<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOJ Wants to Probe Telcos? It Should Take a Number</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT CTIA, FCC Chief Plays the Good Cop</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/#comment-216127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AT CTIA, FCC Chief Plays the Good Cop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57359#comment-216127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to help it get access to more spectrum, to make the process of siting mobile towers faster and to roll out faster middle-mile connections in rural and urban areas, all in an effort to improve the delivery of mobile broadband, he said [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to help it get access to more spectrum, to make the process of siting mobile towers faster and to roll out faster middle-mile connections in rural and urban areas, all in an effort to improve the delivery of mobile broadband, he said [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon Blinks in Phone Exclusivity Standoff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/#comment-216126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verizon Blinks in Phone Exclusivity Standoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57359#comment-216126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to investigate these exclusivity deals. Hearings were held last month in Congress, and the Department of Justice is purportedly thinking about at an investigation into the telecommunications [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to investigate these exclusivity deals. Hearings were held last month in Congress, and the Department of Justice is purportedly thinking about at an investigation into the telecommunications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ma Bell 2K? DOJ, FCC looking into AT&#38;T and Verizon &#124; Hester PC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/#comment-216125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma Bell 2K? DOJ, FCC looking into AT&#38;T and Verizon &#124; Hester PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57359#comment-216125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  DOJ Wants to Probe Telcos? It Should Take a Number  (gigaom.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  DOJ Wants to Probe Telcos? It Should Take a Number  (gigaom.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Robins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/#comment-216124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Robins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57359#comment-216124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The telecoms need to open up and make access faster and cheaper  for their users. A business like mine www.binfire.com, needs the faster speed and wider availability of high speed internet to provide better and richer service to its customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The telecoms need to open up and make access faster and cheaper  for their users. A business like mine <a href="http://www.binfire.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.binfire.com</a>, needs the faster speed and wider availability of high speed internet to provide better and richer service to its customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ Wants to Probe Telcos? It Should Take a Number &#171; aneas.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/#comment-216123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOJ Wants to Probe Telcos? It Should Take a Number &#171; aneas.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57359#comment-216123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/doj-wants-to-probe-telcos-it-should-take-a-number/#comment-216122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Glass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=57359#comment-216122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not just AT&amp;T and Verizon. See my blog posting at http://bennett.com/blog/2009/06/whats-this-i-hear-about-special-axes/ for a discussion of the &quot;special access&quot; issue, and the comments for an explanation of how the other owners of long haul fiber backbones, which are not ILECs, are contributing to the problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just AT&amp;T and Verizon. See my blog posting at <a href="http://bennett.com/blog/2009/06/whats-this-i-hear-about-special-axes/" rel="nofollow">http://bennett.com/blog/2009/06/whats-this-i-hear-about-special-axes/</a> for a discussion of the &#8220;special access&#8221; issue, and the comments for an explanation of how the other owners of long haul fiber backbones, which are not ILECs, are contributing to the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

