<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Look Back at a Month of Binging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndreaF</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AndreaF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that anybody saying that there are not issues with the current search engines is either lying or has no clue.
Until a couple of years ago google offered great results, now the web is so crowded that it&#039;s difficult to cut through the rubbish and get to the relevant results.
In my experience, Bing usually provides less results, sometimes misses something, but mostly its results are more relevant as also seem to indicate the stats.
Bing has not solved the issue but made a step in the right direction; it&#039;s not just about finding the results but providing the users with some guidance based on their needs.
it would be interesting to see stats for users who use search many times a day (say, more than 5 times a day); in my view this may be a better indicator of the relative quality of the various engines and what the future holds for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that anybody saying that there are not issues with the current search engines is either lying or has no clue.<br />
Until a couple of years ago google offered great results, now the web is so crowded that it&#8217;s difficult to cut through the rubbish and get to the relevant results.<br />
In my experience, Bing usually provides less results, sometimes misses something, but mostly its results are more relevant as also seem to indicate the stats.<br />
Bing has not solved the issue but made a step in the right direction; it&#8217;s not just about finding the results but providing the users with some guidance based on their needs.<br />
it would be interesting to see stats for users who use search many times a day (say, more than 5 times a day); in my view this may be a better indicator of the relative quality of the various engines and what the future holds for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveballmer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveballmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers mean nothing except what we want them to mean! We have seen growth!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers mean nothing except what we want them to mean! We have seen growth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheese</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One month is not enough time to pronounce bing a winner or a loser. Google didn&#039;t become a winner in 1 month, heck not even 1 year after it launched. Apart from that, search engine loyalties will not change overnight. Nor will ad spends shift base. IMO, the first month of bing has been noteworthy - expecting more than that is naive.

The real fun (or war) only begins now..and will run for the rest of year. Will microsoft keep the steam on both product and market innovation for search, while pursuing dreams in other areas - windows 7, netbooks, azure, silverlight, netflix, twitter....

If Google has been successful in search, it is not merely because of the brainwave that Larry and Serge had a decade ago - it is more due to all the brawn work put in by a huge dedicated team in continuously ensuring that the search results stay relevant. Bing will call for a similar investment of passion. A similar drive to stay relevant and contemporary, to be smart, to be fun.

The biggest question that microsoft will need to answer by the end of the year is: Do we want Bing to make money? Nothing will decide the fate of bing more than the answer to this question.

Note that Google seems to have come to terms with not expecting any money from any of it&#039;s products other than search. All their other products are built around (and with generous pouring of wealth from) their search engine.

Either microsoft can emulate the Google business model as they prepare to embrace the cloud, or they will have to invent their own money spinner for the next decade while still offering a meaningful search engine and other products.

Making a good search engine is, technically, a solved problem. Building a strategy for the next decade is something else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One month is not enough time to pronounce bing a winner or a loser. Google didn&#8217;t become a winner in 1 month, heck not even 1 year after it launched. Apart from that, search engine loyalties will not change overnight. Nor will ad spends shift base. IMO, the first month of bing has been noteworthy &#8211; expecting more than that is naive.</p>
<p>The real fun (or war) only begins now..and will run for the rest of year. Will microsoft keep the steam on both product and market innovation for search, while pursuing dreams in other areas &#8211; windows 7, netbooks, azure, silverlight, netflix, twitter&#8230;.</p>
<p>If Google has been successful in search, it is not merely because of the brainwave that Larry and Serge had a decade ago &#8211; it is more due to all the brawn work put in by a huge dedicated team in continuously ensuring that the search results stay relevant. Bing will call for a similar investment of passion. A similar drive to stay relevant and contemporary, to be smart, to be fun.</p>
<p>The biggest question that microsoft will need to answer by the end of the year is: Do we want Bing to make money? Nothing will decide the fate of bing more than the answer to this question.</p>
<p>Note that Google seems to have come to terms with not expecting any money from any of it&#8217;s products other than search. All their other products are built around (and with generous pouring of wealth from) their search engine.</p>
<p>Either microsoft can emulate the Google business model as they prepare to embrace the cloud, or they will have to invent their own money spinner for the next decade while still offering a meaningful search engine and other products.</p>
<p>Making a good search engine is, technically, a solved problem. Building a strategy for the next decade is something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Slice</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Technology Slice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to see the 6 month figures in search behaviour. That would be a true indication of how Bing is doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see the 6 month figures in search behaviour. That would be a true indication of how Bing is doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piyush</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piyush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry guys, I consider this a biased article. I am not expecting you to join the blogosphere bandwagon and hype Bing. BUT atleast you gotta back up statements like these: &quot;Too bad for Redmond, Bing is a lot of splash, but not much else.&quot; with some of your own analysis/investigation. I wouldn&#039;t care if SAI or some other blog would put out farce like that, but not you guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys, I consider this a biased article. I am not expecting you to join the blogosphere bandwagon and hype Bing. BUT atleast you gotta back up statements like these: &#8220;Too bad for Redmond, Bing is a lot of splash, but not much else.&#8221; with some of your own analysis/investigation. I wouldn&#8217;t care if SAI or some other blog would put out farce like that, but not you guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yofrez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yofrez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think of Bing&#039;s third party partnership program? They gave a discount to people who bought an iphone through searching on Bing. I would definitely continue to use bing if they offered similar incentives for me to use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of Bing&#8217;s third party partnership program? They gave a discount to people who bought an iphone through searching on Bing. I would definitely continue to use bing if they offered similar incentives for me to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leslie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They nailed it when they said people dont have any issues with their current search engine. I will fall in that category. I use Google and I did try out Bing. While the homepage looks good, it was distracting me from what I came to Bing for. I ended up clicking for details about the homepage picture. Not something which you want to do when at work. Google works perfectly for me and has never let me down and so I dont see any reason why I should move to Bing or for that matter any other SE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They nailed it when they said people dont have any issues with their current search engine. I will fall in that category. I use Google and I did try out Bing. While the homepage looks good, it was distracting me from what I came to Bing for. I ended up clicking for details about the homepage picture. Not something which you want to do when at work. Google works perfectly for me and has never let me down and so I dont see any reason why I should move to Bing or for that matter any other SE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except the numbers say something else Ballmey :-) Of course I would like to see you guys do better and win and give Google some migraines instead of always being on the defensive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except the numbers say something else Ballmey :-) Of course I would like to see you guys do better and win and give Google some migraines instead of always being on the defensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveballmer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/14/a-look-back-at-a-month-of-binging/#comment-217435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveballmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58750#comment-217435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bing is the thing babababababy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is the thing babababababy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
