<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compact Flash Camera Cards Get Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/09/14/compact-flash-camera-cards-sandisk-extreme-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/14/compact-flash-camera-cards-sandisk-extreme-pro/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:43:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeu en ligne gratuit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/14/compact-flash-camera-cards-sandisk-extreme-pro/#comment-425245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeu en ligne gratuit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=43745#comment-425245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have used many cards with my D200; mostly the 2GB Extreme III version of this card. These are my first Extreme IV series cards in 4GB. My expectations for this card ran something like, same performance as my 2GB cards, maybe a little faster on computer downloads. I was not disapointed.

One interesting little bonus has shown up with these cards and my D200. While shooting on a long trip across Glacier National Park I averaged 700 shots per battery when using these cards. While using the older and slower cards I averaged 400 shots per card. I have shot thousands and thousands of pictures with my 2GB cards and I average between 400 and 500 per battery charge consistantly. This is the first time I have seen 700+ from a single charge on my D200. More shoots are required to establish the actual performance difference but so far there has been a noticable reduction in battery use with this card and the D200.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used many cards with my D200; mostly the 2GB Extreme III version of this card. These are my first Extreme IV series cards in 4GB. My expectations for this card ran something like, same performance as my 2GB cards, maybe a little faster on computer downloads. I was not disapointed.</p>
<p>One interesting little bonus has shown up with these cards and my D200. While shooting on a long trip across Glacier National Park I averaged 700 shots per battery when using these cards. While using the older and slower cards I averaged 400 shots per card. I have shot thousands and thousands of pictures with my 2GB cards and I average between 400 and 500 per battery charge consistantly. This is the first time I have seen 700+ from a single charge on my D200. More shoots are required to establish the actual performance difference but so far there has been a noticable reduction in battery use with this card and the D200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
