<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netbook News: Intel Pricing Can Sway, Sony Joins the Fray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/07/netbook-news-intel-pricing-can-sway-sony-joins-the-fray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/07/netbook-news-intel-pricing-can-sway-sony-joins-the-fray/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/07/netbook-news-intel-pricing-can-sway-sony-joins-the-fray/#comment-216434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57480#comment-216434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ve just corrected the post. Thanks again, Trevor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve just corrected the post. Thanks again, Trevor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/07/netbook-news-intel-pricing-can-sway-sony-joins-the-fray/#comment-216433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57480#comment-216433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trevor, your point on the pricing is correct. My initial draft was edited and I missed the edit changing what I initially wrote about the pricing. Long story short:

Intel Atom with Intel graphics = $25
Intel Atom alone = $45
Nvidia GeForce 9400M = $30 to $35
Nvidia Ion (Atom + 9400M) = $70 to $75

Totally my mistake during the editing process and I appreciate you catching it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor, your point on the pricing is correct. My initial draft was edited and I missed the edit changing what I initially wrote about the pricing. Long story short:</p>
<p>Intel Atom with Intel graphics = $25<br />
Intel Atom alone = $45<br />
Nvidia GeForce 9400M = $30 to $35<br />
Nvidia Ion (Atom + 9400M) = $70 to $75</p>
<p>Totally my mistake during the editing process and I appreciate you catching it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/07/netbook-news-intel-pricing-can-sway-sony-joins-the-fray/#comment-216432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57480#comment-216432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why would the manufacture not buy the complete chipset and than throw the gma in the trash? it see like a logical way to save money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would the manufacture not buy the complete chipset and than throw the gma in the trash? it see like a logical way to save money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/07/netbook-news-intel-pricing-can-sway-sony-joins-the-fray/#comment-216431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trevor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57480#comment-216431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is full of errors. First of all, the ion is $30-35 IN ADDITION to the $45 Atom Chip. The main error is that the author is comparing the Ion/Atom combo to Intel&#039;s Atom and chipset. The Ion setup is worlds beyond the Intel combo which explains why Intel is giving the OEMs a $20 discount to buy the Atom with their crappy chipset.   It&#039;s like McDonalds charging $5 for a big mac sandwich but if you buy one with a soda and fries, then you only pay $3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is full of errors. First of all, the ion is $30-35 IN ADDITION to the $45 Atom Chip. The main error is that the author is comparing the Ion/Atom combo to Intel&#8217;s Atom and chipset. The Ion setup is worlds beyond the Intel combo which explains why Intel is giving the OEMs a $20 discount to buy the Atom with their crappy chipset.   It&#8217;s like McDonalds charging $5 for a big mac sandwich but if you buy one with a soda and fries, then you only pay $3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nebben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/07/netbook-news-intel-pricing-can-sway-sony-joins-the-fray/#comment-216430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nebben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57480#comment-216430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there are reasons to now doubt the potential of the netbook market, http://bit.ly/1JuOlC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are reasons to now doubt the potential of the netbook market, <a href="http://bit.ly/1JuOlC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1JuOlC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

