Here is a great article I found on how to tell if you will loose money with all of these crazy options out there, check it out.

http://ezinearticles.com/?Extremely-Vital-Tips—Make-Money-on-the-Internet—How-to-Tell-ASAP-If-Youll-Lose-Money?&id=2589282

Until grocery stores start giving away food for free, houses/apts are free and dept stores give me free clothes and shoes, I need to earn a salary to feed, cloth and house my kids…and so do you and so does every other responsible adult. That means I, or my employer, needs to get paid enough so I can feed my kids. That means my employer, who pays me, can’t operate unless someone pays them for products and/or services..

Now certainly Google and a dozen, or a hundred, other companies are using “Free” and some are even making enough money off the PPC or other ad based models to sustain operations.

But here’s the problem. A “Free” based economy can’t scale. Even if 1,000 US companies could survive using “Free”, and pay lets say an average of 10,000 people a piece a living wage of some level, that is still only 10,000,000 jobs that perhaps can feed/clothe/house an average of 2 adults and 2 kids per salary. That’s only 40,000,000 people getting 3 squares and a place to sleep. With manufacturing largely gone form the US and white collar corporate job migraitng overseas also, what about the other 260,000,000 people in the US?
And in reality, in the long run, what about the other ~5.75B people on the planet?

The reality is there is no way that even 1,000 companies with 10K employees per company are going to be able to be money-making concerns for any significant length of time on “Free”. “Free” simply doesn’t scale.

The reason is, there aren’t enough ads being impressed today on internet users, nor will there ever be, to generate enough money to allow Free to be a viable foundation for any significant portion of the economy. In fact people are getting better every day at ignoring and not responding to advertising on TV, Internet and everywhere else. Sure there are still, for a while at least, going to be a handful of companies who can reach a critical mass using Free and ad-based revenue. But it will never be enough to support a significant number of people with food/shelter/clothing.

So this whole argument over whether Free versus Paid is a tempest in a small teapot.

The future of the internet is in “paid” services. In 1999 I desperately needed access to a LOT MORE information of all kinds. So I was willing and eager to immerse myself in the full stream of info available on the internet and web. But in 2009, I desperately need LESS total information access because the full stream is way to big for me or anyone to handle on their own. So 1999 to 2009 has ben a blip in time where ad based revenue works because everyone had to wade through the flood on their own and therefore we’ve ben susceptible to the internet advertising that has made Google and osme others quite rich.

But today? Things are changing. Today, I desperately need to get ONLY the information from the internet stream that I NEED to achieve the goals I have set for myself and not even get “wet” with most of the information in the stream. It is already nearly impossible for each of us to sort through the immense flood of data to find the best and specific examples of information we each want/need.

So, going forward, the main thing people will pay for is personalized/customized filtering of the internet information tsunami that continues to grow exponentially. If there are 30 companies all offering me Free service in every possible category then I have a dilemma. Which free service do I choose so I don’t waste all my time trying Free services. I likely will pay to have someone point me at the “RIGHT” Free service for me. Then I likely will be willing to also pay for that service I choose to make sure the quality remains acceptable over time so I don’t always have to be swithing services to the “NEXT BIG THING”.

The fundamental concept that requires that economies operate “for pay”, in a universe with no unlimited sources of free energy, is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law of physics says that in this universe “things tend to disorder” (a.k.a. Entropy). Right in line with this concept, the proliferation of Free services on the internet is causing massive disorder. Services come and go constantly and I have to continuously expend energy just keeping up with all the random changes happening every day. Eventually we will all will lose patience with Free because its a big mess that takes too much time to wade through. Paid services will emerge that help clean it up for useful consumption.

People have always, and will always until we discover a free and virtually unlimited energy source in this universe, pay extra for cleanliness, quality and leisure time.

As the internet stream devolves from enjoyable dip in a clean and invigorating stream that most people can handle into; an overwhelming, near-drowning experience in a tsunami of toxic waste and dangerous sharks; you’ll start to see “for pay” services emerge. These services will distill the toxic, fullstream internet flood into something that is again not only consumable, but actually more enjoyable and more useful to the mainstream of internet user.

Eventually every “Wild West” has to be tamed. The cowboys will all mourn when the Open Range of the nascent 1995 to 2010 internet evolves into fenced farms and ranches and city planners. But such is life.

One can argue that giving something for free and a premium service to a few paying users can support the free stuff can work, but that’s about it. Oh, and if you think any service can be free and run on ads, look at YouTube…