<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Is to Blame for the Google Voice Apps Fiasco?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google and Apple Debate the Meaning of “Rejected”</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google and Apple Debate the Meaning of “Rejected”]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and moves contacts to Google&#8217;s servers. But is that what&#8217;s really bothering Apple? Om Malik offered another opinion way back when people were blaming AT&amp;T for the not-rejection of Google [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and moves contacts to Google&#8217;s servers. But is that what&#8217;s really bothering Apple? Om Malik offered another opinion way back when people were blaming AT&amp;T for the not-rejection of Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google and Apple Debate the Meaning of &#8220;Rejected&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google and Apple Debate the Meaning of &#8220;Rejected&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and moves contacts to Google&#8217;s servers. But is that what&#8217;s really bothering Apple? Om Malik offered another opinion way back when people were blaming AT&amp;T for the not-rejection of Google [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and moves contacts to Google&#8217;s servers. But is that what&#8217;s really bothering Apple? Om Malik offered another opinion way back when people were blaming AT&amp;T for the not-rejection of Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: App Stores, Mobile Data &#38; the Dumb Pipe Threat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[App Stores, Mobile Data &#38; the Dumb Pipe Threat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] It still seems like some network operators are having a hard time accepting that, though. How far have they come in changing their thinking regarding non-cellular [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It still seems like some network operators are having a hard time accepting that, though. How far have they come in changing their thinking regarding non-cellular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Pulled Google Voice App, Not AT&#38;T</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Pulled Google Voice App, Not AT&#38;T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] app from the App Store, and now it&#8217;s been proven right. Om actually believed AT&amp;T, and argued that the removal was because of a brewing rivalry between Google and Apple. As for the rest of the letters, we&#8217;ve included links to PDF copies below for those of you [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] app from the App Store, and now it&#8217;s been proven right. Om actually believed AT&amp;T, and argued that the removal was because of a brewing rivalry between Google and Apple. As for the rest of the letters, we&#8217;ve included links to PDF copies below for those of you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob B</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a techno retard but once I found out how easy it is to jailbreak and iPhone and get the GV app, I did it.  All Apple and AT&amp;T have accomplished is to encourage thousands if not millions of those who had never even considered it to jailbreak their iPhone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a techno retard but once I found out how easy it is to jailbreak and iPhone and get the GV app, I did it.  All Apple and AT&amp;T have accomplished is to encourage thousands if not millions of those who had never even considered it to jailbreak their iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GigaOM Interview: FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski on Mobile, Broadband, iPhone &#38; Innovation &#124; www.wi-fi-zones.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The GigaOM Interview: FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski on Mobile, Broadband, iPhone &#38; Innovation &#124; www.wi-fi-zones.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] last week, a day before the Federal Communications Commission started to investigate the Google Voice App fiasco, I spoke with the new FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski. He managed to carve out a few minutes from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week, a day before the Federal Communications Commission started to investigate the Google Voice App fiasco, I spoke with the new FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski. He managed to carve out a few minutes from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GigaOM Interview: FCC Chair Julius Genachowski</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The GigaOM Interview: FCC Chair Julius Genachowski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]    Late last week, a day before the Federal Communications Commission started to investigate the Google Voice App fiasco, I spoke with the new FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski. He managed to carve out a few minutes from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    Late last week, a day before the Federal Communications Commission started to investigate the Google Voice App fiasco, I spoke with the new FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski. He managed to carve out a few minutes from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Google Apps Fiasco: Now That FCC is Involved, Maybe Truth Will Come Out</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Google Apps Fiasco: Now That FCC is Involved, Maybe Truth Will Come Out]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] most folks folks have blamed AT&amp;T, I have maintained that this is a battle between Google and Apple. AT&amp;T is just the punching bag. I feared that unless they came clean, they were only going to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most folks folks have blamed AT&amp;T, I have maintained that this is a battle between Google and Apple. AT&amp;T is just the punching bag. I feared that unless they came clean, they were only going to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko Roettgers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait, the rev share deal was nixed last month? Uhm, nevermind. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, the rev share deal was nixed last month? Uhm, nevermind. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko Roettgers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/29/who-is-to-blame-for-the-google-voice-apps-fiasco/#comment-219302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61464#comment-219302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om, it&#039;s funny that Arrington used your Google voice as a phone company argument against you, but this goes both ways. Apple &#039;s rev share iPhone deal with AT&amp;T is a cash cow for Cupertino, and it&#039;s based on the idea of having the iPhone exclusively on one carrier. Now imagine how that deal looks to AT&amp;T if Google suddenly emerges as a second, stealth phone company on the same device ...

Having the ability to block competition on its own device gives Apple much more leverage in future negotiations with phone companies. It&#039;s not even about GV or what impact it may or may not have on SMS or voice revenues. It&#039;s about the fact that Apple can always point to this and say: Sing up with us, give us a part of the data revenue, and you&#039;re gonna have a true exclusive on this device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, it&#8217;s funny that Arrington used your Google voice as a phone company argument against you, but this goes both ways. Apple &#8216;s rev share iPhone deal with AT&amp;T is a cash cow for Cupertino, and it&#8217;s based on the idea of having the iPhone exclusively on one carrier. Now imagine how that deal looks to AT&amp;T if Google suddenly emerges as a second, stealth phone company on the same device &#8230;</p>
<p>Having the ability to block competition on its own device gives Apple much more leverage in future negotiations with phone companies. It&#8217;s not even about GV or what impact it may or may not have on SMS or voice revenues. It&#8217;s about the fact that Apple can always point to this and say: Sing up with us, give us a part of the data revenue, and you&#8217;re gonna have a true exclusive on this device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
