<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The GigaOM Interview: Kristof Kloeckner, CTO of IBM Cloud Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP&#8217;s New Cloud Products Offer a Flashback to 2009: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-580667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HP&#8217;s New Cloud Products Offer a Flashback to 2009: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-580667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] product will compete against Cisco&#8217;s V-Blocks and Acadia efforts as well as against IBM&#8217;s CloudBurst gear and services. It contains the 3Par storage products and HP&#8217;s BladeSystem Matrix products. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] product will compete against Cisco&#8217;s V-Blocks and Acadia efforts as well as against IBM&#8217;s CloudBurst gear and services. It contains the 3Par storage products and HP&#8217;s BladeSystem Matrix products. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM Extends Cloud Presence Beyond IBM Servers: Cloud &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-295979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IBM Extends Cloud Presence Beyond IBM Servers: Cloud &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-295979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] its internal cloud-computing portfolio with three new CloudBurst offerings. One is an update to the current System x-based appliance that doubles the memory and Fibre Channel bandwidth per blade, while a second appliance, based on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its internal cloud-computing portfolio with three new CloudBurst offerings. One is an update to the current System x-based appliance that doubles the memory and Fibre Channel bandwidth per blade, while a second appliance, based on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP Takes the Consulting Fight to IBM With Cloud Design Service &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HP Takes the Consulting Fight to IBM With Cloud Design Service &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] have security and compliance needs on par with the Department of Defense. IBM, on the other hand, offers a cadre of external cloud services, including ones for storage and test development, and intends to roll out even more. For businesses [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have security and compliance needs on par with the Department of Defense. IBM, on the other hand, offers a cadre of external cloud services, including ones for storage and test development, and intends to roll out even more. For businesses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startup Nasuni Targets Primary Storage in the Cloud &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Startup Nasuni Targets Primary Storage in the Cloud &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the two coasts and bring skeptical businesses to the cloud. This strategy makes sense (see, e.g., IBM’s pragmatic cloud strategy), but Nasuni’s 30,000-customer goal could be derailed should other East Coast storage vendors [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the two coasts and bring skeptical businesses to the cloud. This strategy makes sense (see, e.g., IBM’s pragmatic cloud strategy), but Nasuni’s 30,000-customer goal could be derailed should other East Coast storage vendors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinod</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vinod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think cost is not just the only factor towards migrating to cloud &amp; IBM is thinking on those terms of manageability, monitoring &amp; cloud provisioning which most public cloud vendors lack. Also enterprise side cloud migration is picking up &amp; im sure most are thinking in terms of doing a charge back process &amp; support all internal customers. Virtualization has made it easy to share &amp; antomate the workloads to scale up or down but stack over these virtualization solutions those provide the automation &amp; management are the key to a successfull virtualized environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cost is not just the only factor towards migrating to cloud &amp; IBM is thinking on those terms of manageability, monitoring &amp; cloud provisioning which most public cloud vendors lack. Also enterprise side cloud migration is picking up &amp; im sure most are thinking in terms of doing a charge back process &amp; support all internal customers. Virtualization has made it easy to share &amp; antomate the workloads to scale up or down but stack over these virtualization solutions those provide the automation &amp; management are the key to a successfull virtualized environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exclusive: IBM&#8217;s Test Cloud Opens to Public Beta</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Exclusive: IBM&#8217;s Test Cloud Opens to Public Beta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about 600 customers in a private beta. Some in the cloud community were disappointed when Big Blue announced plans for the test and development cloud in June but provided no time table for the public beta and the general availability of the product. But now [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about 600 customers in a private beta. Some in the cloud community were disappointed when Big Blue announced plans for the test and development cloud in June but provided no time table for the public beta and the general availability of the product. But now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Amazon&#8217;s Virtual Private Cloud Be Private Enough?