<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As TI Dumps Wireless, Mind the Gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/13/as-ti-dumps-wireless-mind-the-gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/13/as-ti-dumps-wireless-mind-the-gap/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shivb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/13/as-ti-dumps-wireless-mind-the-gap/#comment-959600</link>
		<dc:creator>shivb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58517#comment-959600</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;DSPs are the chips that handle packet routing and other jobs that need a high level of mathematical processing in a hurry.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Packet routing is actually a good example of a function that is better doen with dedicated hardware and does not have a &#039;high level of mathematical processing&#039;.  This is in marked contrast to a cellphone or home metworks where key baseband functions are handled by DSPs including OMAP chips.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for Gadget Sleuth&#039;s comments above, I don&#039;t think TI will go under at all; their revenue will go down but profitability should improve (when I was briefly at TI in the mid-90s, the HPA division (High-performance  Analog) produced most of the profit for the company).  And Tl lead the industry in analog sales; more than National, ADI, Linear Technology or Maxim.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So my bet is the other way.  Intel is not the best example as they have never succeeded in communications, particularly RF. Their radios and mixed-signal expertise tends to come from acquisitions; in any event the have struggled in the non-core-processor area -- one examplei is 802.11a where they tried but could not makes the WiFi radio and ultimately used Atheros in the first generation of modems.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;DSPs are the chips that handle packet routing and other jobs that need a high level of mathematical processing in a hurry.&#8221;</p>

<p>Packet routing is actually a good example of a function that is better doen with dedicated hardware and does not have a &#8216;high level of mathematical processing&#8217;.  This is in marked contrast to a cellphone or home metworks where key baseband functions are handled by DSPs including OMAP chips.</p>

<p>As for Gadget Sleuth&#8217;s comments above, I don&#8217;t think TI will go under at all; their revenue will go down but profitability should improve (when I was briefly at TI in the mid-90s, the HPA division (High-performance  Analog) produced most of the profit for the company).  And Tl lead the industry in analog sales; more than National, ADI, Linear Technology or Maxim.</p>

<p>So my bet is the other way.  Intel is not the best example as they have never succeeded in communications, particularly RF. Their radios and mixed-signal expertise tends to come from acquisitions; in any event the have struggled in the non-core-processor area &#8212; one examplei is 802.11a where they tried but could not makes the WiFi radio and ultimately used Atheros in the first generation of modems.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Sleuth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/13/as-ti-dumps-wireless-mind-the-gap/#comment-959255</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Sleuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=58517#comment-959255</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;but TI is still placing a huge bet that it can make up the lost revenue on sales of its applications processors, analog chips and digital signal processors&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A bet it will lose, if Intel is having trouble doing this sort of thing. I actually TI had went under awhile back; it seems like i&#039;ll turn out to be right.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but TI is still placing a huge bet that it can make up the lost revenue on sales of its applications processors, analog chips and digital signal processors&#8221;</p>

<p>A bet it will lose, if Intel is having trouble doing this sort of thing. I actually TI had went under awhile back; it seems like i&#8217;ll turn out to be right.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
