<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft and IE: Getting Desperate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Chris Pratt


You&#039;re talking non-sense here, I&#039;m sorry. I doesn&#039;t matter if it is a Microsoft technology. As far as I know, anyone running Silverlight applications in their browsers won&#039;t be using only ie.

I just said it was a great feature in IE7 and IE8 for me that no other browser supports, even if they could. That&#039;s a good reason to have IE for me =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Pratt</p>
<p>You&#8217;re talking non-sense here, I&#8217;m sorry. I doesn&#8217;t matter if it is a Microsoft technology. As far as I know, anyone running Silverlight applications in their browsers won&#8217;t be using only ie.</p>
<p>I just said it was a great feature in IE7 and IE8 for me that no other browser supports, even if they could. That&#8217;s a good reason to have IE for me =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shevonne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shevonne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I heard that IE8 is an improvement from the previous browsers, but I doubt that it can catch up to Chrome and Opera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that IE8 is an improvement from the previous browsers, but I doubt that it can catch up to Chrome and Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Pratt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Pratt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Chris IE8 is the only one that supports XAML because XAML is a strickly Microsoft technology, not a standard. Microsoft threw it in to IE as a nicety for it&#039;s .NET developers, who wouldn&#039;t be using another browser anyways.

Anyways, the browser comparison chart was a complete joke, fully living up to Microsoft&#039;s &quot;if we repeat the same lies enough, they&#039;ll be true&quot; recent marketing approach. Particularly laughable was IE getting a win in the &quot;Development Tools&quot; category. True, Firefox may not come out of the box with development tools, but Web Developer Toolbar + Firebug + Firefox is unbeatable.

Oh! And site compatibility? Seems like Safari 4 is the only browser that has passed the Acid test 100, and I&#039;m already finding rendering errors in IE8 (granted, more minor than in previous iterations of the browser).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris IE8 is the only one that supports XAML because XAML is a strickly Microsoft technology, not a standard. Microsoft threw it in to IE as a nicety for it&#8217;s .NET developers, who wouldn&#8217;t be using another browser anyways.</p>
<p>Anyways, the browser comparison chart was a complete joke, fully living up to Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;if we repeat the same lies enough, they&#8217;ll be true&#8221; recent marketing approach. Particularly laughable was IE getting a win in the &#8220;Development Tools&#8221; category. True, Firefox may not come out of the box with development tools, but Web Developer Toolbar + Firebug + Firefox is unbeatable.</p>
<p>Oh! And site compatibility? Seems like Safari 4 is the only browser that has passed the Acid test 100, and I&#8217;m already finding rendering errors in IE8 (granted, more minor than in previous iterations of the browser).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;And IE has better support for Enterprise applications.

My company uses a version of SAP that was built for IE 6.  There are some javascript errors, but it works okay in IE 7.  Won&#039;t even load in IE 8.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;And IE has better support for Enterprise applications.</p>
<p>My company uses a version of SAP that was built for IE 6.  There are some javascript errors, but it works okay in IE 7.  Won&#8217;t even load in IE 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;And IE has better support for Enterprise applications.

That&#039;s misleading. It is more accurate to say that enterprise applications have consistently developed for a product (IE) rather than a standard, and therefore enterprise app support is stronger for IE than for other browsers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;And IE has better support for Enterprise applications.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s misleading. It is more accurate to say that enterprise applications have consistently developed for a product (IE) rather than a standard, and therefore enterprise app support is stronger for IE than for other browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Mackie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Chris - I think most developers have IE installed, if only to test sites with it (and access the occasional site that requires it). But most savvy users don&#039;t use it as their main browser any more - that&#039;s Microsoft&#039;s problem]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris &#8211; I think most developers have IE installed, if only to test sites with it (and access the occasional site that requires it). But most savvy users don&#8217;t use it as their main browser any more &#8211; that&#8217;s Microsoft&#8217;s problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One great thing about ie is the native support of XAML format.
As a .Net developer, it is useful if I want a quick preview of what the user interface I&#039;m designing is going to look like.

As far as I know, no other browser can directly render xaml files.
So I&#039;m keeping ie8 on my computer, among other browsers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One great thing about ie is the native support of XAML format.<br />
As a .Net developer, it is useful if I want a quick preview of what the user interface I&#8217;m designing is going to look like.</p>
<p>As far as I know, no other browser can directly render xaml files.<br />
So I&#8217;m keeping ie8 on my computer, among other browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though Microsoft would release a Mac version of IE8 again I&#039;d definitely not switch back to it again. Compared with almost any other browser available today no matter if it has been created by Apple, Google, the Mozilla Foundation, the team behind Opera or even small, independent development teams, it&#039;s just the weakest browser anybody could use.

The competition and its website are really poor and sometimes I really wonder why a huge company like Microsoft approves an idea / concept like this at all.

I mean, the site looks just like one of those strange scam websites, just even worse and while having a look at it I&#039;m basically just waiting that a popup with gambling ads suddenly opens up on my screen. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Microsoft would release a Mac version of IE8 again I&#8217;d definitely not switch back to it again. Compared with almost any other browser available today no matter if it has been created by Apple, Google, the Mozilla Foundation, the team behind Opera or even small, independent development teams, it&#8217;s just the weakest browser anybody could use.</p>
<p>The competition and its website are really poor and sometimes I really wonder why a huge company like Microsoft approves an idea / concept like this at all.</p>
<p>I mean, the site looks just like one of those strange scam websites, just even worse and while having a look at it I&#8217;m basically just waiting that a popup with gambling ads suddenly opens up on my screen. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killstead</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killstead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IE has security zones. And IE has better support for Enterprise applications.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE has security zones. And IE has better support for Enterprise applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilo Payan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/18/microsoft-and-ie-getting-desperate/#comment-83948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Camilo Payan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14482#comment-83948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well the real problem, obviously, is that IE completely lacks Linux support :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the real problem, obviously, is that IE completely lacks Linux support :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
