<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and Privacy on the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john hammerstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john hammerstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Not all retargeting and targeting is bad. Think of it this way--if the pixel is anonymous (meaning no data is taken other than the IP address of the user) the only thing that will happen is that consumers will be sent advertisements that are relevant to what they are interested in, and advertisers or retailers won&#039;t waste money on ads.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all retargeting and targeting is bad. Think of it this way&#8211;if the pixel is anonymous (meaning no data is taken other than the IP address of the user) the only thing that will happen is that consumers will be sent advertisements that are relevant to what they are interested in, and advertisers or retailers won&#8217;t waste money on ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Frothingham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Frothingham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Not all targeting and retargeting companies should be blamed or equated with Facebook. Traditionally, behavioral targeting utilizes data taken from anonymous pixels on IP addresses. This data does not describe whether the person is male or female, their address, e-mail, or any personal information at all. Technically, behavioral targeting could be a positive thing. Think about it. Companies don&#039;t waste money sending advertisements to people who aren&#039;t interested in their products, and consumers get advertisements that might bring them to a site with information they appreciate on it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take for example Jeremy. Jeremy goes to a website and compares prices on two flat screen TVs. He leaves the site without taking an action to buy, and continues surfing the web. Perhaps an hour later, having forgotten about his previous endeavors, he sees an ad with a great deal for a 50 inch plasma. Jeremy gets the deal he was looking for and a retailer or advertiser makes a sale. Ouila! Personalized targeting isn&#039;t the bad guy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition to this, people who own websites that sell durable goods (i.e. small, medium OR large businesses) can partner with retargeting companies, make a data deal, and profit from the serving of ads. In a bad economy, targeting might be an all around help.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;check out http://www.owneriq.com to learn more about non-traditional targeting.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all targeting and retargeting companies should be blamed or equated with Facebook. Traditionally, behavioral targeting utilizes data taken from anonymous pixels on IP addresses. This data does not describe whether the person is male or female, their address, e-mail, or any personal information at all. Technically, behavioral targeting could be a positive thing. Think about it. Companies don&#8217;t waste money sending advertisements to people who aren&#8217;t interested in their products, and consumers get advertisements that might bring them to a site with information they appreciate on it.</p>
<p>Take for example Jeremy. Jeremy goes to a website and compares prices on two flat screen TVs. He leaves the site without taking an action to buy, and continues surfing the web. Perhaps an hour later, having forgotten about his previous endeavors, he sees an ad with a great deal for a 50 inch plasma. Jeremy gets the deal he was looking for and a retailer or advertiser makes a sale. Ouila! Personalized targeting isn&#8217;t the bad guy.</p>
<p>In addition to this, people who own websites that sell durable goods (i.e. small, medium OR large businesses) can partner with retargeting companies, make a data deal, and profit from the serving of ads. In a bad economy, targeting might be an all around help.</p>
<p>check out <a href="http://www.owneriq.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.owneriq.com</a> to learn more about non-traditional targeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketvox. One Place. &#187; Security of Digital Gold with Unified Messaging</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocketvox. One Place. &#187; Security of Digital Gold with Unified Messaging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the cloud, so does the data that constitutes your digital life. Recent articles in TechCrunch and GigaOM question the privacy of some of the most ubiquitous online tools. The truth is that the benefits of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the cloud, so does the data that constitutes your digital life. Recent articles in TechCrunch and GigaOM question the privacy of some of the most ubiquitous online tools. The truth is that the benefits of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feels like the proposal for site opt-out, third party opt-in shifts the power of accessing consumner data towards publishers and away from ad networks and ad servers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feels like the proposal for site opt-out, third party opt-in shifts the power of accessing consumner data towards publishers and away from ad networks and ad servers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual online worlds for kids</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[virtual online worlds for kids]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great analogy! Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde indeed. As usual though we know the exixtence of Hyde we just can&#039;t stop being impressed with Jekyll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analogy! Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde indeed. As usual though we know the exixtence of Hyde we just can&#8217;t stop being impressed with Jekyll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and Privacy on the Web [Voices] True HelloWorld Story</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and Privacy on the Web [Voices] True HelloWorld Story]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and Privacy on the Web [Voices] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and Privacy on the Web [Voices] &#124; UpOff.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site    Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site    Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vad NU! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Make data personal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vad NU! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Make data personal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Th discussion on privacy online is ongoing. Do we want a more personalized experience, or do we put an end to providing companies with bits and pieces of data about our online habits? Do Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde win the race? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Th discussion on privacy online is ongoing. Do we want a more personalized experience, or do we put an end to providing companies with bits and pieces of data about our online habits? Do Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde win the race? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Sleuth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comment-214703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadget Sleuth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=55122#comment-214703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one lesson is: there&#039;s no such thing as true &quot;privacy&quot; on the web. If they want to get at your data or surfing habits, they can. Very easily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one lesson is: there&#8217;s no such thing as true &#8220;privacy&#8221; on the web. If they want to get at your data or surfing habits, they can. Very easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

