<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fact &amp; Fiction of Google Voice&#039;s iPhone Rejection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Want Google Voice on Your iPhone: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-286513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why You Want Google Voice on Your iPhone: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-286513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]    After over a year in limbo, Apple has reportedly approved Google&#8217;s Voice application for the iTunes App Store, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    After over a year in limbo, Apple has reportedly approved Google&#8217;s Voice application for the iTunes App Store, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There’s (Not) An App for That: 10 Apps Only Available for Jailbroken iPhones &#124; The Apple Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[There’s (Not) An App for That: 10 Apps Only Available for Jailbroken iPhones &#124; The Apple Tech Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] does a wayward app go after being rejected by the Apple? Sometimes it valiantly tries to meet Apple&#8217;s approval, constantly guessing Apple&#8217;s whim and fancy. Other times, a developer doesn&#8217;t even try. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] does a wayward app go after being rejected by the Apple? Sometimes it valiantly tries to meet Apple&#8217;s approval, constantly guessing Apple&#8217;s whim and fancy. Other times, a developer doesn&#8217;t even try. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There&#8217;s (Not) An App for That: 10 Apps Only Available for Jailbroken iPhones</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[There&#8217;s (Not) An App for That: 10 Apps Only Available for Jailbroken iPhones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Where does a wayward app go after being rejected by the Apple? Sometimes it valiantly tries to meet Apple&#8217;s approval, constantly guessing Apple&#8217;s whim and fancy. Other times, a developer doesn&#8217;t even try. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where does a wayward app go after being rejected by the Apple? Sometimes it valiantly tries to meet Apple&#8217;s approval, constantly guessing Apple&#8217;s whim and fancy. Other times, a developer doesn&#8217;t even try. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Approves Another VoIP App, Rebtel &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Approves Another VoIP App, Rebtel &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Vonage. Given that Apple and AT&amp;T are giving the nod to almost all VoIP applications, I wonder why exactly Google Voice isn&#8217;t getting the go-ahead? Any theories, people? (Press release from Rebtel below the fold.)  It took nine months but [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vonage. Given that Apple and AT&amp;T are giving the nod to almost all VoIP applications, I wonder why exactly Google Voice isn&#8217;t getting the go-ahead? Any theories, people? (Press release from Rebtel below the fold.)  It took nine months but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Eyes Apple’s Blockage of Google Voice &#124; Broadband Breakfast</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FCC Eyes Apple’s Blockage of Google Voice &#124; Broadband Breakfast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to a report by Om Malik on Gigaom, this allegation that AT&amp;T is behind Apple’s blocking of Google Voice is “flat-out [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a report by Om Malik on Gigaom, this allegation that AT&amp;T is behind Apple’s blocking of Google Voice is “flat-out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Blogging &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple, AT&#38;T say no to Google Voice iPhone App</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technology Blogging &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple, AT&#38;T say no to Google Voice iPhone App]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] getting into the operator network. Some say  it was the handy work of AT&amp;T  and other folks  argue why would AT&amp;T do that . It’s interesting to read different opinions and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] getting into the operator network. Some say  it was the handy work of AT&amp;T  and other folks  argue why would AT&amp;T do that . It’s interesting to read different opinions and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Links Up With Verizon to Fight Apple</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Links Up With Verizon to Fight Apple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as game-changing to the wireless world in terms of a form factor and experience. And if it helps Google gain mobile device market share at the expense of Apple, that&#8217;s probably worth teaming up with one of its carrier [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as game-changing to the wireless world in terms of a form factor and experience. And if it helps Google gain mobile device market share at the expense of Apple, that&#8217;s probably worth teaming up with one of its carrier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Has Some Important Lessons to Learn » Apple, iPhone, Microsoft, Microsofts, Jobs, Apples » Mac OS X Fans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Has Some Important Lessons to Learn » Apple, iPhone, Microsoft, Microsofts, Jobs, Apples » Mac OS X Fans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] hope Google Voicegate teaches Apple a sobering, but not too damaging, lesson about the importance of transparency and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hope Google Voicegate teaches Apple a sobering, but not too damaging, lesson about the importance of transparency and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone toglie la voce a Google di Claudio Tamburrino giovedì 30 luglio 2009 Roma &#8211; Apple ha ufficialmente bloccato Google Voice su App Store, con la motivazione che &#8220;duplica le funzioni già integrate nell&#8217;iPhone&#8221;. Dopo aver tolto</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhone toglie la voce a Google di Claudio Tamburrino giovedì 30 luglio 2009 Roma &#8211; Apple ha ufficialmente bloccato Google Voice su App Store, con la motivazione che &#8220;duplica le funzioni già integrate nell&#8217;iPhone&#8221;. Dopo aver tolto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] intanto, è già disponibile da due settimane per Android e Blackberry (curiosamente anche questo distribuito con [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] intanto, è già disponibile da due settimane per Android e Blackberry (curiosamente anche questo distribuito con [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speaking of tone — Sample the Web</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/28/google-voice-iphone/#comment-219046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Speaking of tone — Sample the Web]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=61075#comment-219046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Om Malik was much more on target than Gruber was, because he used logic instead of a single un-named source. That source has now been either proven unreliable or Gruber has been proven to be negligent in thoroughly questioning that source. Either way, Gruber&#8217;s strong-toned &#8220;But, trust me, it was AT&amp;T&#8217;s decision&#8221; dismissal of Malik&#8217;s spot on analysis of the situation reveals him to be, just like his source, untrustworthy, as well as a blogger, a journalist, and a pundit who must be taken with a grain of salt and compared to multiple other sources. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik was much more on target than Gruber was, because he used logic instead of a single un-named source. That source has now been either proven unreliable or Gruber has been proven to be negligent in thoroughly questioning that source. Either way, Gruber&#8217;s strong-toned &#8220;But, trust me, it was AT&amp;T&#8217;s decision&#8221; dismissal of Malik&#8217;s spot on analysis of the situation reveals him to be, just like his source, untrustworthy, as well as a blogger, a journalist, and a pundit who must be taken with a grain of salt and compared to multiple other sources. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
