<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Agrees to Buy Omniture for $1.8B in Cash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/#comment-224191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=69843#comment-224191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could not agree more.
It is not only odd, it is really high risk with no guarantee of shareholder value. Wish them to make me wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more.<br />
It is not only odd, it is really high risk with no guarantee of shareholder value. Wish them to make me wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmburman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/#comment-224190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmburman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=69843#comment-224190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow...seem to have quite a bit of cash don&#039;t they]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;seem to have quite a bit of cash don&#8217;t they</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hawkinson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/#comment-224189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Hawkinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=69843#comment-224189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a big move by Adobe.  It sends a good signal to their customers, but they are going to need to keep innovating and the integration complexities are going to make that tough.  At some level, this may end up creating even more room for innovation by startups in the space.  A few more thoughts on it here - http://bit.ly/5q2jG.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a big move by Adobe.  It sends a good signal to their customers, but they are going to need to keep innovating and the integration complexities are going to make that tough.  At some level, this may end up creating even more room for innovation by startups in the space.  A few more thoughts on it here &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/5q2jG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5q2jG</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tadeu Banzato</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/#comment-224188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tadeu Banzato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=69843#comment-224188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me it does sounds odd, but in the end if you think of advertising and flash for example, seems that they can&#039;t live apart.
So in the end the acquisition makes a lot more sense then we think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it does sounds odd, but in the end if you think of advertising and flash for example, seems that they can&#8217;t live apart.<br />
So in the end the acquisition makes a lot more sense then we think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shankar Saikia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/#comment-224187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shankar Saikia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=69843#comment-224187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ADOBE + OMNITURE = ODD COUPLE

Some couples, despite the appearance of being odd, actually have good relationships. However, successful odd couples are rare. EBay + Skype was odd, as was Compaq + DEC. When companies merge or get acquired, there need to be important synergies as in the case of all of Oracle&#039;s acquisitions. In the case of Adobe and Omniture the combo seems to lack the essential synergies. One is a hard core technology company, a software development powerhouse, that has done a great job of fighting off Microsoft in the area of desktop and digital publishing. The other is an advertising analytics company that provides a service. Adobe and Omniture are an odd couple - the investment bankers that brought these two together did a great sales job to the respective management committees and boards. This odd couple will find it difficult to survive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADOBE + OMNITURE = ODD COUPLE</p>
<p>Some couples, despite the appearance of being odd, actually have good relationships. However, successful odd couples are rare. EBay + Skype was odd, as was Compaq + DEC. When companies merge or get acquired, there need to be important synergies as in the case of all of Oracle&#8217;s acquisitions. In the case of Adobe and Omniture the combo seems to lack the essential synergies. One is a hard core technology company, a software development powerhouse, that has done a great job of fighting off Microsoft in the area of desktop and digital publishing. The other is an advertising analytics company that provides a service. Adobe and Omniture are an odd couple &#8211; the investment bankers that brought these two together did a great sales job to the respective management committees and boards. This odd couple will find it difficult to survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adobe kauft Analytics-Anbieter Omniture &#187; Daily Data</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/#comment-224186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adobe kauft Analytics-Anbieter Omniture &#187; Daily Data]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=69843#comment-224186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Link: Adobe Agrees to Buy Omniture for $1.8B in Cash  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: Adobe Agrees to Buy Omniture for $1.8B in Cash  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As the Economy Turns, Tech M&#38;A Is Back &#8212; and That&#8217;s Good News for Start-Ups</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/15/adobe-agrees-to-buy-omniture-for-1-8b-in-cash/#comment-224185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[As the Economy Turns, Tech M&#38;A Is Back &#8212; and That&#8217;s Good News for Start-Ups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=69843#comment-224185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Adobe buying Omniture for $1.8 billion. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adobe buying Omniture for $1.8 billion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

