Summary:

CondeNast, which has hired McKinsey to help rethink its business, is starting early: it is closing down Men.Style.com, its online-only desti…

Conde Nast Style

CondeNast, which has hired McKinsey to help rethink its business, is starting early: it is closing down Men.Style.com, its online-only destination, which served as the online home of GQ and Details magazines since 2005, as part of its plans to focus on existing magazine brands online instead of independent destination sites. Conde Nast Digital president Sarah Chubb told AdAge that it didn’t make sense to have three men’s brands online, what with the cost cutting already in place, and integrated print-web makes a better package for advertisers. GQ.com will become the flagship, Men.Style.com traffic will refer to GQ.com, and the online staff will move to GQ.com. Details will get the traffic already going to Men.Style.com via Details.com.

Are the days numbered for the remaining online-only sites at CN? Style.com may be the next to go, as Glamour has its own website, and Vogue is supposed to gets its own site by next year. Chubb says Style.com is safe for now, but how long? Correction: Glamour was never part of Style.com, the PR points out today. Some more explanation from the PR below.

The existence of these independent online brands –Style.com, Epicurious.com and Concierge.com — within Conde Nast are a direct result of its history with CondeNet, and its famously slow embrace of the web in general over the years. CondeNet was dismantled early this year and in came Conde Nast Digital, with its new strategy of, well, we’ll find out what McKinsey comes up with.

Updated: From Conde Nast Digital PR: “Style.com was launched in 2001 as the online home of Vogue and W. W magazine is no longer part of Style.com as it has its own site (for about 2 years now). And Vogue only represents 10% of traffic to Style.com so when Vogue.com launches Style.com will remain. Similar to what we did with Epicurious.com. Both Bon Appetit and Gourmet now have their own web site and Epicurious.com remains a very strong site. In fact, the site saw no loss of traffic when those brands got their own site.

What we are doing with Men.Style.com is very particular to the category. While in the case of Style.com where only 10% of traffic is from Vogue content, on Men.Style.com 35% of traffic comes from GQ content.”

Comments have been disabled for this post