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Amazon&#8217;s Virtual Private Cloud Be Private Enough?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is building its own platform and infrastructure-as-a-service offering called Azure; IBM is creating several gradations of a private cloud from something deployed inside a corporation&#8217;s own data center to a service delivered from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is building its own platform and infrastructure-as-a-service offering called Azure; IBM is creating several gradations of a private cloud from something deployed inside a corporation&#8217;s own data center to a service delivered from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM Takes On Microsoft, Google &#38; Salesforce Clouds</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IBM Takes On Microsoft, Google &#38; Salesforce Clouds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the cloud without offering substance, in June IBM finally unveiled part of its cloud plans. They revolve around providing workload-specific services via an IBM cloud, as a hosted cloud, or inside a company&#8217;s own data center. It kicked off its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the cloud without offering substance, in June IBM finally unveiled part of its cloud plans. They revolve around providing workload-specific services via an IBM cloud, as a hosted cloud, or inside a company&#8217;s own data center. It kicked off its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Commercialization of the Cloud, It&#8217;s Déjà vu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Commercialization of the Cloud, It&#8217;s Déjà vu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Similarly, we now stand at a tipping point at which mainstream enterprises are seeing the value and vendors are offering services that deliver measurable business value, integrate into existing IT environments easily and address [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Similarly, we now stand at a tipping point at which mainstream enterprises are seeing the value and vendors are offering services that deliver measurable business value, integrate into existing IT environments easily and address [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unisys Offers Enterprises a Security Blanket in the Cloud</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unisys Offers Enterprises a Security Blanket in the Cloud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] distinguish its offerings from those of other vendors such as  Sun Microsystems, IBM or Microsoft, Unisys is pitching security. CSC says it is doing the same thing, although it will be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] distinguish its offerings from those of other vendors such as  Sun Microsystems, IBM or Microsoft, Unisys is pitching security. CSC says it is doing the same thing, although it will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Servers and Networking Come From a Single Source?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should Servers and Networking Come From a Single Source?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IBM and Dell need to figure out whether they plan to step into the networking ring. IBM has alluded to partnerships with Juniper on cloud computing initiatives, and is known to have a strong relationship with Brocade (now owner [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IBM and Dell need to figure out whether they plan to step into the networking ring. IBM has alluded to partnerships with Juniper on cloud computing initiatives, and is known to have a strong relationship with Brocade (now owner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Popescu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Popescu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure why my first comment didn&#039;t got thru, so I&#039;m trying reposting it.
The IBM announcement is a bit confusing as it looks like they are selling virtualization enabled equipments. While virtualization may be related to the cloud, IMO they are not quite equivalent.
On the other hand, one of the main principles of the cloud is that you don&#039;t need specific assumptions as the cloud will scale up and down with almost linear costs. The IBM offer is based on an initial assumption about the workload which to me seems to contradict the whole cloud idea.

