<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Fires Juniper-Loaded Salvo at Cisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM Turns Back on Juniper to Buy Blade Networks: Cloud &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-285309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IBM Turns Back on Juniper to Buy Blade Networks: Cloud &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-285309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] October. The deal is also a bit of bad news for Juniper, the networking and switch maker that had a deepening partnership with IBM in the wake of Cisco launching its competitive entry into the server market, thereby alienating its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October. The deal is also a bit of bad news for Juniper, the networking and switch maker that had a deepening partnership with IBM in the wake of Cisco launching its competitive entry into the server market, thereby alienating its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-265970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-265970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is another good one

http://www.ciosolutions.com/articles/90-what-does-juniper-really-bring-to-the-table-that-cisco-does-not-already-provide]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another good one</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ciosolutions.com/articles/90-what-does-juniper-really-bring-to-the-table-that-cisco-does-not-already-provide" rel="nofollow">http://www.ciosolutions.com/articles/90-what-does-juniper-really-bring-to-the-table-that-cisco-does-not-already-provide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Competition Starting to Eat Into Cisco&#8217;s Core Markets? &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Competition Starting to Eat Into Cisco&#8217;s Core Markets? &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] increasingly desperate competitors. The very fact Cisco has made enemies of former partners such as IBM is only going to hurt the company.    : Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Juniper [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increasingly desperate competitors. The very fact Cisco has made enemies of former partners such as IBM is only going to hurt the company.    : Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Juniper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP and Microsoft Buddy Up for Cloud Computing &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HP and Microsoft Buddy Up for Cloud Computing &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the next generation computing model, hardware, software and networking companies are buddying up to create a data center that  runs like a [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the next generation computing model, hardware, software and networking companies are buddying up to create a data center that  runs like a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell Teams Up With Brocade to Tackle Cisco&#8217;s Vision for Computing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dell Teams Up With Brocade to Tackle Cisco&#8217;s Vision for Computing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] boxes and take a cut of the sales of Brocades switches. It&#8217;s a deal similar to the one IBM signed earlier this summer with Juniper, another network gear maker. IBM also has a deal to resell and brand Brocade switches under its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] boxes and take a cut of the sales of Brocades switches. It&#8217;s a deal similar to the one IBM signed earlier this summer with Juniper, another network gear maker. IBM also has a deal to resell and brand Brocade switches under its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old English Teacher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old English Teacher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stratus, rather than Startus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stratus, rather than Startus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BotchagalupeMarks for July 22nd - 06:18 &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BotchagalupeMarks for July 22nd - 06:18 &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IBM Fires Juniper-Loaded Salvo at Cisco - IBM said today it will resell switches and routers made by Juniper under the IBM brand to compliment Big Blue&#8217;s server products aimed at data centers. The move is a direct response to Cisco&#8217;s creation of its own brand of servers it calls the Unified Computing System, as well as efforts by Hewlett-Packard to bring that company&#8217;s ProCurve networking gear closer to its servers. They&#8217;re all part of a larger attempt to keep pushing the boundaries of virtualization beyond hardware and into the network itself. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IBM Fires Juniper-Loaded Salvo at Cisco &#8211; IBM said today it will resell switches and routers made by Juniper under the IBM brand to compliment Big Blue&rsquo;s server products aimed at data centers. The move is a direct response to Cisco&rsquo;s creation of its own brand of servers it calls the Unified Computing System, as well as efforts by Hewlett-Packard to bring that company&rsquo;s ProCurve networking gear closer to its servers. They&rsquo;re all part of a larger attempt to keep pushing the boundaries of virtualization beyond hardware and into the network itself. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: les madras</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[les madras]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[like Safeway is a meat company?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like Safeway is a meat company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting move by IBM. I personally thought they would buy another switching company rather than private label someone else&#039;s. We recently wrote an article -&gt; http://www.ciosolutions.com/articles/12-juniper-vs-cisco about Juniper and them being a viable threat to cisco in the enterprise switching and routing market. To me IBM understands that Juniper Networks with their portfolio of products combined with their Market Cap equals a company that can chip away at Cisco&#039;s dominance in the enterprise switching and routing space. I don&#039;t know if IBM knows how they will leverage this weapon yet but I am sure time will tell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting move by IBM. I personally thought they would buy another switching company rather than private label someone else&#8217;s. We recently wrote an article -&gt; <a href="http://www.ciosolutions.com/articles/12-juniper-vs-cisco" rel="nofollow">http://www.ciosolutions.com/articles/12-juniper-vs-cisco</a> about Juniper and them being a viable threat to cisco in the enterprise switching and routing market. To me IBM understands that Juniper Networks with their portfolio of products combined with their Market Cap equals a company that can chip away at Cisco&#8217;s dominance in the enterprise switching and routing space. I don&#8217;t know if IBM knows how they will leverage this weapon yet but I am sure time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/ibm-will-resell-juniper-gear-to-take-on-ciscos-servers/#comment-218258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=59919#comment-218258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you call 37% of the $53 billion year server market not enough to be a product company, then you are right. Rest of your points are absolutely right. And that is why Cisco needs to be worried about IBM and its new friendships.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you call 37% of the $53 billion year server market not enough to be a product company, then you are right. Rest of your points are absolutely right. And that is why Cisco needs to be worried about IBM and its new friendships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
