<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Is the Tech IPO Pipeline So Dry?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/08/29/why-is-the-tech-ipo-pipeline-so-dry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/08/29/why-is-the-tech-ipo-pipeline-so-dry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Klein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/08/29/why-is-the-tech-ipo-pipeline-so-dry/#comment-222737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Klein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=66696#comment-222737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of the reason IPOs are down in general is the unrealistic requirements of Sarbanes Oxley.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason IPOs are down in general is the unrealistic requirements of Sarbanes Oxley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seed is the new Series A for VCs &#124; Innovation Toronto</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/08/29/why-is-the-tech-ipo-pipeline-so-dry/#comment-222736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seed is the new Series A for VCs &#124; Innovation Toronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=66696#comment-222736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Is the Tech IPO Pipeline So Dry? (gigaom.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Is the Tech IPO Pipeline So Dry? (gigaom.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gardiner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/08/29/why-is-the-tech-ipo-pipeline-so-dry/#comment-222735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Gardiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=66696#comment-222735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech IPO&#039;s are down because of the un-realistic nature of VC&#039;s in the US.  Its all about getting purchased, not making a profitable company.
Anyone with a resonably good idea to make a profitable company is squashed by this mentality.

As such, the environment the VC&#039;s in the US have built over the last 5-10 years is un-realistic of any IPO activity.

From my perspective, if I had a great idea, put some time into it here in Australia, (The best place to live in the world ;) a US company would likely see it..  Spin it as their idea to a VC, raise 20million dollars.  With this backing kill of original company of as they are likely trying to actually build the idea on the old principle of &quot;Making a profit&quot; Not..  Burn through 20mill and try to get purchased before you hit the wall.

I personally cannot wait for this environment to implode, as it is likely to do eventually.   hope so in any case.

James]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech IPO&#8217;s are down because of the un-realistic nature of VC&#8217;s in the US.  Its all about getting purchased, not making a profitable company.<br />
Anyone with a resonably good idea to make a profitable company is squashed by this mentality.</p>
<p>As such, the environment the VC&#8217;s in the US have built over the last 5-10 years is un-realistic of any IPO activity.</p>
<p>From my perspective, if I had a great idea, put some time into it here in Australia, (The best place to live in the world ;) a US company would likely see it..  Spin it as their idea to a VC, raise 20million dollars.  With this backing kill of original company of as they are likely trying to actually build the idea on the old principle of &#8220;Making a profit&#8221; Not..  Burn through 20mill and try to get purchased before you hit the wall.</p>
<p>I personally cannot wait for this environment to implode, as it is likely to do eventually.   hope so in any case.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Reese</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/08/29/why-is-the-tech-ipo-pipeline-so-dry/#comment-222734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Reese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=66696#comment-222734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who needs an IPO when an entrepreneur can sell to Cisco and join several of Cisco&#039;s 59 internal standing committees with 750 senior employees participating.

Talk about entrepreneur heaven, Cisco is it, who in the heck needs an IPO when selling to Cisco would be so much fun for an entrepreneur!

$35 billion in cash and counting, come and get it entrepreneurs, Cisco&#039;s committees need your participation and entrepreneurial talent!

Sincerely,

Brad Reese on Cisco
http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/1936/
Network World Cisco Subnet: The Independent Voice of Cisco Customers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs an IPO when an entrepreneur can sell to Cisco and join several of Cisco&#8217;s 59 internal standing committees with 750 senior employees participating.</p>
<p>Talk about entrepreneur heaven, Cisco is it, who in the heck needs an IPO when selling to Cisco would be so much fun for an entrepreneur!</p>
<p>$35 billion in cash and counting, come and get it entrepreneurs, Cisco&#8217;s committees need your participation and entrepreneurial talent!</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Brad Reese on Cisco<br />
<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/1936/" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/1936/</a><br />
Network World Cisco Subnet: The Independent Voice of Cisco Customers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday links: the new frugality Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/08/29/why-is-the-tech-ipo-pipeline-so-dry/#comment-222733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunday links: the new frugality Abnormal Returns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=66696#comment-222733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why is the tech IPO pipeline so dry?  (GigaOM) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why is the tech IPO pipeline so dry?  (GigaOM) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