./alex
--
Everything about the cloud
:http://the.dailycloud.net:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why my first comment didn&#8217;t got thru, so I&#8217;m trying reposting it.<br />
The IBM announcement is a bit confusing as it looks like they are selling virtualization enabled equipments. While virtualization may be related to the cloud, IMO they are not quite equivalent.<br />
On the other hand, one of the main principles of the cloud is that you don&#8217;t need specific assumptions as the cloud will scale up and down with almost linear costs. The IBM offer is based on an initial assumption about the workload which to me seems to contradict the whole cloud idea.</p>
<p>./alex<br />
&#8211;<br />
Everything about the cloud<br />
:<a href="http://the.dailycloud.net" rel="nofollow">http://the.dailycloud.net</a>:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Popescu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Popescu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must confess that I&#039;m still a bit puzzled by this &#039;announcement&#039;. My impression is that IBM is offering equipments prepared for virtualization, which may be connected to cloud, but not necessarily.
One of the main assumptions of cloud computing is that you don&#039;t need to use any assumptions before hand as the solution will allow you to scale up and down with almost linear costs. Well, IBM offering starts based on the workload assumption and this contradicts the notion of cloud.

./alex]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess that I&#8217;m still a bit puzzled by this &#8216;announcement&#8217;. My impression is that IBM is offering equipments prepared for virtualization, which may be connected to cloud, but not necessarily.<br />
One of the main assumptions of cloud computing is that you don&#8217;t need to use any assumptions before hand as the solution will allow you to scale up and down with almost linear costs. Well, IBM offering starts based on the workload assumption and this contradicts the notion of cloud.</p>
<p>./alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing, Strategy &#38; Technology Links &#8211; June 17, 2009 &#171; Sazbean</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Marketing, Strategy &#38; Technology Links &#8211; June 17, 2009 &#171; Sazbean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The GigaOM Interview: Kristof Kloeckner, CTO of IBM Cloud Computing (GigaOM) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GigaOM Interview: Kristof Kloeckner, CTO of IBM Cloud Computing (GigaOM) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BotchagalupeMarks for June 16th - 12:46 &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BotchagalupeMarks for June 16th - 12:46 &#124; IT Management and Cloud Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The GigaOM Interview: Kristof Kloeckner, CTO of IBM Cloud Computing - The offering seems like a crippled compromise between the scalability and flexibility that true computing clouds offers and what enterprises seem to be demanding when it comes to controlling their own infrastructure. I spoke today with the chief technology officer of IBM&#8217;s cloud computing division, Kristof Kloeckner, to learn more. Below is an edited account of our talk. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GigaOM Interview: Kristof Kloeckner, CTO of IBM Cloud Computing &#8211; The offering seems like a crippled compromise between the scalability and flexibility that true computing clouds offers and what enterprises seem to be demanding when it comes to controlling their own infrastructure. I spoke today with the chief technology officer of IBM&rsquo;s cloud computing division, Kristof Kloeckner, to learn more. Below is an edited account of our talk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/06/15/ibm-tries-to-sell-enterprises-on-workload-specific-clouds/#comment-214166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=54357#comment-214166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Bob ... Like Appistry&#039;s platform, perhaps? ;-)

Anyhow, IBM corrected me regarding CloudBurst. That is a prepackaged, fully virtualized blade rack designed for private cloud initiatives. Here are the specs:

-- Base Hardware Configuration:

    * 1 42U rack
    * 1 BladeCenter Chassis
    * 1 3650M2 Management Server, 8 cores, 24GB Ram
    * 1 HS22 CloudBurst Management Blade, 8 cores, 48GB RAM
    * 3 managed HS22 blades, 8 cores, 48GB RAM
    * DS3400 FC attached storage

-- Cloud Software Configuration:

    * IBM CloudBurst service management pack
    * IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager v7.1
    * IBM Tivoli Monitoring v6.2.1
    * IBM Systems Director 6.1.1 with Active Energy Manager; IBM ToolsCenter 1.0; IBM DS Storage Manager for DS4000 v10.36; LSI SMI-S provider for DS3400
    * VMware VirtualCenter 2.5 U4; VMware ESXi 3.5 U4 hypervisor

The price tag of around $220K seems a little steep, but the monthly payment does include hardware, management software and hypervisor. Networking will be added to the stack in future incarnations. So IBM is offering an internal cloud platform on top of the services, which have been getting most of the attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bob &#8230; Like Appistry&#8217;s platform, perhaps? ;-)</p>
<p>Anyhow, IBM corrected me regarding CloudBurst. That is a prepackaged, fully virtualized blade rack designed for private cloud initiatives. Here are the specs:</p>
<p>&#8211; Base Hardware Configuration:</p>
<p>    * 1 42U rack<br />
    * 1 BladeCenter Chassis<br />
    * 1 3650M2 Management Server, 8 cores, 24GB Ram<br />
    * 1 HS22 CloudBurst Management Blade, 8 cores, 48GB RAM<br />
    * 3 managed HS22 blades, 8 cores, 48GB RAM<br />
    * DS3400 FC attached storage</p>
<p>&#8211; Cloud Software Configuration:</p>
<p>    * IBM CloudBurst service management pack<br />
    * IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager v7.1<br />
    * IBM Tivoli Monitoring v6.2.1<br />
    * IBM Systems Director 6.1.1 with Active Energy Manager; IBM ToolsCenter 1.0; IBM DS Storage Manager for DS4000 v10.36; LSI SMI-S provider for DS3400<br />
    * VMware VirtualCenter 2.5 U4; VMware ESXi 3.5 U4 hypervisor</p>
<p>The price tag of around $220K seems a little steep, but the monthly payment does include hardware, management software and hypervisor. Networking will be added to the stack in future incarnations. So IBM is offering an internal cloud platform on top of the services, which have been getting most of the attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

