10 Comments

Summary:

Carbon offsets — credits that cancel out the purchaser’s greenhouse gas emissions by supposedly triggering actions and projects that prevent such pollution elsewhere — have had a bumpy ride in the last few years. By late 2007, the idea of going “carbon neutral” using offsets had […]

Carbon offsets — credits that cancel out the purchaser’s greenhouse gas emissions by supposedly triggering actions and projects that prevent such pollution elsewhere — have had a bumpy ride in the last few years. By late 2007, the idea of going “carbon neutral” using offsets had gained enough clout in the U.S. that the House of Representatives spent about $89,000 on offsets. A host of tech companies jumped aboard, too, with Dell, Google and Yahoo, among others, all pledging to go carbon neutral. But since then, the largely unregulated carbon offset market has been dragged through the mud as upon closer inspection, it became clear that emissions weren’t always being canceled out.

Now, with new climate policies and regulations coming down the pike — the EPA plans to spend $5 million next year developing a methodology for carbon offsets under the cap-and-trade system being negotiated in Congress — the ground on which carbon offsets stand is shifting significantly. Tech rivals Google and Yahoo have mapped out two different visions for how to navigate it.

For Yahoo, carbon offsets are out. The company announced last week that it will stop buying offsets for its operations, opting instead to focus on energy efficiency — decreasing the “average electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions” from the company’s data centers, as Yahoo co-founder David Filo explains on the company blog. “We believe creating highly-efficient data centers will have a greater long-term, direct impact on the environment and gives us the best opportunity to play a leadership role in addressing climate change.”

Google, meanwhile, plans to stick with offsets as part of a larger portfolio of renewable energy and efficiency improvements — despite the fact that it took until May of this year for the company to finish buying the credits for the energy it used way back in 2007. As Celeste LeCompte explains on GigaOM Pro (subscription required), that’s largely because tracing carbon offsets back to particular projects and verifying that they actually reduce emissions — and how much — is tricky business. Google Green Energy Czar Bill Weihl noted on the company blog back in May that the lack of regulation for carbon offsets leaves a lot of grunt work for green-minded companies to figure out if their purchases really trigger emission reductions that wouldn’t happen otherwise, or what’s often called “additionality”:

Current standards for offsets require a significant amount of work to evaluate the quality of each offset project and ensure that projects go beyond “business as usual.” Stronger additionality standards — that are more stringent, clear, and objective — would also make it simpler for corporations like Google to use offsets as part of an overall strategy to neutralize emissions.

Companies that follow the lead of Yahoo, with its plan to ditch offsets altogether (at least for the time being) and buckle down on internal efficiency improvements, or Google, with its efforts to police its own offset purchases no matter how long it takes while also working to slash its energy use, may be able to avoid the pitfalls of another tech company that has been among the most aggressive in pursuing carbon neutrality: Dell. It’s no secret that in addition to energy efficiency improvements, the company has been buying offsets based on renewable energy projects to reach that status. But late last year it was revealed, thanks to some in-depth reporting by the Wall Street Journal, that the company was “claiming carbon neutrality mostly by purchasing environmental credits.” Furthermore, some of the offsets were for projects that would have gone through anyway — illustrating the need for those so-called additionality standards.

This is where regulators are poised to take a larger role, setting rules for what kinds of projects can be marketed as carbon offsets. Until now, startups have been stepping in to fill much of the knowledge gap, and going forward, they’ll likely be able to find a role helping companies sort through the new regulations. As Dan Kalafatas, COO and president of 2-year-old offset broker 3Degrees, explained to us on the day of his company’s launch, “Our customers are in the business of coffee or computers,” not carbon.

This article also appeared on BusinessWeek.com.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. fileshare » July 10, 2009 Saturday, July 11, 2009

    [...] Google vs. Yahoo: 2 Routes Toward Carbon Neutral (Earth2Tech) [...]

  2. popurls.com // popular today Saturday, July 11, 2009

    popurls.com // popular today…

    story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com…

  3. Marketing_Secret_Sauce Saturday, July 11, 2009

    dugg for “google vs. yahoo” in the title. like there’s a competition…

  4. Doing authentic reductions in energy use is a more honest method of accounting than buying carbon credits.

  5. Television Spy Sunday, July 12, 2009

    See Carbon offset credits are just ridiculous. You can’t be bothered to make serious changes to your companies lifestyle or structure so rather than making those serious changes, you keep polluting and let someone plant a few trees and then try to pretend that you’re “environmentally friendly” because the amount you polluted was offset by someone else’s efforts that you bought.

    It doesn’t fact that polluting 1ton of waste in Sacramento, is not the same as planting 20 trees in Florida. If you pollute in one area, and clean up another – what’ll happen is the area being cleaned up gets nicer and stays intact, but the area where you’re polluting gets more and more disgusting and inhospitable.

  6. Australia’s online finance broker Wednesday, July 15, 2009

    Businesscarfinance.com.au can even pre-approve your business car loan, so you know you can have the car when you find one.

  7. Blogroll Review: P-Power, B-Buy, C-Can | Powered Naturally – Wind, Water, Sun Saturday, August 15, 2009

    [...] is the big battle between Google and Microsoft? Earth2Tech suggests otherwise. Content provided by and all rights reserved to CleantechBlog.com. Also check out [...]

  8. “Google Energy” Subsidiary: What’s Google Up To? Thursday, January 7, 2010

    [...] the creation of Google Energy is an attempt to proactively address hurdles it could face in its plans to go carbon neutral. Given the legal permission to act as a utility — basically buying and selling clean energy [...]

  9. [#SmartGrid #スマートグリッド] “Google Energy” Subsidiary: What’s Google Up To? « Ippei Suzuki’s Blog Friday, January 8, 2010

    [...] the creation of Google Energy is an attempt to proactively address hurdles it could face in its plans to go carbon neutral. Given the legal permission to act as a utility — basically buying and selling clean energy [...]

  10. Every little bit helps; it isn’t all or nothing. A good policy for reducing your carbon footprint includes reducing your own consumption as well as offsetting offsetting what you are unable to reduce.

Comments have been disabled for this post