<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Confirms &#8220;3GS,&#8221; Journalists Rejoice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While this clarification is fine for the journalists out there, the choice of name is still a horrible one.  The first thing I did when I heard the announcement was search for &quot;iPhone 3GS&quot; on Google.  I got a bunch of results that were talking about multiple instances of the iPhone 3G.  They could have avoided this problem and the one which you have blogged about if they had just picked some other letter.  Stupid stupid stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this clarification is fine for the journalists out there, the choice of name is still a horrible one.  The first thing I did when I heard the announcement was search for &#8220;iPhone 3GS&#8221; on Google.  I got a bunch of results that were talking about multiple instances of the iPhone 3G.  They could have avoided this problem and the one which you have blogged about if they had just picked some other letter.  Stupid stupid stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um actually the plural for the iPhone 3GS would be iPhone 3GS&#039;
just like the plural of Jesus would be Jesus&#039;.  Anyway just thought I would share.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um actually the plural for the iPhone 3GS would be iPhone 3GS&#8217;<br />
just like the plural of Jesus would be Jesus&#8217;.  Anyway just thought I would share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmund Heaphy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edmund Heaphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I care, Eric. Thanks Josh for the laugh. Actually, scratch that, Eric made me laugh more. Idiots are surprisingly funny!

Edmund.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I care, Eric. Thanks Josh for the laugh. Actually, scratch that, Eric made me laugh more. Idiots are surprisingly funny!</p>
<p>Edmund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re obsessive-compulsive, I suppose you&#039;ve heard of Apple&#039;s Guidelines for Using Apple Trademarks and Copyrights, in which the company claims that: &quot;As adjectives, trademarks may not be used in the plural or possessive form. Correct: I bought two Macintosh computers. Not Correct: I bought two Macintoshes.&quot;

http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/guidelinesfor3rdparties.html

So, I bought two, er, iPhone 3G S cellphones?! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re obsessive-compulsive, I suppose you&#8217;ve heard of Apple&#8217;s Guidelines for Using Apple Trademarks and Copyrights, in which the company claims that: &#8220;As adjectives, trademarks may not be used in the plural or possessive form. Correct: I bought two Macintosh computers. Not Correct: I bought two Macintoshes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/guidelinesfor3rdparties.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/guidelinesfor3rdparties.html</a></p>
<p>So, I bought two, er, iPhone 3G S cellphones?! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DTNick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DTNick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We journalists care when it comes time to write our articles...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We journalists care when it comes time to write our articles&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Pigford</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Pigford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Touché. And fixed. And for the record, a mistake is different than not caring. We certainly care about that stuff. It was just an honest mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touché. And fixed. And for the record, a mistake is different than not caring. We certainly care about that stuff. It was just an honest mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just call me overly obsessive-compulsive, but I care and I appreciate the clarification. Steve Jobs cares. And I bet the people in marketing who lost their jobs over this &quot;trivial&quot; issue now care too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just call me overly obsessive-compulsive, but I care and I appreciate the clarification. Steve Jobs cares. And I bet the people in marketing who lost their jobs over this &#8220;trivial&#8221; issue now care too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it ironic that you care so much about the correct pluralisation of a gadget, but care so little about spellchecking your article, &#039;for those of use having to write about the formerly awkward name&#039;. I don&#039;t think I need to point out the spelling mistake I am referring to, but just in case you can&#039;t do it yourself, it&#039;s &#039;use&#039;, which should be &#039;us&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it ironic that you care so much about the correct pluralisation of a gadget, but care so little about spellchecking your article, &#8216;for those of use having to write about the formerly awkward name&#8217;. I don&#8217;t think I need to point out the spelling mistake I am referring to, but just in case you can&#8217;t do it yourself, it&#8217;s &#8216;use&#8217;, which should be &#8216;us&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Pigford</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Pigford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m guessing you don&#039;t? No idea what makes me think that. Must be a gut instinct. :) ur caps r on, btw]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t? No idea what makes me think that. Must be a gut instinct. :) ur caps r on, btw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/apple-confirms-3gs-journalists-rejoice/#comment-349931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=26915#comment-349931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.......WHO CARES?!?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;.WHO CARES?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
