<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Battle for the Home Network Pits PCs Against Set-top Boxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/the-battle-for-the-home-network-pits-pcs-against-set-top-boxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/the-battle-for-the-home-network-pits-pcs-against-set-top-boxes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Let the PC Become a Dinosaur</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/the-battle-for-the-home-network-pits-pcs-against-set-top-boxes/#comment-215061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t Let the PC Become a Dinosaur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55310#comment-215061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] By Stacey Higginbotham  &#124; Saturday, October 17, 2009 &#124; 10:00 AM PT &#124; 0 comments &#124;  8 tweets retweet &#187;      Everything today is connected. And that may be bad news for that PC sitting on your desk or the high-powered laptop that you tote around on business trips. In an increasingly connected world, where data is just a server request away, the PC needs an overhaul to stay relevant, so that it isn&#8217;t merely a hub for all of your digital devices, but it&#8217;s also a contributor to the web and an intelligent orchestrator of the home network. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By Stacey Higginbotham  | Saturday, October 17, 2009 | 10:00 AM PT | 0 comments |  8 tweets retweet &#187;      Everything today is connected. And that may be bad news for that PC sitting on your desk or the high-powered laptop that you tote around on business trips. In an increasingly connected world, where data is just a server request away, the PC needs an overhaul to stay relevant, so that it isn&#8217;t merely a hub for all of your digital devices, but it&#8217;s also a contributor to the web and an intelligent orchestrator of the home network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Service Providers Have Home Networking Hole to Fill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/the-battle-for-the-home-network-pits-pcs-against-set-top-boxes/#comment-215060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Service Providers Have Home Networking Hole to Fill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55310#comment-215060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In the meantime, the PC has become a gateway to entertainment for many people, especially young folks, which means they don&#8217;t subscribe to high-definition TV service. Indeed, according to the Forrester report, 17 percent of young singles and couples eschew HDTV; it&#8217;s far more prevalent among those 40 years of age and older. And that&#8217;s become an area of concern for service providers, especially when it comes to video. With that potential loss of a web-savvy customer base in mind, service providers from Verizon to the cable companies are pushing more networked services such as multiroom DVR. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the meantime, the PC has become a gateway to entertainment for many people, especially young folks, which means they don&#8217;t subscribe to high-definition TV service. Indeed, according to the Forrester report, 17 percent of young singles and couples eschew HDTV; it&#8217;s far more prevalent among those 40 years of age and older. And that&#8217;s become an area of concern for service providers, especially when it comes to video. With that potential loss of a web-savvy customer base in mind, service providers from Verizon to the cable companies are pushing more networked services such as multiroom DVR. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Wireless Networks Aren&#8217;t Yet Ready for Video</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/the-battle-for-the-home-network-pits-pcs-against-set-top-boxes/#comment-215059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Home Wireless Networks Aren&#8217;t Yet Ready for Video]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55310#comment-215059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] And even if carriers don&#8217;t like wireless home networks, it may not be up to them if the PC wins out as the source of entertainment for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And even if carriers don&#8217;t like wireless home networks, it may not be up to them if the PC wins out as the source of entertainment for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/the-battle-for-the-home-network-pits-pcs-against-set-top-boxes/#comment-215058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55310#comment-215058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the manager for Cisco&#039;s cable solutions marketing team, I would suggest that characterizing the &quot;battle&quot; between PCs and set-tops is not entirely accurate -- and misses the point.  The  big  question isn&#039;t  whether consumers are going to be consuming video on a PC or on a set-top— we already know  they want to watch it on both.  Not to mention mobile phones, PDAs, MP3 players, and pretty much any other device with a screen on it.  The big  question is how can consumers be freed from the shackles binding services to specific devices?  They want to view webisodes, use social networking applications, and enjoy vacation photos on their big-screen TV.  They want to see &quot;Desperate Housewives&quot; on their mobile phone, and they want to program their DVR and watch the DVR&#039;s stored content from anywhere.  There is a convergence occurring, and consumers are demanding &quot;unified&quot; access to their services on any device.

Providing this freedom is simple in principle, but there is an awful lot of “stuff” that needs to be done by the &quot;guy behind the curtain&quot; to truly make it a reality.  Traditional cable services were delivered over well-understood, well-tested, and well-controlled networks that delivered video in a single format:  MPEG-2.  And it was managed by a purpose-built control network.  As soon as you start talking about other devices, all of a sudden you have a lot of complexities to worry about...screens of widely varying aspect ratios and physical dimensions, with different amounts of bandwidth available, and delivered using a whole host of different formats -- from Windows Media to Apple QuickTime to Flash.  How do you get content from one format to another?  How do you ensure that the &quot;metadata&quot; (the descriptive information about what the content is, what actors are in it, how long it is, etc.) -- is consistent and understandable by all these different devices?  And yes, much as consumers would love to have nothing but free content, the content providers who build the content deserve to be paid for their efforts...and digital rights management that works between the devices is needed to make sure people only get what they pay for.

