now/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2009/07/13/verizon-to-mobile-developers-can-you-hear-me-now/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

