5 Comments

Summary:

How would you like to help determine which projects will receive some of the $4.7 billion in federal funds allocated for broadband improvement around the country? Well, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration has the job for you — as a volunteer grant reviewer. That’s right, […]

imagesHow would you like to help determine which projects will receive some of the $4.7 billion in federal funds allocated for broadband improvement around the country? Well, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration has the job for you — as a volunteer grant reviewer. That’s right, when the government wants to give out $4.7 billion (only $1.6 billion in this first round) in 14 months it has to cut some corners to make sure it can handle the load. That means bringing on citizens to review grant applications. From the letter calling for volunteers:

As a reviewer, your evaluations will be an important factor considered by NTIA in determining whether to award grant funding. To be considered as a reviewer you must have significant expertise and experience in at least one of the following areas: 1) the design, funding, construction, and operation of broadband networks or public computer centers; 2) broadband-related outreach, training, or education; and 3) innovative programs to increase the demand for broadband services. In addition you must agree to comply with Department of Commerce policies on conflict of interest and confidentiality.

Presumably the Department of Commerce policies on conflicts of interest and confidentiality excludes folks working for projects or private firms that are applying for grants. That’s good, but it probably disqualifies a lot of educated volunteers. An NTIA spokesman said the org uses volunteers to review applications for many of its grant programs, and stressed that reviewers don’t decide if the project is funded or not. Regardless, I have a lot of questions about how the process works, mainly as to the scope of a volunteer’s responsibility. Are they matching application items against a checklist, scoring items against a set list, or will they be make their own value judgments? The Department of Agriculture, which is giving out $2.5 billion, will not use volunteer reviewers.

If the NTIA gets back to me on these questions I’ll update the story. In case any of you guys are interested, I also asked how many people the program will need and how much of a time commitment it will take. You can also email the NTIA your own questions about this process at BTOPReviewers@ntia.doc.gov. If anyone steps up, all I ask is that you help spend my taxpayer dollars wisely when it comes to delivering broadband.

Related research

Subscriber Content
?
Subscriber content comes from Gigaom Research, bridging the gap between breaking news and long-tail research. Visit any of our reports to learn more and subscribe.
By Stacey Higginbotham
  1. “Are they matching application items against a checklist, scoring items against a set list, or will they be make their own value judgments?”

    There is a set scoring criteria. Go read the NOFA again, this is discussed.

    Share
    1. Stacey Higginbotham Thursday, July 9, 2009

      Bill, I’m referring specifically to the volunteers’ role rather than the overall approval process.

      Share
  2. Hmmm…. how about accelerating the build out of home networks on the new industry standard: G.hn
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.hn

    Actually, G.hn could be the global economic stimulus package:
    http://www.everywire.com/2009/07/ghn-the-global-stimulus-package.html

    Share
  3. I’m not an engineer by any stretch of the imagination, but it would seem to me the Telecommunication and Information Administration has demonstrated a lack of foresight in asking only for “volunteer grant reviewers” to analyze and grant application’s on where your broadband stimulus dollars should be allocated. The criteria stipulates that individuals must have expertise, education, construction, and/or operations experience in broadband, a loose job skill set at best.

    Yes, this scenario does eliminate the conflicts of interest which could occur if only businesses with a vested interest were to make those recommendations. However, the amount and complexity of spending this much cash should be represented by all parties involved. If the Federal Government wants a sincere effort to accomplish it’s goals with broadband coverage for America, then it needs to use common sense when deciding the recipients of grant applications. Let industry professionals, at the least, advise volunteers on the pitfalls and assumptions when evaluating grant proposals. If this is not done properly, it could be a disaster.

    Share
  4. [...] America. If you want to help determine which projects are stimulus worthy, then get involved. http://gigaom.com/2009/07/09/where-will-4-7b-in-broadband-bucks-go-you-decide/ Before the first round of money starts to flow in November, certain details need to be sorted out [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post