The conundrum is how to do all this when consumers  -- no matter what devices they use -- really just want to turn  on those viewing devices and watch some TV.  Simplicity is key.  Service providers have been very successful at integrating digital video recorder (DVR) technology into their set-top boxes -- an approach that &quot;just works&quot; and has the same user interface they are accustomed to.    &quot;Do-it-yourself&quot; types can still use a standalone device.  Consumer choice is good, right?

Consumers will look at their home networks exactly the same way.  Many consumers would be happy to pay a service provider to set up an entertainment system that &quot;just works,&quot; takes care of all the complexities, provides access  using a consistent and simple user interface, and works together with the network delivering content to and from devices outside the home.  Other &quot;do-it-yourself&quot; types will build and manage their home network, and figure out how to make it all work.  Still others will be in between, leasing or purchasing some devices from their service provider and connecting up all the devices they bought at the local Best Buy.  And guess what?  No matter what these consumers decide, it all needs to work together.  THAT, I think, is the real point.


Regards,
Dave Brown,
Cable Solutions Manager
davebr@cisco.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the manager for Cisco&#8217;s cable solutions marketing team, I would suggest that characterizing the &#8220;battle&#8221; between PCs and set-tops is not entirely accurate &#8212; and misses the point.  The  big  question isn&#8217;t  whether consumers are going to be consuming video on a PC or on a set-top— we already know  they want to watch it on both.  Not to mention mobile phones, PDAs, MP3 players, and pretty much any other device with a screen on it.  The big  question is how can consumers be freed from the shackles binding services to specific devices?  They want to view webisodes, use social networking applications, and enjoy vacation photos on their big-screen TV.  They want to see &#8220;Desperate Housewives&#8221; on their mobile phone, and they want to program their DVR and watch the DVR&#8217;s stored content from anywhere.  There is a convergence occurring, and consumers are demanding &#8220;unified&#8221; access to their services on any device.</p>
<p>Providing this freedom is simple in principle, but there is an awful lot of “stuff” that needs to be done by the &#8220;guy behind the curtain&#8221; to truly make it a reality.  Traditional cable services were delivered over well-understood, well-tested, and well-controlled networks that delivered video in a single format:  MPEG-2.  And it was managed by a purpose-built control network.  As soon as you start talking about other devices, all of a sudden you have a lot of complexities to worry about&#8230;screens of widely varying aspect ratios and physical dimensions, with different amounts of bandwidth available, and delivered using a whole host of different formats &#8212; from Windows Media to Apple QuickTime to Flash.  How do you get content from one format to another?  How do you ensure that the &#8220;metadata&#8221; (the descriptive information about what the content is, what actors are in it, how long it is, etc.) &#8212; is consistent and understandable by all these different devices?  And yes, much as consumers would love to have nothing but free content, the content providers who build the content deserve to be paid for their efforts&#8230;and digital rights management that works between the devices is needed to make sure people only get what they pay for.</p>
<p>The conundrum is how to do all this when consumers  &#8212; no matter what devices they use &#8212; really just want to turn  on those viewing devices and watch some TV.  Simplicity is key.  Service providers have been very successful at integrating digital video recorder (DVR) technology into their set-top boxes &#8212; an approach that &#8220;just works&#8221; and has the same user interface they are accustomed to.    &#8220;Do-it-yourself&#8221; types can still use a standalone device.  Consumer choice is good, right?</p>
<p>Consumers will look at their home networks exactly the same way.  Many consumers would be happy to pay a service provider to set up an entertainment system that &#8220;just works,&#8221; takes care of all the complexities, provides access  using a consistent and simple user interface, and works together with the network delivering content to and from devices outside the home.  Other &#8220;do-it-yourself&#8221; types will build and manage their home network, and figure out how to make it all work.  Still others will be in between, leasing or purchasing some devices from their service provider and connecting up all the devices they bought at the local Best Buy.  And guess what?  No matter what these consumers decide, it all needs to work together.  THAT, I think, is the real point.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Dave Brown,<br />
Cable Solutions Manager<br />
<a href="mailto:davebr@cisco.com">davebr@cisco.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/the-battle-for-the-home-network-pits-pcs-against-set-top-boxes/#comment-215057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55310#comment-215057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No thanks. I don&#039;t want to pay some monopolist for the privilege of using my home LAN.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks. I don&#8217;t want to pay some monopolist for the privilege of using my home LAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

