<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aspera Bypasses Bandwidth Bottlenecks to EC2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Consumer Content Up Next for Aspera?: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/#comment-586471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Consumer Content Up Next for Aspera?: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=68928#comment-586471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] proprietary high-speed file-transport technology, fasp, before, including its products for both Amazon Web Services and the iPhone, but with more and more huge files and data sets making their way across the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] proprietary high-speed file-transport technology, fasp, before, including its products for both Amazon Web Services and the iPhone, but with more and more huge files and data sets making their way across the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aspera&#8217;s iPhone App Sends Fat Files With Ease &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/#comment-223785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aspera&#8217;s iPhone App Sends Fat Files With Ease &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=68928#comment-223785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] I&#8217;ve long been a fan of Aspera, which has a proprietary method for moving bits around, and &#8212; unlike popular protocols &#8212; takes full advantage of an existing broadband pipe for the file&#8217;s entire journey. It is currently used by media companies for transporting huge video files from New York to Los Angeles and even for sending data to the cloud. Its move to the iPhone was something CEO and Co-founder Michele Munson talked about with me last September. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve long been a fan of Aspera, which has a proprietary method for moving bits around, and &#8212; unlike popular protocols &#8212; takes full advantage of an existing broadband pipe for the file&#8217;s entire journey. It is currently used by media companies for transporting huge video files from New York to Los Angeles and even for sending data to the cloud. Its move to the iPhone was something CEO and Co-founder Michele Munson talked about with me last September. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/#comment-223784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=68928#comment-223784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are working to bring it to the iPhone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are working to bring it to the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/#comment-223783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=68928#comment-223783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can they send a 10gb ZIP file on a 0 packet lose network with the same speed.

Most of these products do well if you have high packet lose and / or high network latency.

Jay]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can they send a 10gb ZIP file on a 0 packet lose network with the same speed.</p>
<p>Most of these products do well if you have high packet lose and / or high network latency.</p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Syawalfiza</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/#comment-223782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhammad Syawalfiza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=68928#comment-223782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aspera technology proven for bulk data transfer. suggestion to the company: license the technology to mobile phone company .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aspera technology proven for bulk data transfer. suggestion to the company: license the technology to mobile phone company .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vipin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/aspera-bypasses-bandwidth-bottlenecks-to-ec2/#comment-223781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vipin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=68928#comment-223781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10 Gigabytes in 3 minutes = 57 MBytes/Sec = 455 Mbps. Are service provider providing 455 Mbps uplink dedicated connection or I am missing something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 Gigabytes in 3 minutes = 57 MBytes/Sec = 455 Mbps. Are service provider providing 455 Mbps uplink dedicated connection or I am missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

