13 Comments

Summary:

Facebook Mobile users are twice as active on the social network than web-only users and account for about a quarter of its entire user base. As a result, carriers have been asking Facebook to trim down the amount of data contained in its mobile web versions. […]

facebook-logo Facebook Mobile users are twice as active on the social network than web-only users and account for about a quarter of its entire user base. As a result, carriers have been asking Facebook to trim down the amount of data contained in its mobile web versions. Carriers “want the same service,” said Henri Moissinac, director of the company’s mobile unit, “but with less data.”

Their reasons are twofold: money and speed. The spike in data traffic that’s resulted from the proliferation of smartphones has affected both carriers’ gross margins on data plans and the customer experience. Carriers, of course, are tasked with the challenge of figuring out “how to encourage usage and keep margins for mobile broadband high without overloading their networks or driving users back to the bad old days when everyone was too afraid to open the web browser on their phone for fear of exorbitant data fees” as Stacey notes in a GigaOM Pro report released today (subscription required). It’s imperative that data plan customers are happy with how quickly they can, say, thumb through pictures and news feeds, and upload a comment to a friends’ status update. If not, they could take their business — and money — elsewhere.

To that end, Moissinac said that, for example, all photos on Facebook Mobile are low-resolution. And when dealing with carriers based in emerging countries with 2G networks, Facebook can make photos smaller or bury them within the app altogether so they’re not displayed when a user first logs on. But going forward, it will likely have to offer additional concessions, since for Facebook, which just released its first official mobile application for Android devices yesterday and is currently developing an app for Palm’s WebOS, accommodating carriers’ concerns will continue to be necessary in order for it to successfully expand across the mobile realm.

  1. Websites have always been optimized for the common access rates available, and the smart webmasters kept the size of their pages small (witness Google’s home page). Generally, there is lots of room to “trim the fat”, and Facebook must accommodate what their users mobile devices can deliver.

    Share
  2. Facebook needs to discontinue auto-loading their “what are you doing” twitter-like feed. If you get a message or alert on facebook it always takes some time for the feed to load up before you can go to the new alert/announcement. If they simply made a button so people can navigate to see the feed, it would be much better.

    Share
    1. I concur with you Dirk, it’s a little bit annoying to wait for the status updates when you just want to go and see some friend details or an alert… I think there should be an option to activate or deactivate this initial loading.

      Share
  3. [...] Original Post By Google News Click Here For The Entire Article [...]

    Share
  4. [...] Original Post By Google News Click Here For The Entire Article [...]

    Share
  5. [...] Visit link: Carriers to Facebook Mobile: Get on a Data Diet [...]

    Share
  6. [...] via Carriers to Facebook Mobile: Get on a Data Diet . [...]

    Share
  7. [...] Carriers to Facebook Mobile: Get on a Data Diet | Carriers have the wrong perspective then… if… This article makes no sense. If apps are bloated and don't work well then users won't use them. Yet as a user I want the best experience possible and that means a full service experience in my pocket. If Facebook is really breaking carriers then they better learn to fix it for it is only going to get worse and Users won't buy this POV. (tags: facebook mobile social operators) [...]

    Share
  8. Carriers claim to deliver the same internet experience as your home PC, but as soon as the content providers provide the same content the carriers get upset. They carriers need to get over it. If they are going to provide 3G/4G speeds then they have to expect users to use all of it. The fact is that phones today can do everything your home computer can do on the internet. To think that their customer’s wont use that functionality to the fullest extent is just dumb. The carriers just need to spend some of their billions of dollars of profit to stay on top of their infrastructure.

    Share
  9. I should say mobile clients are way more better than those for facebook.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post